New Article on Catholicism and Freemasonry

  • Thread starter Thread starter yosephdaviyd
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I loved it :). Especially with all these Dan Brown-type novels (which I actually enjoyed:p) around portraying Masonry sympathetically, such thorough discussion, that systematically goes through all the bases, is needed.

I being well versed in Catholicism, could easily see the problems with Masonry, especially in “The Lost Symbol”. But in the other books, before he went into all the detail as this one, I’d been looking for a comprehensive discussion of Masonry and Catholicism, and only found short snippets. This would have been very welcome while reading the early books!

PS, the disclaimer speaking of your insider’s view about how members really are dedicated and sincere was appreciated, as too often, what little I found was so derogatory towards Masons, when their members, despite the deficiencies in the organization’s philosophies, manages to do a lot of good in the community. 🙂
 
I loved it :). Especially with all these Dan Brown-type novels (which I actually enjoyed:p) around portraying Masonry sympathetically, such thorough discussion, that systematically goes through all the bases, is needed.

I being well versed in Catholicism, could easily see the problems with Masonry, especially in “The Lost Symbol”. But in the other books, before he went into all the detail as this one, I’d been looking for a comprehensive discussion of Masonry and Catholicism, and only found short snippets. This would have been very welcome while reading the early books!

PS, the disclaimer speaking of your insider’s view about how members really are dedicated and sincere was appreciated, as too often, what little I found was so derogatory towards Masons, when their members, despite the deficiencies in the organization’s philosophies, manages to do a lot of good in the community. 🙂
Thanks RunningDude! I appreciate the comments!
 
I really enjoyed the article. It was very informative on a topic I was aware of but didn’t understand.
 
A very good article offering helpful insights - thank you, David. 👍
 
Wrote this article, “Freemasonry and Catholicism - a Match Not made in Heaven” - comments and critiques welcomed. Click onto ‘view FULL page’ if clicking is too tedious for you. Thanks a lot! 👍

LINK: associatedcontent.com/article/5808772/catholicism_and_freemasonry_a_match.html?cat=34
I studied Freemasonry in the 1990’s. Here’s a couple of the books I read: “Behind the Lodge Door” by Paul Fisher, “Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked” by Msgr George Dillon, “The Social Rights of Our Divine Lorde Jesus Christ The King” by Fr Denis Fahey and “Secret Societies and the Kingship of Christ” by Fr Denis Fahey. These will lay out in great detail why Freemasonry is dangerous. The Grand Orient Lodge was repsonsible for all the revolutions of the 1800’s and early 1900’s. Modern Freemasonry started around 1727 and the major figure was Voltaire. Paul Fisher’s book shows how freemasonry was behind many decisions made in the U.S. such as the Everson Case ruled by the Supreme Court.This is where the idea of Separation of Church and State first materialized. Many of the footnotes come from the Congressional Records.
 
“The Social Rights of Our Divine Lorde Jesus Christ The King” by Fr Denis Fahey and “Secret Societies and the Kingship of Christ” by Fr Denis Fahey.
Fr. Denis Fahey was a well-known anti-semite. Apparently, he was a well-known anti-mason as well.
Wrote this article, “Freemasonry and Catholicism - a Match Not made in Heaven” - comments and critiques welcomed. Click onto ‘view FULL page’ if clicking is too tedious for you. Thanks a lot!
What I would really like to know is how you think that modern Freemasonry is in opposition to the Church. That certainly isn’t true today. It was true, perhaps, back when the Church was executing the Knights Templar under false allegations, or when the Church fought the Italian civil authorities that were promoting public education over private schooling.

Many of our Founding Fathers were Freemasons, including George Washington. It appears that the only reason why the Church opposes Freemasonry is on political grounds: anti-freedom, anti-public education, anti-liberty, etc.

