News article ....28 year old male seeks sex with boys- what is he?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gam197
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gam197

Guest
The correct term is simply pedophile. It has less to do with which gender he’s attracted to and mainly the fact that he’s attracted to children. I’m guessing he probably wouldn’t want adult males any more than adult females, so not strictly homosexual in the traditional definition.
 
This is just another instance of some in the media failing to call the obvious for what it is. Let’s be clear about this: it is homosexual activity. This is the sort of behavior we have seen people with same-sex attractions engage in time and time again. The incidence of this sort of behavior among men who have sex with men is shocking. There is such a high potential for this sort of predation among people with same-sex attraction that the Church has wisely moved to prohibit such people from serving Christ at the altar irrespective of whether or not they have ever acted on it.

This man is nothing other than a sadly typical example of a man with same-sex attraction. All the rationalization and spinning in the world cannot change this into anything other than the loathsome truth that it is.
 
Homosexual is someone who is attracted to someone of the same sex,
Paedophile is someone thats attracted to a child regardless of the sex of that child.
This man is a paedophile its more about the fact that hes attracted to a boy and not a man that makes him this, if this boy was a consenting adult it would make this man a homosexual.
As this man is attracted to a boy someone he can clearly take advantage of it makes this man a paedophile.
 
LilyM said:
The correct term is simply pedophile. It has less to do with which gender he’s attracted to and mainly the fact that he’s attracted to children. I’m guessing he probably wouldn’t want adult males any more than adult females, so not strictly homosexual in the traditional definition.
Click to expand...
I don’t think 14-15 year olds qualify as “children”, ceratinly not sexually. It’s not really pedophilia, any more than when a teacher has an affair with a 14 or 15 year old girl (or these days, boy).

I think this is clearly homosexual predation.

God Bless
 
bilop said:
I don’t think 14-15 year olds qualify as “children”, ceratinly not sexually. It’s not really pedophilia, any more than when a teacher has an affair with a 14 or 15 year old girl (or these days, boy).

I think this is clearly homosexual predation.

God Bless
Click to expand...
I have to disagree with that im afraid someone who is under the legal age of consent is a child, the fact that this man seeks out boys and not men is clearly an act of paedophilia.
It would be the same if it was a girl of that age thats why some people can get charged with statutory rape it is because the child is below the age of consent, and when a teacher has an affair with a 15 or 14 year old it is not just about paedophilia or statutory rape but it is also an abuse of power.
 
The term for an adult with strong sexual attraction to postpubescent adolescents is ephebophilia. I believe it is more of an immature form of homosexuality than a gender specific form of pedophilia attraction for older children.
 
Tracy07 said:
I have to disagree with that im afraid someone who is under the legal age of consent is a child, the fact that this man seeks out boys and not men is clearly an act of paedophilia.
It would be the same if it was a girl of that age thats why some people can get charged with statutory rape it is because the child is below the age of consent, and when a teacher has an affair with a 15 or 14 year old it is not just about paedophilia or statutory rape but it is also an abuse of power.
Click to expand...
I’m not saying it’s not wrong, but it’s not pedophilia. These boys are sexually mature.

God bless
 
bilop said:
I’m not saying it’s not wrong, but it’s not pedophilia. These boys are sexually mature.

God bless
Click to expand...
How is a boy sexually mature though?
And how do we define sexual maturity? many people are not sexually mature in adult hood never mind in childhood.
The consent age is there for a reason to protect the young and vulnerable if someone is interested in a child no matter what the age that person is a paedophile.
It is not merely two boys of a similar age experimenting, this man is 28 years of age actively seeking out boys for sex, boys who are boys not men, they might seem mature and at 14 15 16 we all like to think we are mature but looking back on life as a 28 year old now i can tell you i certainly wasnt so how can these boys be?
🙂
x
 
Tracy07 said:
I have to disagree with that im afraid someone who is under the legal age of consent is a child, the fact that this man seeks out boys and not men is clearly an act of paedophilia.
It would be the same if it was a girl of that age thats why some people can get charged with statutory rape it is because the child is below the age of consent, and when a teacher has an affair with a 15 or 14 year old it is not just about paedophilia or statutory rape but it is also an abuse of power.
Click to expand...
The problem with this is that thoughout much of history teens were seen as adults. People in their mid to late teens married and raised a family. It’s only been recently that the age has moved up and even then not in all nations. In this country a 14 yr old can get his motocycle license. A 15 1/2 yr old can get his drivers permits. These are things that are considered a sign of approaching adulthood and things that children can not do. Plus depending on the state 16 yr olds can get married. That’s only a year away from a 15 yr old. I don’t see how this age group can be considered “child”. They are way too close if not actually in the category of “young adult”.
 
bilop said:
I don’t think 14-15 year olds qualify as “children”, ceratinly not sexually. It’s not really pedophilia, any more than when a teacher has an affair with a 14 or 15 year old girl (or these days, boy).

I think this is clearly homosexual predation.

God Bless
Click to expand...
I agree. I may have to go back and look to see if the definition of ‘pedophile’ has changed. I wouldn’t be surprised if the definition has changed to not include any aspect of homosexuality when adults abuse children of the same sex. It would just be another way of enculturating society into believing that same sex attraction is healthy and natural. Either way, it truly disgusts me when adults harm children in any way.
 
Monkey Friend say totally disgusting. Monkeys much more civilized. 🙂
 
Tracy07 said:
How is a boy sexually mature though?
And how do we define sexual maturity?
x
Click to expand...
When you can reproduce and are fully developed you are considered sexual mature by most defintions. For most people this happens in their mid to late teens.

A 28 yr old is no where near as mature as a 50 yr old. Maturity is not something that comes with adulthood. It is something that comes with knowledge and experience. There is no magic age (like 18) that makes you an adult.
 
