New anti-catholic book spreading falsehoods

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dpoc41
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Dpoc41

Guest
Catholic Doctrines and Man-made Myths: Finding True Christianity [Kindle Edition] Link

The book is small, and free. I downloaded a copy and read through and left a comment.

product description -

With consummate logic, the author provides a critical but sympathetic reappraisal of numerous doctrinal positions which have been assimilated incrementally into the belief systems of Christian Churches, particularly the Catholic Church, over the two thousand year period since the early followers of Jesus Christ formed themselves into a “church”.
In Jesus’ teaching — which he conveyed more by his example than by his words — he never proposed the establishment of a formalized Church. He sought, rather, to establish on earth the “Kingdom of God” which would spread, in the form of Love of Neighbour, throughout all humanity.
Stated with conviction, yet always open to conflicting views, the arguments put forward here are a contribution to the intense debate on Christian beliefs and praxis that is sweeping Christendom as never before.
Searching afresh with the penetrating light of reason, and unencumbered by the dependence and the fear of sanction, or even of excommunication, which restrains the Churches’ professional theologians, the author is free of the weight of tradition on which the Churches rely so heavily to support many of their mystery-laden doctrines, and which, itself, is questionable just as is, in his view, the Churches’ catchall claim to “revelation”.
These, and other dogmatic beliefs such as Original Sin, Hell and The Devil, Purgatory, the Canonisation of Saints, Infallibility, and such subjects as divorce and the church’s attitude vis-à-vis women, are all re-examined with the same frankness, well supported by a wide range of literary references.
A thorough and painstaking reassessment is also undertaken of the ill-conceived and self-defeating doctrine of the Bodily Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary into Heaven. This necessary reassessment is engaged with due respect and affection for this epitome of Motherhood.
There is also no shrinking from giving implicit expression to the need for Christians to undertake the daunting but rewarding journey from the comfort of the pews and from the warm consoling embrace of a Church which provides us with all the answers and with all the feel-good beliefs, obligatory Sunday rituals and sacraments, which comfort us with the assurance that we are on the right road to God’s heavenly domain. The journey must lead us from those comforts to within reach of the majority of our brothers and sisters, those who live ill-clad and hungry in makeshift shacks or on cold shelterless streets. There, and ultimately in the presence of our Maker, we will be measured by our own self judgment in terms of how well we have responded to the universal imperative to love our neighbour as we ourselves would wish to be loved.
In a less reform-seeking mode, the author also provides an innovative, practical and yet sympathetic way of understanding and coping with the perennial problem of pain and suffering which torments so many people and which leads many all too readily to the sadly illogical practice of “blaming God” for our misfortunes.
 
how sad, that they lead people to destruction. ‘they neither enter heaven themselves, and also prevent others from entering’.
 
Catholicism is the only religion worth attacking. 🙂

Or defending.

Could you find many people who would be passionately for, or against, one of the other denominations or non-denominational sects springing up? At the non-denominational church in my area, the battle-cry is “Have a nice day”.
 
Catholicism is the only religion worth attacking. 🙂

Or defending.

Could you find many people who would be passionately for, or against, one of the other denominations or non-denominational sects springing up? At the non-denominational church in my area, the battle-cry is “Have a nice day”.
👍 yes, reminds me of this quote by Fulton Sheen -

“If I were not a Catholic, and were looking for the true Church in the world today, I would look for the one Church which did not get along well with the world; in other words, I would look for the Church which the world hated. My reason for doing this would be, that if Christ is in any one of the churches of the world today, He must still be hated as He was when He was on earth in the flesh. If you would find Christ today, then find the Church that does not get along with the world. Look for the Church that is hated by the world as Christ was hated by the world. Look for the Church that is accused of being behind the times, as our Lord was accused of being ignorant and never having learned. Look for the Church which men sneer at as socially inferior, as they sneered at Our Lord because He came from Nazareth. Look for the Church which is accused of having a devil, as Our Lord was accused of being possessed by Beelzebub, the Prince of Devils. Look for the Church which, in seasons of bigotry, men say must be destroyed in the name of God as men crucified Christ and thought they had done a service to God. Look for the Church which the world rejects because it claims it is infallible, as Pilate rejected Christ because He called Himself the Truth. Look for the Church which is rejected by the world as Our Lord was rejected by men. Look for the Church which amid the confusions of conflicting opinions, its members love as they love Christ, and respect its Voice as the very voice of its Founder, and the suspicion will grow, that if the Church is unpopular with the spirit of the world, then it is unworldly, and if it is unworldly it is other worldly. since it is other-worldly, it is infinitely loved and infinitely hated as was Christ Himself. But only that which is Divine can be infinitely hated and infinitely loved. Therefore the Church is Divine.”

Taken from Radio Replies, Vol. 1, p IX, Rumble & Carty, Tan Publishing
 
Catholicism is the only religion worth attacking. 🙂

Or defending.

