News Story--"Italian Woman Marries Herself, Saying, 'My Happiness Doesn't Depend On a Man.'"

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Correction, it does not come close to your feminist opinion of what a Catholic marriage should be.
 
Last edited:
Correction – a “red-piller” doesn’t come close to having a marriage in the Lord. The “red-pill” may even be an impediment to marriage and/or affect validity.
 
You wrote off just about every marriage before the metastasis of feminism.
 
Last edited:
If all the previous married men where like you – it would be cause for concern.
 
If you are going to start launching personal attacks, use proper grammar and spelling please.

If you read enough feminist writing, it is pretty clear that all men were allegedly part of a cabal that had the sole goal of “oppressing” women. Some of us still have that goal. 😉

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Last edited:
A 35+ year old woman with a string of previous sex partners and possibly someone else’s kid. She is gonna make you wait for sex unlike every other partner and one suspects that the quantity and quality will both be subpar too. Throw in the fact that any kids you have are more likely to have birth defects, and we have not even touched on the legal or social ramifications yet.
Other things aside, I think one might find there are a lot more Catholic women who have been chaste than you think.

The trouble is most redpill types I’ve talked to don’t have anything to offer to a woman who’s looking for a partner and not a meal ticket. If all you’ve got to offer is your paycheck, don’t be surprised if you only get woman looking for a paycheck.
 
With God’s help – the Church is working on “patriarchy” too.
Apostolic Trip of the Holy Father Francis in Colombia (6-11 September 2017) – Holy Mass and Beatification in Villavicencio, 08.09.2017

The mention of women – though none of those referred to in the genealogy has the category of the great women of the Old Testament – allows us a particular rapprochement: it is they, in the genealogy, who tell us that pagan blood runs through the veins of Jesus, and who recall the stories of scorn and subjugation. In communities where we are still weighed down with patriarchal and chauvinistic customs, it is good to note that the Gospel begins by highlighting women who were influential and made history.
 
Other things aside, I think one might find there are a lot more Catholic women who have been chaste than you think.
Right…
The trouble is most redpill types I’ve talked to don’t have anything to offer to a woman who’s looking for a partner and not a meal ticket. If all you’ve got to offer is your paycheck, don’t be surprised if you only get woman looking for a paycheck.
That is what we call betabux. Not a good place to be.
 
Last edited:
That is we call betabux. Not a good place to be
And what does your “alpha” who wants to settle down with a woman and have a family actually offer? I’ve never really seen the point of most of these guys if you’re not looking to have casual sex. They complain about “betabux”, but every redpill guy that I’ve read, the only thing these so-called “alphas” are offering is the privilege of being supported by them and some mysterious “thrill” that apparently all women want?

I know some women who want that, but it’s certainly not all or even most. It is however a lot more of the kind of women who are willing to sleep around. Methinks a lot of redpill guys have a bad case of selection bias going on - they’re only noticing the kind of women who are looking to run around having lots of sex and basing their ideas of all women on them.
 
I have seen enough of the dark side of femininity. I will draw my conclusions accordingly. It has never been a better time to be a playboy. What does marriage 2.0 offer that makes it so much better?
 
To tired from being out the night before – video games-- sports on tv /they just don’t want to. It’s their own free will choice to attend church or not.
 
I have seen enough of the dark side of femininity. I will draw my conclusions accordingly. It has never been a better time to be a playboy. What does marriage 2.0 offer that makes it so much better?

Yea – what a goal for a Catholic man to aspire to.
 
I have seen enough of the dark side of femininity. I will draw my conclusions accordingly. It has never been a better time to be a playboy. What does marriage 2.0 offer that makes it so much better?
You’re not answering the question.

Forget marriage “before and after” feminism. Just take marriage in general. Take a woman who wants a loving marriage to a man who will help raise and care for her children and wants to be chaste and committed to one man. They are out there. What reason does she have to marry one of your “alpha” men?
 
Right, it has absolutely nothing to do with the gynocentric garbage that has been rammed down our throats for decades now. You will of course note that a similar gap does not exist between Muslim men and Muslim women. The religion happens to be far more patriarchal as well. Must be a coincidence.
 
Last edited:
That’s the brain on the “red-pill”. Those that swallow the red-pill – see what the red-pill wants them to see.
 
Here’s a question for you: What would you want in a woman that you would want to marry?
 
To tired from being out the night before – video games-- sports on tv /they just don’t want to. It’s their own free will choice to attend church or not.
And/or the fact many young ‘men’ in the West are too egocentric to accept the fact they can’t do whatever they please. They prefer to take no orders from anyone else but themselves. The whole idea Someone is above them repulses them too.
You will of course note that a similar gap does not exist between Muslim men and Muslim women.
Apparently, that’s because Muslim women aren’t required to go to mosques and only men are obligated to.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top