Freemasonry today is apolitical. It sure would be nice to hear a rational explanation for the Church’s opposition to Freemasonry, aside from general philosophical differences (such as bringing men together of different religious faiths in fraternal brotherhood).
 
I studied Freemasonry in the 1990’s. Here’s a couple of the books I read: “Behind the Lodge Door” by Paul Fisher, “Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked” by Msgr George Dillon, “The Social Rights of Our Divine Lorde Jesus Christ The King” by Fr Denis Fahey and “Secret Societies and the Kingship of Christ” by Fr Denis Fahey. These will lay out in great detail why Freemasonry is dangerous. The Grand Orient Lodge was repsonsible for all the revolutions of the 1800’s and early 1900’s. Modern Freemasonry started around 1727 and the major figure was Voltaire. Paul Fisher’s book shows how freemasonry was behind many decisions made in the U.S. such as the Everson Case ruled by the Supreme Court.This is where the idea of Separation of Church and State first materialized. Many of the footnotes come from the Congressional Records.
Thanks James - I agree the historical issues are FASCINATING. I appreciated them even more after I converted to Catholicism and revisited those issues from the other side. I think many Catholics who be surprised at how entrenched Freemasons have been at the Vatican and how hard they have tried to influence documents that the Councils have produces, even as late as Vatican II. Your European, French in particular, Freemasons are an entirely different animal than your Freemasons in most countries, who are most interested in the ‘brotherhood’, than the philosophical and social agenda of Freemasonry.
 
Fr. Denis Fahey was a well-known anti-semite. Apparently, he was a well-known anti-mason as well.

What I would really like to know is how you think that modern Freemasonry is in opposition to the Church. That certainly isn’t true today. It was true, perhaps, back when the Church was executing the Knights Templar under false allegations, or when the Church fought the Italian civil authorities that were promoting public education over private schooling.

Many of our Founding Fathers were Freemasons, including George Washington. It appears that the only reason why the Church opposes Freemasonry is on political grounds: anti-freedom, anti-public education, anti-liberty, etc.

Freemasonry today is apolitical. It sure would be nice to hear a rational explanation for the Church’s opposition to Freemasonry, aside from general philosophical differences (such as bringing men together of different religious faiths in fraternal brotherhood).
That is the exact question that I attempt to answer in the article. It all comes down to this question in regards to the current Cannon Law, "Is the Masonic order an association that plots against the Church.’ My answer is ‘yes’ because it offers an alternative truth than the truth that the Church offers.
 
That is the exact question that I attempt to answer in the article. It all comes down to this question in regards to the current Cannon Law, "Is the Masonic order an association that plots against the Church.’ My answer is ‘yes’ because it offers an alternative truth than the truth that the Church offers.
It is against canon law for a Catholic to practice Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc. That does not mean that these groups are "plotting against the Church because they offer an “alternative truth than the Church offers”. They are not.

Just because the Church forbids Catholics to become Masons, does not equate that Masons today “plot against the Church.”

As a past Mason, I am sure you are well aware that both politics and religion are strictly forbidden from discussion during regular Lodge meetings. And, I am sure you are also aware that Freemasonry takes an apolitical stance: It does not promote political candidates, and does not promote a liberal nor conservative agenda in the political sphere. It is apolitical. It is also a fraternal organization, not a religion.

Have you ever personally witnessed Masonry plotting against the Catholic Church in any Lodge meeting you have ever attended? I thought not.

The logic your are using is, forgive my bluntness, patently ridiculous. If you use this same logic, then you would have to also state that the Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, and several other fraternal organizations are similarly “plotting against the Church” because these same organizations hold “alternative views of the truth than what the Church teaches as truth”.

There is a long history of the Church persecution of Masonry for sheer greed, power, and political reasons, that have nothing whatsoever to do with spirituality.
 
It is against canon law for a Catholic to practice Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc. That does not mean that these groups are "plotting against the Church because they offer an “alternative truth than the Church offers”. They are not.

