New heart and the mosaic law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bdonoho
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back to the original post… sorry I side tracked the discussion.
Within the church that takes Paul as authorative, and accepts the incarnation and the trinity, then you would have to say that Jesus created a new convenant which removed the need for the old completely. Therefore the prophets speak of a future coming of the messiah and this future convenant instituted at the last supper. Jesus does say I come to fulfill the Law not abolish it, but this is at odds with Paul in Galatians. Jesus doesn’t spell out his theology in detail like Paul does. So if both Jesus and Paul are authoritative you would go in this case with Paul because he is more explicit on the topic.

In general, it seems that Christianity uses Jesus’ teachings to interpret the Torah and use Paul to interpret Jesus. You would say that these interpretations were there all along just given in the proper teaching.

Was that a fair summary of the church’s position?
 
Back to the original post… sorry I side tracked the discussion.
Within the church that takes Paul as authorative, and accepts the incarnation and the trinity, then you would have to say that Jesus created a new convenant which removed the need for the old completely. Therefore the prophets speak of a future coming of the messiah and this future convenant instituted at the last supper. Jesus does say I come to fulfill the Law not abolish it, but this is at odds with Paul in Galatians. Jesus doesn’t spell out his theology in detail like Paul does. So if both Jesus and Paul are authoritative you would go in this case with Paul because he is more explicit on the topic.

In general, it seems that Christianity uses Jesus’ teachings to interpret the Torah and use Paul to interpret Jesus. You would say that these interpretations were there all along just given in the proper teaching.

Was that a fair summary of the church’s position?
Paul didn’t deny that the Law still needed to be fulfilled. It’s now to be upheld-but via faith:
** “Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law.”** Rom 3:31
And so the church teaches, along with Scripture, that the Old Covenant wasn’t revoked, just made obsolete by a new and better covenant.
 
Back to the original post… sorry I side tracked the discussion.
Within the church that takes Paul as authorative, and accepts the incarnation and the trinity, then you would have to say that Jesus created a new convenant which removed the need for the old completely. Therefore the prophets speak of a future coming of the messiah and this future convenant instituted at the last supper. Jesus does say I come to fulfill the Law not abolish it, but this is at odds with Paul in Galatians. Jesus doesn’t spell out his theology in detail like Paul does. So if both Jesus and Paul are authoritative you would go in this case with Paul because he is more explicit on the topic.

In general, it seems that Christianity uses Jesus’ teachings to interpret the Torah and use Paul to interpret Jesus. You would say that these interpretations were there all along just given in the proper teaching.

Was that a fair summary of the church’s position?
Hi, Fred!

…the problem you are having is that you are viewing God’s Revelation as distinct and individual levels or parts…

It is not.

Forget Paul!.. here’s what St. Paul says about himself:
9 For I am the least of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God, I am what I am; and his grace in me hath not been void, but I have laboured more abundantly than all they: yet not I, but the grace of God with me.
(1 Corinthians 15:9-10)
His career as a Christian began from a devout persecution of the Church Founded by Christ.

…what is that Church? …as I understand it, it comes from the Greek: ekklesia (εκκλησία); which actually meant: community.

Now, this Community Founded by Christ cannot be separate from God’s Plan; it cannot be an invention of Paul; it cannot be an insertion of Paul; it must be a Revelation of God Actualized.

…and it is!

Do you recall the Promise?

Abram met with Yahweh God Who, on His Name Vowed to make him the father of many nations (no not only the tribes of Israel); these nations would number as the stars in the Heavens and the sand on the shore (billions!)… but that Promise was not just a promise of many offspring but of One Offspring…

This Promise is Yahweh God’s Salvific Plan.

…the first steps… if you recall Abraham and Sarah were old… Sarah had been sterile from youth… so upon hearing about the Promise they took it upon themselves to procure it… wrong! God’s Design was not to be actualized through chance… so the human effort alone would not do. While Ismael was technically Abraham’s firstborn; he was not accepted by Yahweh God. His Promise required His direct Intervention: Isaac.

…this lead to Joseph and him to Ephraim… to Jesus–well so how does that fit with the Davidic kingdom?:
9 And he gathered together all Juda and Benjamin, and the strangers with them of Ephraim, and Manasses, and Simeon: for many were come over to him out of Israel, seeing that the Lord his God was with him.
(2 Chronicles 15 9)
The Promise is patent. It is Revealed through Moses:
15 The Lord thy God will raise up to thee a PROPHET of thy nation and of thy brethren like unto me: him thou shalt hear:
18 I will raise them up a prophet out of the midst of their brethren like to thee: and I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I shall command him. 19 And he that will not hear his words, which he shall speak in my name, I will be the revenger.
(Deuteronomy 18:15, 18-19)
(Note the type/mirroring: Moses: high priest, prophet, king and onto Aaron (Israel) like a god >> Jesus: High Priest, Prophet, King of kings, Lord of lords, God.)

