B
People argue that using NFP with the intent to avoid pregnancy for frivilous reasons is a sin. I put all I know on the subject in post #33, and it sums up pretty well how I feel about the subject.I think this “contraceptive mentality while using NFP” is a bunch of balogna.
Each and every act must be open to life. If the Church accepts NFP under any circumstances, then that means each act done during an infertile phase is still open to life.
So, even if you are avoiding pregnancy for what some may consider frivolous reasons, and you are using NFP to do this, you can’t be sinning.
If you think that NFP can be used sinfully, please point out when exactly the couple is sinning. Are they sinning when they have relations during the infertile phase? Or are they sinning when they do NOT have relations during a fertile phase?
Since children are the ultimate good of marriage, it is selfish, prideful, and displays a lack of trust in God’s providence if a couple deliberately avoids having children when there is no good reason. Basically, although their physical acts may be open to life, their intention and mentality is not. So the sinning is not really related to their intimacy at all, but rather to their intentional spurning of the life that God blesses marriages with through intimacy.I think this “contraceptive mentality while using NFP” is a bunch of balogna.
Each and every act must be open to life. If the Church accepts NFP under any circumstances, then that means each act done during an infertile phase is still open to life.
So, even if you are avoiding pregnancy for what some may consider frivolous reasons, and you are using NFP to do this, you can’t be sinning.
If you think that NFP can be used sinfully, please point out when exactly the couple is sinning. Are they sinning when they have relations during the infertile phase? Or are they sinning when they do NOT have relations during a fertile phase?
Bless you, Abby, and thank you for the (name removed by moderator)ut and support.I remember Javelin from almost a year ago, in another thread, where he posted much of his wife’s personal health information and it became extremely clear that they have just reasons to abstain/avoid during ovulation. (I only say this for all of you who are openly speculating whether or not it is morally permissible for he and his wife to use NFP to avoid.)
Javelin: PLEASE tell your wife to get in touch with a Creighton Model practioner. I know exactly what your wife is talking about in terms of sympto-thermal. Doing internal checks on one’s cervix and to check for early mucus was not something I enjoyed either. Creighton is a method that ONLY measures what a woman externally produces. She is NEVER asked to do any internal checks whatsoever. It is a very, very simple sticker recording system that is done once a day, at night before bed. The fertility practioner can explain the rest, but the only other involvement is basically checking indications that are easily observed on toilet paper. It’s SO simple and 99 percent accurate. They call it “Napro Technology” and the introductory sessions are free. Materials are $25.
Do a google search for “the creighton model” or “napro technology.” It should lead you to a website that will let you select a fertility practioner of the Creighton Model in your area who will guide you both very carefully in learning and using it.
Abby
That’s fine, but if it’s the author’s take on the whole thing, it’s not a reliable source. Just because a magazine published someone’s opinion, it’s not automatically Church teaching.I remember an article from The Latin Mass journal that stated if NFP was practiced with the intention of not conceiving, and without “legitimate” circumstances that necessitate that practice, then the couple was in a state of mortal sin, just as if they had used other methods of contraception. I will have to try to find the source and I will post it.
The problem with the monitor is that the sticks can be expensive, and we find that the drug store doesn’t always have them. You can usually do better by ordering the sticks off EBay though. It’s also not fail proof. We ran out of sticks, and couldn’t find any for a while. We didn’t mind too much because my wife’s cycle was so predictable, she didn’t feel we needed the monitor much anymore. Then she started taking medication for a kidney ailment. Apparently, the only side effect she got was an irregular cycle. We are expecting our third around Christmas.
As a side note, I think on threads like this, we should assume that the OP is correctly using his God-given judgment to use NFP properly. I’m not saying the moral issues shouldn’t be brought up, but some of the posts here have sounded rather accusative to me, and since there is not nearly enough info given to know either way, that’s pretty rude.
I don’t know exactly what your wife disagrees with, but here is an analogy that helped me understand the difference.She doesn’t really buy the reasons why ABC is sinful and NFP is not…
Wanting to providing money for your family is a good desire. To provide money you can either work and earn money, or steal it from others. Both methods achieve a good end (money for your family). One is a moral way to go about, the other is not. Same thing with abstinence VS contraception.