Just because the Church forbids Catholics to become Masons, does not equate that Masons today “plot against the Church.”

And, I am sure you are also aware that Freemasonry takes an apolitical stance: It does not promote political candidates, and does not promote a liberal nor conservative agenda in the political sphere. It is apolitical. It is also a fraternal organization, not a religion.

Have you ever personally witnessed Masonry plotting against the Catholic Church in any Lodge meeting you have ever attended? I thought not.

The logic your are using is, forgive my bluntness, patently ridiculous. If you use this same logic, then you would have to also state that the Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, and several other fraternal organizations are similarly “plotting against the Church” because these same organizations hold “alternative views of the truth than what the Church teaches as truth”.
.
GerardMajella, thanks for the reply. Since you took the time in your post to ask me questions and answer them for me, and still do not seem to have wrapped your arms around the central points of my article - I am going to get long winded on your here. 🙂
  1. Catholics are **obliged **NOT asked to not become members of associations that plot against the Church and it is clear from the CDF 1983 Document at the Masonic Order is one of those groups.
  2. Why/How does the Masonic Order plots against the Church has nothing whatsoever to do with the men who join, whom both, you and I, know are some real quality fellows. QUITE ON THE CONTRARY - Read the Cannon Law together with the CDF Document that I highlighted in the article and you will clearly see Why/How the Church believes that the Masonic Order is an organization that plots against it. It is based solely upon the ‘Principles’ of Freemasonry, which inveigh greatly against the ‘Principles’ of the Catholic Church.
2a. The keystone of those Principles of Freemasonry that inveigh against the Principles of the Catholic Church has to do with Jesus Christ. If you recall ‘Anderson’s Constitution’, which is the foundation rule of all regular lodges, there is no room for sectarianism in Freemasonry. Sure, that may make the Masonic Lodge a cool place to hang out with other monotheists, but it also strips you, as a Christian, of cooperating with the great commission that Jesus Christ gave you; that is to go out and baptize and teach the Gospel.

Look, anytime or any place where you are forbidden from doing the great thing that Jesus has asked you to do - you are being persecuted for your faith. In this way, there is little difference from the Masonic Lodge and parts of Pakistan. You cannot be the Christian that God has called you to be while you sit inside of the Masonic Lodge. Essentially GerardMajella, you cannot be fully human in the Lodge because the fullness of your humanity is found in Christ Jesus, whom you cannot share or offer while you are in the Lodge. That is, while in the Lodge you have to be IN someone other than Jesus Christ because to be In Christ means to share Christ at the cost of death. It also means that while you are in the Lodge Christ cannot be fully in you because in that environment He cannot give Himself away.

2b. You see, there is a spiritual dimension at work here that you have to tune your eyes into to see. The gates of Hell will never prevail against the Catholic Church, but that same promise does is not true for the Masonic Lodge or any organization outside of the Church. Therefore, while being apart of ANY organization outside of the Church your soul is always at risk in ways that you cannot imagine. The lie is a sneaky thing. It is a like a small seed that grows over time unnoticed until it has actually become a choking vine.

You are talking to a guy here whose religion was Freemasonry. It is what I practiced and it is what failed me miserably. It is true that most Masons are in it for the brotherhood and fraternity, but even with them, by virtue of hearing the teachings espoused over and over and over again the become absorbed after awhile. It is like a slow process of demonic possession.

Now, I am not saying that any number of Freemasons are possessed, but I am talking to you now, because if you can seem unable to let go of this belief that Freemasonry is harmless. It may be time for you to ask yourself the question - ‘Why can I not accept the Church’s teaching on this?’ and begin examining the stories that you have been telling yourself like this idolizing of men (George Washington and many of founding Fathers). GerardMajella, who are these men? Are they in Heaven or Hell right now? We do not know them to be saints, so why hold them up as if they had done some holy thing by being associated with Freemasonry?