The Promise encompasses the whole world:
1 “Here is my servant, whom I uphold,
my chosen one in whom I delight;
I will put my Spirit on him,
and he will bring justice to the nations…
4 he will not falter or be discouraged
till he establishes justice on earth.
In his teaching the islands will put their hope.”
(Isaiah 42:1-4)
…the change that you see in Revelation/Worship did not originate from St. Paul; if anyone is to blame, you must blame Cephas… but if you blame Cephas you must go to the source: Jesus:
21 “Woman,” Jesus replied, “believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. 22 You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”
(St. John 4:41-24)
…there’s no contradiction in Scriptures and there’s no contradiction in God’s Revelation:
4 For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love… 9 he made known to us the mystery of his will according to his good pleasure, which he purposed in Christ, 10 to be put into effect when the times reach their fulfillment—to bring unity to all things in heaven and on earth under Christ.
(Ephesians 1:4-10)
Maran atha!

Angel
 
Hi, B!

…I can’t recall a single passage where the New Covenant Economy is spelled out; however, there are plenty of passages warning against Israel’s adulterous heart and stubbornness; there are passages that warn that Israel shall no longer be called “my people” and that the pagans/gentiles would be His “new people.”

Here’s one particular passage that hits on this issue:

…consider this in the light of:

…which brings us to:

…which then takes us to Jesus’ Revelation:

Maran atha!

Angel
According to Romans Paul specifically said that the Jews are not forgotten and will be restored when the time of the gentiles is past. If the Jewish people were utterly cast off then it would deny the explicit promises to restore Israel that came from both prophets you mentioned. Isaiah and Jeremiah prophesied a great disciplining of the Jews, but I recall so many more passages that affirm that God will not completely forsake his people. Paul said that we gentiles are a wild branch grafted into the trunk, not a new tree that’s been planted after the old one was set aside
 
According to Romans Paul specifically said that the Jews are not forgotten and will be restored when the time of the gentiles is past. If the Jewish people were utterly cast off then it would deny the explicit promises to restore Israel that came from both prophets you mentioned. Isaiah and Jeremiah prophesied a great disciplining of the Jews, but I recall so many more passages that affirm that God will not completely forsake his people. Paul said that we gentiles are a wild branch grafted into the trunk, not a new tree that’s been planted after the old one was set aside
Hi, B!

I don’t recall wording it that way (cast off); rather, that there would come a time when Israel, (Jacob, my firstborn) would be called not my people and the ones that were called not my people would be called my people.

…now, if we take the passage to which you’ve alluded, I think it supports this (even your argument does: till the full number of the gentiles):
25 I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, 26 and in this way all Israel will be saved. As it is written:
“The deliverer will come from Zion;
he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
27 And this is my covenant with them
when I take away their sins.”
28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30 Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now receive mercy as a result of God’s mercy to you. 32 For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.
(Romans 11:25-32)
…clearly, this demonstrate a change in economy; it also demonstrates that there is change that will occur with the method of Worship and that Israel will be allowed to move away from Yahweh God.

Here’s the difference in understanding: while Jesus states that nothing is more powerful than God and that nothing can remove from God’s Protection those He Protects… Jesus is not stating that those who enjoy God’s Protection cannot willingly choose to leave His Protection.

Now, does rejection of God mean that Salvation is forever lost?

Salvation is God’s Free Gift–His Gift, as Scriptures state, is irrevocable! This means that the Promise made to Abraham remains patent even and in spite of Israel’s determination to reject God.

At the fullness of the Salvific Plan, Israel will be Called back to God, given a new heart and a new spirit:
26 I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh. 27 And I will put my Spirit in you and move you to follow my decrees and be careful to keep my laws.
(Ezekiel 36:26-27)
…again, we see a new Economy taking place.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Not murdering, stealing nor lending at exploitative interest rates are ways to love neighbor. Do you have to do it the way the Rabbis say, can you show your love in other ways? Yes, probably. But for me, the “old” law is an excellent place to start.
Did Spinoza hate Jews? Our older brothers remain God’s chosen and ain’t that peculiar? You state the law as what is not to be done against your brother. Then God is the other side of the coin.

This heart Jesus proclaims to us is that fulfillment of the Mosaic Law. Rabbinic Judaism is another matter. Your message speaks well of God’s mercy. Yet much is missing when Christ, God’s own Son, is not understood as the essence of this mercy. Uphold what is right and just, truly. Truth is found in doing justice and Jesus is there when God is present. I hope that you find Him in seeking God.
 
Did Spinoza hate Jews? Our older brothers remain God’s chosen and ain’t that peculiar? You state the law as what is not to be done against your brother. Then God is the other side of the coin.

This heart Jesus proclaims to us is that fulfillment of the Mosaic Law. Rabbinic Judaism is another matter. Your message speaks well of God’s mercy. Yet much is missing when Christ, God’s own Son, is not understood as the essence of this mercy. Uphold what is right and just, truly. Truth is found in doing justice and Jesus is there when God is present. I hope that you find Him in seeking God.
Strange coincidence that I have just been reading Spinoza. I was reading Tillich actually and from there picked up Spinoza’s ethics. It’s helped me step back a bit from Rabbinical Judaism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top