Sabda said:
The problem with this is that thoughout much of history teens were seen as adults. People in their mid to late teens married and raised a family. It’s only been recently that the age has moved up and even then not in all nations. In this country a 14 yr old can get his motocycle license. A 15 1/2 yr old can get his drivers permits. These are things that are considered a sign of approaching adulthood and things that children can not do. Plus depending on the state 16 yr olds can get married. That’s only a year away from a 15 yr old. I don’t see how this age group can be considered “child”. They are way too close if not actually in the category of “young adult”.
Click to expand...
They are seen as children until they are of legal age to have sex and even then i think a 28 year old should not be having sex with someone barely over the age of consent.
I understand what you are saying about late teens raising a family etc i was 17 when i had my first child so know all too well the things that are considered a sign of approaching adulthood and it is a fine line between 15 and 16 you are right but until that child is 16 or whatever the age of consent is where you live then that child is still a child and there is no way round that.
It completely baffles me why someone of the age of 28 would want to have anything to do with someone who is 15 anyways i know what i was like at fifteen and looking back now i can hardly say i was mature in body or mind.
 
Sabda said:
When you can reproduce and are fully developed you are considered sexual mature by most defintions. For most people this happens in their mid to late teens.

A 28 yr old is no where near as mature as a 50 yr old. Maturity is not something that comes with adulthood. It is something that comes with knowledge and experience. There is no magic age (like 18) that makes you an adult.
Click to expand...
I was young when i had my child i wouldnt say i was sexually mature, for me sexually mature is about knowing your body and understanding it and in mid to late teens im sorry but you dont.
Someone can have many sexual partners and still not know and understand their body so how can someone who is barely old enough to have sex?
You are right a 28 yr old is nowhere near as mature as a 50 year old but neither is a 15 yr old to a 28 yr old, maturity is something that goes hand in hand with experience and life experience and a 15 does not have that not in most cases anyway.
There is no magic age you are right but at least wait until that child is of legal age and knows what their getting into before getting involved is all im saying
🙂
 
Tracy07 said:
I was young when i had my child i wouldnt say i was sexually mature, for me sexually mature is about knowing your body and understanding it… 🙂
Click to expand...
The problem with that is there are people who are in their 20’s and up who do not know their own bodies. Does that mean that they are not sexually mature? Would you consider them to still be children because they are not sexually mature?

“Legal age” is subjective. 😃
 
Sabda said:
The problem with that is there are people who are in their 20’s and up who do not know their own bodies. Does that mean that they are not sexually mature? Would you consider them to still be children because they are not sexually mature?

“Legal age” is subjective. 😃
Click to expand...
I wasnt the one who raised the issue of sexual maturity in the first place someone else said that ‘these boys were sexually mature’ i merely asked them how do you define sexual maturity.
You then replied about your view on sexual maturity and i gave you mine, my original point is that these boys are children and no they are not sexually mature but what this man is doing is not just about sexual maturity it is about an abuse of power as i have said before anyone below the legal age of consent is a child and if you have sex with someone under the age then you are breaking the law and abusing your power as an adult espescially at the age of 28.
Of course we see it every day a 16 and a 15 year old having sex and yes granted that can be different but that 16 year old is still in the eyes of the law having sex with a minor and can be put in prison for statutory rape the law is there to protect vulnerable children.
Whilst i agree that legal age is subjective in this case a man of 28 having sex with boys isnt, this man has had life experiences and possibly many relationships and learnt and grown as a person all im saying is allow a child to have that same life before taking advantage and abusing your power as a grown up.
My child knows all about sex and the human bodies but i certainly wouldnt say he was in any way shape or form sexually mature or ready for a sexual relationship just because someone knows about sex doesnt mean they are ready for it.
😃
x
 
Tracy07 said:
There is no magic age you are right but at least wait until that child is of legal age and knows what their getting into before getting involved is all im saying
🙂
Click to expand...
Tracy,

Sabda and I are not saying that this behavior is OK, that’s the furthest thing from our mind. We’re just saying that to call it pedophilia is a mistake. This type of predator is not attracted to children (the sexually immature). He is attracted to sexually mature teens. Just like some men are attracted to 15-16 year old girls.

To call it pedophilia is to minimize homosexual predation of this type, which seems to be quite common. The core of the priest abuse scandal was homosexual priests preying on teen age boys.

Again, this behavior is wrong, but is a separate type of sexual predation; not pedophilia.

God Bless
 
bilop said:
Tracy,

Sabda and I are not saying that this behavior is OK, that’s the furthest thing from our mind. We’re just saying that to call it pedophilia is a mistake. This type of predator is not attracted to children (the sexually immature). He is attracted to sexually mature teens. Just like some men are attracted to 15-16 year old girls.

To call it pedophilia is to minimize homosexual predation of this type, which seems to be quite common. The core of the priest abuse scandal was homosexual priests preying on teen age boys.

Again, this behavior is wrong, but is a separate type of sexual predation; not pedophilia.

God Bless
Click to expand...
Hi there i know you have not said this behaviour is ok and of course you see it as wrong, but again i have to disagree with you teens whether they be sexually mature or not are children, there not adults are they? so in my view they are children.
I dont think for one moment calling it paedophilia is minimizing homesexual predatation of course this man has homosexual tendencies because he is seeking out someone of the same sex but he is also seeking out young underage boys for his own sexual pleasure.
How can calling it paedophilia minimize homosexual predatation? in my book its worse because not only is he seeking someone of the same sex out but it is a child he is seeking.
It would be at least two consenting adults if he was seeking out a man around his own age but the very fact that this man is not and is looking for young teen boys is legally and morally wrong 🙂
god bless
x
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top