Here is another story you have told yourself "the Church opposes Freemasonry for political grounds: anti-freedom, anti-public education, anti-liberty’ Is that true? I have just offered a different reason that is actually ON RECORD as to why the Church opposes Freemasonry. So we know that my answer is true - is yours? Examine it and test it. 👍

Here is another story you have told yourself, "I know better than the Church’. Brother, trust me, I am all for faithful dissent, but there is no room here for dissent of any fashion. You either accept what the Church teaches as true or you accept what the Lodge teaches as true. There is no reconciliation here. Either one is true and the other is false or they both are false, but this is not a match made in Heaven.
 
Fr. Denis Fahey was a well-known anti-semite. Apparently, he was a well-known anti-mason as well.

What I would really like to know is how you think that modern Freemasonry is in opposition to the Church. That certainly isn’t true today. It was true, perhaps, back when the Church was executing the Knights Templar under false allegations, or when the Church fought the Italian civil authorities that were promoting public education over private schooling.

Many of our Founding Fathers were Freemasons, including George Washington. It appears that the only reason why the Church opposes Freemasonry is on political grounds: anti-freedom, anti-public education, anti-liberty, etc.

Freemasonry today is apolitical. It sure would be nice to hear a rational explanation for the Church’s opposition to Freemasonry, aside from general philosophical differences (such as bringing men together of different religious faiths in fraternal brotherhood).
It is true today. A rational explanation, in a nutshell, is that they infiltrate organizations to control policy. Usually, they infiltrate organizations that are fringe groups such as communist groups, homosexual groups, etc to destroy the church and family. They foment revolution. Since it’s secret when they do this, you only see it by its fruits. For example, the 1947 Everson Case (Separation of Church and State) with the Supreme Court. All but one member of the Supreme Court were Freemasons. The one member, Sherman Minton, was a member but took himself out of it before sitting on the bench. This Supreme Court made pornography legal in 1954. I forget the name of the case. Right after that, Hugh Hefner started Playboy Magazine. I believe the reason why everything is in revolution today in the U.S. is because of this. What you have to do is look at what their stated goals are. I realize there are other groups doing the same thing today but, who knows, Freemasonry may be behind them too. Fr Fahey has been labeled an anti-semite but by whom? If something is done by a group and they all happen to be Jewish, it’s not anti-semetic to say so. It’s a mortal sin to accuse all jews of conspiracy but He wasn’t doing that. The main thing freemasonry wants to do is bring down Christian Nations and rebuild them according to man - put man at the center. I also think Joe McCarthy was right when he saw the infiltration of our government by communists and I believe freemasonry paved the way for this to be possible. Through the Venona Papers made available 50 years later, we know he was right. I can’t remember in which book I read it but one of the stated goals of Freemasonry is to regionalize the world into 7 regions and then move these regions into a one-world government without God. We see this with the Mexican border problems. I would have to re-read these books to give you specifics but this is a start. I realize this is hard to accept but it was accepted by the Catholic Church many years ago. Read Humanum Genus by Pope Leo XIII.
 
  1. Catholics are obliged NOT asked to not become members of associations that plot against the Church and it is clear from the CDF 1983 Document at the Masonic Order is one of those groups.
The Masonic Order does not actively “plot against the Church”, no moreso than the Jews, Buddhists, or any other fraternal organization “plots against the Church”.

Masonry is apolitical. You don’t see political ads from the Masons. Nor do you see them advocating for particular political candidates, liberal or conservative. Instead, Masonry is a private fraternity where members are admonished to not speak of politics nor religion in the Lodge room.
It is based solely upon the ‘Principles’ of Freemasonry, which inveigh greatly against the ‘Principles’ of the Catholic Church.
The principles of Hinduism run counter to the principles of the Catholic Church. Same with Judaism, and hundreds of other religions. Why doesn’t the Church attack these religions as well? Certainly their principles, religious practices, and belief systems do not acknowledge Christ, and advocate a different spirituality.

