mlchance:
Which doesn’t actually refute my point.
The man hasn’t become a woman. He has paid physicians to mutilate his body so that he can live a lie. While I’m certainly not advocating persecuting such a man, I also feel no desire to lend any air of legitimacy to his very tragic choice.
– Mark L. Chance.
I understand your point is ‘correct’, and am not refuting that.
What I question is how working so hard NOT to lend an air of legitimacy to this person’s choice meets the goal of showing compassion for a person obviously in a struggling situation?
Here’s what goes through my mind:
Kid comes home, mom explains the situation to the kid, emphasizing this person has mutilated his body as an offense to God and has to go to confession for it. Kid understands, goes to school…
The gossip mill is in full force for the kid…everyone’s talking about this person…
Does the child, based on how his/her parent addressed the situation:
a) listen to the conversation, but does not participate
b) try to keep any discrimination/bias toward this person to a minimum by reminding the kid doing the talking that it isn’t good to talk about a person in that manner
c) use the opportunity to share Catholic teaching, emphazing the need for everyone there to be compassionate and charitable toward this person who is obviously struggling with a serious issue
d) use the opportunity to share Catholic teaching, emphasizing how damned to hell this person is unless he repents for his sins.
And then the kid comes home to share how his day went but the parent cuts off the conversation when the topic comes to Teacher X/Y either because the parent says “I don’t want that subject brought into this home, it’s bad enough it’s at your school”, or by going off on a tangent to again reemphasize how bad a state of sin this person is in.