New practice??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phemie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Phemie

Guest
This morning I attended Mass in my daughter’s parish and was puzzled to see the altar server standing at the side during communion, holding a small plastic container with what looked like little white crackers, not hosts but thick, square 1/2"x1/2" crackers.

Later on I noticed that children too young to receive Communion were coming down with their parents holding on to these crackers. Surely that is forbidden by RS 96:
[96.] The practice is reprobated whereby either unconsecrated hosts or other edible or inedible things are distributed during the celebration of Holy Mass or beforehand after the manner of Communion, contrary to the prescriptions of the liturgical books. For such a practice in no way accords with the tradition of the Roman Rite, and carries with it the danger of causing confusion among Christ’s faithful concerning the Eucharistic doctrine of the Church. Where there exists in certain places by concession a particular custom of blessing bread after Mass for distribution, proper catechesis should very carefully be given concerning this action. In fact, no other similar practices should be introduced, nor should unconsecrated hosts ever be used for this purpose.
Has anyone ever seen that in their parish or one they were visiting?
 
What you saw was reprobated, just as you posted in RS. You might want to ask your daughter what her pastor’s name is and then maybe drop a friendly little letter asking just what in the world that gesture was meant to represent?

If you want to give kids crackers, do it after Mass. Don’t confuse them.
 
**
If you want to give kids crackers, do it after Mass. Don’t confuse them.**

Even better, adopt the Eastern discipline of giving Communion to children from the time they are baptized!
 
This morning I attended Mass in my daughter’s parish and was puzzled to see the altar server standing at the side during communion, holding a small plastic container with what looked like little white crackers, not hosts but thick, square 1/2"x1/2" crackers. … Later on I noticed that children too young to receive Communion were coming down with their parents holding on to these crackers. Surely that is forbidden by RS 96
:eek: 😦

I’ve never seen that, but it’s really really inappropriate, not to mention specifically prohibited by the Church. Please talk to your pastor soon.
 
See how “Left” and “PC” we think we have to be? Ridiculous!!
Now when they grow up how much reverence do you think they will have for the Eucharist? A lot less I bet.

Paul
 
what is the documents full name that you are quoting from? I do not know what you mean by RS.
 
what is the documents full name that you are quoting from? I do not know what you mean by RS.

RS-2004 is the following document. Here is the link to the document from the Vatican site.

vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20040423_redemptionis-sacramentum_en.html

CONGREGATION FOR DIVINE WORSHIP
AND THE DISCIPLINE OF THE SACRAMENT
INSTRUCTION

Redemptionis Sacramentum

On certain matters to be observed or to be avoided
regarding the Most Holy Eucharist
 
Oh dear, oh dear.

I am 99% certain that whoever instituted this gesture was absolutely convinced that it was 'the right and proper thing to do."

That it was ‘involving the children’.
Teaching them ‘what to expect when they were old enough to receive.’
Being ‘inclusive’ for those who could not receive.

And this is why the ‘rubrics’ (the rules) involving Mass --that seem so trivial to some because they have not imagined something like this ever being dreamed up and instituted in a Catholic Church–need to be followed, and ‘cool ideas’ of putting something ‘to help’ in the liturgy need to be abrogated tout de suite.

OK: Now the scenario below is just an opinion here. OK? I am not saying this is ‘how it happens’, I am not accusing any particular person. It is an example–not an indictment per se. It is simply what I can ‘imagine’ would be the thoughts going on in a family in this particular situation. OK?

Just a lovely, lovely gesture meant to keep people from having hurt feelings if they, or little Buffy or Alastair, could not receive. I mean, little Buffy and Alastair might not be ‘old enough’ for the Eucharist, but how do you expect a poor mother to handle their trembling lips and shrill. . .I mean, PIPING little voices asking, "Mommy? Daddy? Why can’t have what cousin Muffy and uncle Rupert have? Am I a BAD LITTLE GIRL/BOY? What is wrong with me, Mommy? I thought JESUS LOVED ME. . .but I guess (sob) He doesn’t. … "

But now Buffy and Alastair and all their little chums can get a cracker. They get to stand in line just like everybody else, and take something from the big old grownup like everybody else and eat it just like everybody else.

And when it is time for First Communion, what do you think Buffy and Alastair are thinking (or even saying)?

That’s JESUS? Heck no. I’ve been eating crackers for years. Now it’s supposed to be JESUS? Who are you kidding? This is what all the fuss was about? You’re joking. If it was Jesus, why did you let me think it was crackers all that time? If it’s so special, why did you trivialize it?

Oh well, Mom and Dad spent money for this sacrament (class). I’ll eat the cracker. But as I grow up, I’m not gonna be bothered to come here and sit through a bunch of people blah-blahing and wait in line for some dumb cracker. I’m 7 years old now and I’ve already wasted time on crackers. I’d rather stay in bed. There’s nothing here I need anyway."

Welcome to what could be the early thoughts of the (estimated) 60 to 70% of self-identified Catholics who think that the Eucharist is. . .a cracker. A ‘symbol’ of Jesus. . .but not Jesus.
 
It just gets worse and worse. And, the progressives will tell you its a good thing because no one feels left out.

I just don’t get it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top