What about Greek fraternities on college campuses? They don’t acknowledge Christ either, and advocate promiscuity, drunkenness, and hazing rituals. Why doesn’t the Church single out these groups?

My point: The Church attacks Masonry strictly for political reasons. It has nothing whatsoever to do with spirituality. If it did, then the Church would be quite hypocritical in singling out just the Masons.

The Church didn’t like the idea of public education. They don’t like this concept for monetary reasons – it hurts their pocketbook – plus it hurts the Church’s opportunity to influence young people into the Church’s theological leanings.
2a. The keystone of those Principles of Freemasonry that inveigh against the Principles of the Catholic Church has to do with Jesus Christ.
Most Masons are Christians. In fact, the entire York Rite of Freemasonry is designed for Christian Masons.
2b. You see, there is a spiritual dimension at work here that you have to tune your eyes into to see. …Therefore, while being apart of ANY organization outside of the Church your soul is always at risk in ways that you cannot imagine. The lie is a sneaky thing.
I don’t see much “spiritual risk” in charitable and philanthropic activities, and fraternal brotherhood with like-minded men from different walks of life, the large majority of whom are Christian men of good morals. If anything, it is what Christ has called us to be: fraternal brothers, and engaged in helping others in need.
You are talking to a guy here whose religion was Freemasonry. It is what I practiced and it is what failed me miserably. …It is like a slow process of demonic possession.
You made Masonry an idol, which is no different from people that make Sunday night football an idol. Masonry isn’t to blame – Your idolatry is.

Demonic possession? Laughable. Like anything, a person can overboard in anything. Masonry is no different.

But Masonry is not to blame – In fact, in the Entered Apprentice degree, the inductee is admonished to take part in Masonry in a balanced, measured manner – not to go overboard and become obsessive over the fraternity, and instead lead a balanced life of work, rest, and devotion to God and his fellow man — and certainly never at the expense of their family or religious duties.
‘Why can I not accept the Church’s teaching on this?’ and begin examining the stories that you have been telling yourself like this idolizing of men (George Washington and many of founding Fathers).
I don’t idolize men, and certainly not George Washington. Respect perhaps, but that’s not idolizing.

I don’t accept the Church’s teaching because it is patently false, and the Church’s teaching can easily be refuted when anyone takes a moment to examine the factual evidence to the contrary.

In fact, the Church condemns Freemasonry quite unfairly, and has even gone so far as to persecute Masons throughout the ages to the point of execution, as in the case of the tragic story of the Knights Templar who were executed under false allegations.
Here is another story you have told yourself "the Church opposes Freemasonry for political grounds: anti-freedom, anti-public education, anti-liberty’ Is that true? I have just offered a different reason that is actually ON RECORD as to why the Church opposes Freemasonry. So we know that my answer is true - is yours? Examine it and test it.
Just as the Church has made moronic blunders in the past, and then later acknowledges these blunders decades later, this is another prime example where Freemasons will one day be reconciled with the Church, and the Church will finally acknowledge what the Freemasons already know to be true:

That these are good men, charitable, philanthropic, and seekers of freedom, and equality for all. That they have done more to help crippled children, the blind, and dyslexic children, than any other fraternal organization on earth. If anything, the Church should applaud the Masons, not denigrate them on political grounds.

We can agree to disagree. The Church hierarchy – not the Church faithful – has lost a great deal of its moral authority, based on its historical actions alone. Yes, I am open to listening to Church authority, but not when the Church is quite clearly in the wrong, branding millions of good, charitable men as unfaithful to the ideals of Christ.
 
