Sending it to the top so more people can see the article.
Didn’t Compton already cover the wives of JS?
This book isn’t just about Joseph Smith’s polygamy.Didn’t Compton already cover the wives of JS?
I might check it out to see which of my crazy ancestors are listed.
So, if they do, do we get to expel them from the Union?Polygamy is still a doctrine of the LDS Church. It is not a doctrine that is practiced at this time, but you never know, the Mormon god just might fire it up again anytime.
It will probably be legal along with gay marriage within the next 25 years anyway. The young people in this country are beginning to accept almost anything these days – libertarianism is the wave of the future I’m afraid.So, if they do, do we get to expel them from the Union?![]()
Have you read it, or are you just randomly slamming something you know nothing about?Here is an interesting tidbit from the article:
“I guess I was intrigued by the obvious forgetting,” said the author, whose research is largely based on documents and diaries held in the Mormon church archives.
The above quotation seems contradictory.
The book seems like a hack job about mormon polygamy. The tone that it sets is antimormon. And it will only get worse as the lds church makes an impact in American society, ie, proposition 8 in California.
The only official party line that might hold muster is “Polygamy had economic advantages to all of the parties.”The official party line is that “few people practiced polygamy” or “there were more women than men”, both of which are not supported by demographic facts.
Legalization of polygamy would probably simplify Utah’s divorce law to: “No divorce without the approval of the President”.It will probably be legal along with gay marriage
Libertarianism demands something that Americans have rejected — Freedom.libertarianism is the wave of the future
Unless in the case of my greatX5-grandfather who died young, leaving 5 widows and a dozen or so minor children with no provider.The only official party line that might hold muster is “Polygamy had economic advantages to all of the parties.”
jonathon
The younger men and the powerless men always lose out with polygamy. There are not enough women to go around.Unless in the case of my greatX5-grandfather who died young, leaving 5 widows and a dozen or so minor children with no provider.
We see that today in the plight of the “lost boys”, those teenage boys who are kicked out of polygamous communities like the FLDS so that they will not be able to compete with the older men for young girls.The younger men and the powerless men always lose out with polygamy. There are not enough women to go around.
And in Brigham Young’s time when missionaries were converting young women, and marrying them right off. The men in high places in SLC complained that nothing was being left for them.We see that today in the plight of the “lost boys”, those teenage boys who are kicked out of polygamous communities like the FLDS so that they will not be able to compete with the older men for young girls.
Here’s an exact quote on that, from LDS apostle Heber C. Kimball:And in Brigham Young’s time when missionaries were converting young women, and marrying them right off. The men in high places in SLC complained that nothing was being left for them.
You just gotta love ol’ Heber. He was also the one who said:Speaking to a group of departing missionaries… “Brethren, I want you to understand that it is not to be as it has been heretofore. The brother missionaries have been in the habit of picking out the prettiest women for themselves before they get here, and bringing on the ugly ones for us; hereafter you have to bring them all here before taking any of them, and let us all have a fair shake.” - Apostle Heber C. Kimball, The Lion of the Lord, New York, 1969, pp.129-30.
“I think no more of taking another wife than I do of buying a cow.” - Apostle Heber C. Kimball, The Twenty Seventh Wife, Irving Wallace, p. 101.