Could you find many people who would be passionately for, or against, one of the other denominations or non-denominational sects springing up? At the non-denominational church in my area, the battle-cry is “Have a nice day”.
I often wonder if they believe in the 8th Commandment!! God Bless, Memaw
 
Looking for the author I found this:

scross.co.za/2012/05/laymans_theology/
Sweeping call for reforms not theology
A LAYMAN’S THEOLOGY, by Bernard Straughan. Coppinger Press, Cape Town, 2011. 132pp.
Reviewed by Michael Shackleton
"In his preface the author says: “It is sincerely hoped that the questions that are to be asked here, and therefore the views that will be expressed, will add in some way, however small, to our understanding of, and our wonder at, the marvels of a Creator God and, specifically, to our understanding of the nature and teachings of Jesus Christ.”
His sincerity must be taken seriously. Bernard Straughan is a well educated cradle Catholic who has seen the Church evolve in his time from pre-Vatican II conservatism to its present more accepting attitude to the modern world. He has struggled with his dilemmas and perceived inconsistencies in the Church’s teachings and conduct, and his frustrations are poured out vividly in this short volume…"
I think this explains the intention of the new book… He appears to be a catholic spreading his own doubts about the Church. We should pray for him and for those who are in his path.
 
Looks like this came out a year ago.

From the Amazon.com description you post, this book doesn’t sound specifically or only “anti-Catholic”, as per your subject line.
The very first sentence points out it is “a critical but sympathetic re-appraisal” of the doctrines of Christian churches over the last 2000 years, that would include Catholic, Protestant, and other Jesus-linked churches that do not come under either label.

So as per one poster’s comment – “typical Protestants”…well, we don’t know if this author is Protestant or religious at all (is he?).

It actually sounds quite pro-God, especially in that last paragraph, talking about encouraging people to help others in need and that we should not “blame God” for our misfortunes.

Just because a book questions and re-examines a belief system, it doesn’t mean it is “anti” anything.
There is nothing wrong with talking, questioning, and debating of course. That is healthy.
And just because someone doesn’t agree with one group’s beliefs, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are attacking it (tho I know you did not use that word).

But since you read the book, perhaps you can comment on all the above?
And also, tell us specifically which “falsehoods” you feel this book is spreading?
And how it is anti-Catholic?

To me, the description you posted shows none of the above.

.
are you serious? did you even read the first post? did you read the section about our Mother? quote: ‘He never proposed a formalized church’. right, i guess, ‘on this rock, I will build my church’ was a meaningless statement.:rolleyes:
 
the problem with all these people (and it has been going on for 2000 years) is that they think the scriptures appeared out of nowhere. that the catholic church had nothing to do with collecting, assembling and compiling them.

then they think they can take the bible, which they think ‘just mysteriously appeared out of nowhere’, build their own church out of it, and suddenly, ‘it’s pure, and free from man made tradition.’

but what happens then? someone asks a question, that can’t be answered by scripture. now what do they do? they start their own tradition. and one more protestant church is created.
 
Looks like this came out a year ago.

From the Amazon.com description you post, this book doesn’t sound specifically or only “anti-Catholic”, as per your subject line.
The very first sentence points out it is “a critical but sympathetic re-appraisal” of the doctrines of Christian churches over the last 2000 years, that would include Catholic, Protestant, and other Jesus-linked churches that do not come under either label.

So as per one poster’s comment – “typical Protestants”…well, we don’t know if this author is Protestant or religious at all (is he?).

It actually sounds quite pro-God, especially in that last paragraph, talking about encouraging people to help others in need and that we should not “blame God” for our misfortunes.

Just because a book questions and re-examines a belief system, it doesn’t mean it is “anti” anything.
There is nothing wrong with talking, questioning, and debating of course. That is healthy.
And just because someone doesn’t agree with one group’s beliefs, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are attacking it (tho I know you did not use that word).

But since you read the book, perhaps you can comment on all the above?
And also, tell us specifically which “falsehoods” you feel this book is spreading?
And how it is anti-Catholic?

To me, the description you posted shows none of the above.

.
Excellent post!!
 
The very first sentence may point out it is “a critical but sympathetic re-appraisal” of the doctrines of Christian churches over the last 2000 years but all he does is trash traditional catholic beliefs: " Hell does not exist, doubts The Trinity, Purgatory does not exist, no Venial or Mortal sins, all sins are the same, no need for Confession, Canonisation is farcical and irrelevant, no need to pray for the dead, calls the idea that the death of Jesus is a pleasing to The Father as utterly repugnant, questions Original Sin, says we have made a fetish of the use of water from a Baptismal Font, people sitting in the pews at Mass are living out a delusion, Obligatory Mass on sunday is a great disservice, the death of Jesus on the cross was not a sacrificial act, there is no moral justification for the Church’s condemnation of The use of contraceptives (excluding abortifacients). Coitus Interruptus, Homosexuality, Pre-marital / Casual Sex, Auto-Eroticism, St. Peter was infected with ideas of women’s inferiority, Jesus did not welcome or place a value on people’s suffering, (Had Jesus placed value on people’s pain and suffering he could have offered to make healthy people sick instead of healing their sicknesses, or he could have suggested to them other means whereby they could endure pain in order to offer it to the Father in love and homage.), The Church’s infallible doctrinal pronouncement regarding the Assumption fails on two counts. First, it has failed to take into account the fact that the Blessed Virgin Mary, like every other living being, effectively had, not one, but many bodies. And Second, it has “infallibly” adopted an impossibility, a self-contradictory proposal, that a material entity can exist in an entirely “spiritual” non-material domain?. If all this bile is not anti-catholic, what is?
 
we can also download the book, (its free) and leave some truth about the sacraments in a review
Downloading the book will only support the writer, so I would advise not clicking the link and not following any downloads. Even this thread is giving publicity where it is unwarranted.
 
This line of thinking could take a person to several Christian churches.
Many are disliked or “hated” by those who have such feelings.

.
That may be so, but not to the extent that The Catholic Church is hated, not in my opinion anyhow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top