We can agree to disagree. The Church hierarchy – not the Church faithful – has lost a great deal of its moral authority, based on its historical actions alone. Yes, I am open to listening to Church authority, but not when the Church is quite clearly in the wrong, branding millions of good, charitable men as unfaithful to the ideals of Christ.
I knew a Presbyterian who convinced himself that he could remarry after being divorced. He interpreted Mark and Matthew well enough to suit his beliefs. Yet, I always wondered if he would have interpreted the Scriptures a different way if he was not already remarried and knew that the correct interpretation of Mark and Matthew could cost him something to values greatly.

Likewise, you are too attached to Freemasonry to honestly make a judgement whether the Church is wrong about Her assessment of it.

And yes, I would throw my college fraternity into the same boat of association that has foundational principles that plot against the Church. 👍
 
I knew a Presbyterian who convinced himself that he could remarry after being divorced. He interpreted Mark and Matthew well enough to suit his beliefs. Yet, I always wondered if he would have interpreted the Scriptures a different way if he was not already remarried and knew that the correct interpretation of Mark and Matthew could cost him something to values greatly.
I don’t drink the Church’s Kool-Aid. My life is not run by a religious dictatorship. Instead, I have a right – and a duty – to question authority if that authority is acting irresponsibly and immorally in condemning others.

The Church, despite Catholic teaching to the contrary, is made up of men. And these men have a long history of making mistakes when it comes to decisions affecting others. Much of what the Church says is true, and should be commended. However, I am not going to live my life by automatically adhering to a Church hierarchy in another country, no less, unfamiliar with my local surroundings, making judgments and edicts that are morally unjust and unfair.

If Christ ever visited a local Masonic Lodge in my county where I live, he would praise the Lodge for its fraternal brotherhood, charitable and philanthropic giving, and community involvement to help others. And He might be quite unhappy with the Church for condemning others under false pretenses.
Likewise, you are too attached to Freemasonry to honestly make a judgement whether the Church is wrong about Her assessment of it.
In fairness, I am not that close. I just don’t buy the Church’s cover story. I honestly believe that these Church edicts are simply cover for the truth, which is that Masonry is viewed as one of the Church’s few worthy competitors, and therefore the Church decided – for political and monetary reasons – to smear the fraternity on false grounds to avoid attrition among its membership.
And yes, I would throw my college fraternity into the same boat of association that has foundational principles that plot against the Church.
I’m afraid I will be patiently waiting my entire life for the Church to write an edict condemning college Greek fraternities. Why is that?
 
The Masonic Order does not actively “plot against the Church”, no moreso than the Jews, Buddhists, or any other fraternal organization “plots against the Church”.

…]

The principles of Hinduism run counter to the principles of the Catholic Church. Same with Judaism, and hundreds of other religions. Why doesn’t the Church attack these religions as well? Certainly their principles, religious practices, and belief systems do not acknowledge Christ, and advocate a different spirituality.

What about Greek fraternities on college campuses? They don’t acknowledge Christ either, and advocate promiscuity, drunkenness, and hazing rituals. Why doesn’t the Church single out these groups?

…]

Most Masons are Christians. In fact, the entire York Rite of Freemasonry is designed for Christian Masons.
I think you’ll note that the Canon Law has been expanded to forbid membership in any organization that “plots against the church”. If it is the official philosophy of a Greek fraternity to promote sexual promiscuity (IE you must sleep around to join), then I believe that it Catholic’s would be obliged to not join. Even if just in practice, not official policy that encourages this behavior, a Catholic should have serious moral reservations about joining.

As it is, Catholics are in fact not allowed to become Jewish, Hindi, Buddhist, etc, because these faiths are incompatible with Catholic Doctrine. Catholics are also forbidden to become Anglican, Methodist, Presbyterian, or any other Protestant or Independent Christian denomination, because these run counter to Catholic Doctrine, though to a much lessor extent.

Masonry, as well intentioned and Christian its members may be, still runs counter to Catholic Doctrine. In its current form, I truly believe there are not any active conspiracies, and I’d consider it gravely wrong to hold current members responsible for any such conspiracies in the past (if such conspiracies ever existed, which I doubt). Our Knight’s of Columbus even sponsor fundraising activities with the local lodge, I believe. However, just as being member of any non-Catholic church is forbidden of Catholics, so is membership in Masonry also forbidden.
 
