C
ConstantineTG
Guest
Where can I get the text for the entire new Missal including the parts of the priests and any variable parts?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
J
japhy
Guest
Four PDF documents comprising the Roman Missal can be found at “WikiSpooks”. This does appear to be the real deal, discounting any errata that need to be cleared up before it can go to print.
P
ProVobis
Guest
There is no new Missal. There will be a new English translation of the existing OF Missal.entire new Missal
C
ConstantineTG
Guest
Awesome! Thanks!Four PDF documents comprising the Roman Missal can be found at “WikiSpooks”. This does appear to be the real deal, discounting any errata that need to be cleared up before it can go to print.
C
CKA
Guest
I don’t think its complete yet.
We have started implementing the new translations for the congregation responses in the english mass here in New Zealand but Australia hasn’t yet.
And there is another change to come for the priests later this year. Some countries are choosing not to do it till the entire new translation is issued.
We have started implementing the new translations for the congregation responses in the english mass here in New Zealand but Australia hasn’t yet.
And there is another change to come for the priests later this year. Some countries are choosing not to do it till the entire new translation is issued.
L
laszlo
Guest
here is a quite critical article about the wikispooks leaking from Fr Z
wdtprs.com/blog/2010/11/the-new-roman-missal-leaked-online-for-your-perusal/
wdtprs.com/blog/2010/11/the-new-roman-missal-leaked-online-for-your-perusal/
J
japhy
Guest
Fr. Z isn’t being critical of the leak, or of the leaked text. He’s relaying someone else’s critique of the new translation itself. A critique which is pretty spot-on. The text we had back in 2008 has gone through a bit of a meat grinder since then, to the disappointment of many.here is a quite critical article about the wikispooks leaking from Fr Z
wdtprs.com/blog/2010/11/the-new-roman-missal-leaked-online-for-your-perusal/
P
ProVobis
Guest
I’m still hung up on “Dominus vobiscum” being rendered into the subjunctive “God be with you.” Why “be” when He already “is” with you? My reasoning: If the subjunctive were meant, then “sit” would be used, such as it’s used elsewhere: “Pax sit semper vobiscum,” for example. And don’t get me started on “Sursum corda” (upwards hearts) and that’s the way Polish translates it. No lifting. Is it necessary to comply with the old Cranmer translations?
As the number of Latin scholars is growing, perhaps we can just bring back some of the Latin in the Latin-promulgated OF Mass?
As the number of Latin scholars is growing, perhaps we can just bring back some of the Latin in the Latin-promulgated OF Mass?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.