The Masonic Order does not actively “plot against the Church”, no moreso than the Jews, Buddhists, or any other fraternal organization “plots against the Church”.

Masonry is apolitical. You don’t see political ads from the Masons. Nor do you see them advocating for particular political candidates, liberal or conservative. Instead, Masonry is a private fraternity where members are admonished to not speak of politics nor religion in the Lodge room.

The principles of Hinduism run counter to the principles of the Catholic Church. Same with Judaism, and hundreds of other religions. Why doesn’t the Church attack these religions as well? Certainly their principles, religious practices, and belief systems do not acknowledge Christ, and advocate a different spirituality.

What about Greek fraternities on college campuses? They don’t acknowledge Christ either, and advocate promiscuity, drunkenness, and hazing rituals. Why doesn’t the Church single out these groups?

My point: The Church attacks Masonry strictly for political reasons. It has nothing whatsoever to do with spirituality. If it did, then the Church would be quite hypocritical in singling out just the Masons.

The Church didn’t like the idea of public education. They don’t like this concept for monetary reasons – it hurts their pocketbook – plus it hurts the Church’s opportunity to influence young people into the Church’s theological leanings.

Most Masons are Christians. In fact, the entire York Rite of Freemasonry is designed for Christian Masons.

I don’t see much “spiritual risk” in charitable and philanthropic activities, and fraternal brotherhood with like-minded men from different walks of life, the large majority of whom are Christian men of good morals. If anything, it is what Christ has called us to be: fraternal brothers, and engaged in helping others in need.

You made Masonry an idol, which is no different from people that make Sunday night football an idol. Masonry isn’t to blame – Your idolatry is.

Demonic possession? Laughable. Like anything, a person can overboard in anything. Masonry is no different.

But Masonry is not to blame – In fact, in the Entered Apprentice degree, the inductee is admonished to take part in Masonry in a balanced, measured manner – not to go overboard and become obsessive over the fraternity, and instead lead a balanced life of work, rest, and devotion to God and his fellow man — and certainly never at the expense of their family or religious duties.

I don’t idolize men, and certainly not George Washington. Respect perhaps, but that’s not idolizing.

I don’t accept the Church’s teaching because it is patently false, and the Church’s teaching can easily be refuted when anyone takes a moment to examine the factual evidence to the contrary.

In fact, the Church condemns Freemasonry quite unfairly, and has even gone so far as to persecute Masons throughout the ages to the point of execution, as in the case of the tragic story of the Knights Templar who were executed under false allegations.

Just as the Church has made moronic blunders in the past, and then later acknowledges these blunders decades later, this is another prime example where Freemasons will one day be reconciled with the Church, and the Church will finally acknowledge what the Freemasons already know to be true:

That these are good men, charitable, philanthropic, and seekers of freedom, and equality for all. That they have done more to help crippled children, the blind, and dyslexic children, than any other fraternal organization on earth. If anything, the Church should applaud the Masons, not denigrate them on political grounds.

We can agree to disagree. The Church hierarchy – not the Church faithful – has lost a great deal of its moral authority, based on its historical actions alone. Yes, I am open to listening to Church authority, but not when the Church is quite clearly in the wrong, branding millions of good, charitable men as unfaithful to the ideals of Christ.
It’s true that the average freemason is good and does charitable works. I’ve had relatives who were freemasons and they were good men, however, it’s a fact that freemasonry has warred with the church thorughout that last 200 years outwardly. They were responsible for the French Revolution, the Revolution of 1848 and the takeover of the Papal States in 1879-80. The church gathered information in various ways that prove who was behind these revolutions. They are also behind the promotion of the modern philosophies that concretely were put into effect on society such as communism and secularism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top