Nicholas II and his family

  • Thread starter Thread starter Little_Boy_Lost
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

Little_Boy_Lost

Guest
I’ve heard from several orthodox friends of mine, they feel conflicted about the glorification of Nicholas II and his family. I’ve heard the term “Passion Bearer” applied to them as distinct from martyr but I can’t help but feel there is some sketchiness to them that though unfortunate as was their death at the hands of the bolsheviks, I wouldn’t necessarily glorify them as examples of piety and holiness. What are the opinions of my fellow Byzantine Catholics on this one?
 
In the Orthodox Church, a Passion bearer is one who suffered meekly during trials and didn’t try to fight back. Read the lives of the Imperial Family in the years 1917-1918. They are not really classified martyrs, because they were not executed for religious grounds, but for political reasons and such.

John
 
What constitutes a Byzantine Catholic? . .
It could be a Catholic in one of the eastern Catholic churches in the tradition of Byzantium (Constantinople) or it could mean the Byzantine Catholic Church USA.

The Byzantine Tradition includes the Catholic Churches below with the asterisk:

Eastern Catholic Statatistics 2010

4,350,735 Ukrainian * (Union of Brest 1595)
3,828,591 Syro-Malabar #
3,290,539 Maronite %
1,614,604 Melkite * (1724 Syrian-Byzantine)
707,452 Romanian * (Act of Union of 1698, Metr. Atanasie Anghel)
646,243 Ruthenian * (Union of Uzhorod 1646) - Byzantine USA
593,459 Armenian @
490,371 Chaldean #
420,081 Syro-Malankara %
290,000 Hungarian * (Union of Uzhorod 1646)
239,394 Slovak * (Union of Uzhorod 1646)
229,547 Ethiopian/Eritrean $
163,630 Coptic $
158,818 Syrian %
61,487 Italo-Albanian *
43,878 Krizevci (Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo) *
15,037 Macedonia *
10,000 Bulgarian *
3,845 Albanian *
2,525 Greek *​

147,600 No Hierarchy (Argentina, Austria, Brazil, France, Poland)
  • Byzantine (Ukrainian, Melkite, Romanian, Ruthenian, …)

Chaldean (Malabar, Chaldean)​

% Antiochian (Maronite, Malankara, Syrian)
@ Armenian (Armenian)
$ Alexandrian (Coptic, Ethiopian/Eritrean)
 
I’ve heard that many Orthodox consider them to really be martyrs although they were given the title passion-bearers. In fact, I think the Russian horologion that we use in our parish has them listed as martyrs. But honestly I do not know much about them to form an opinion.
 
I have always greatly admired the Tsar and his family; I was horrified ever since childhood to read of how his innocent children were gunned down.

I was very happy when the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia canonized them as Passion Bearers. I have an icon of them, in fact, and they were one of the things that drew me to the Russian Orthodox Church (I didn’t join yet, but have been planning to.)
 
My own view of the Russian Royal Family is that they are truly Christian martyrs/passion-bearers and were VERY holy.

There are icons of them that are miraculous in terms of healings obtained through their intercession and also which weap tears.

The problem is, as with a number of other saints, that they got very bad press from . . . the soviets.

“Tsars” in general got bad press, but there were a number of them who were really very compassionate and holy.

The Russian emperor Paul I (a leader of the Order of Malta who was “addicted” to the Maltese Cross and placed it everywhere, including on top of his imperial crown) died violently and, to this day, young married couples light candles at his tomb.

St Nicholas II was an extremely gentle leader whose only issue was that he really wasn’t trained properly to be a leader (his father, a real ruffian, thought his son was silly and weak for devoting himself to the arts and to cultural pursuits and so left him alone).

Nicholas saw the Russian empire evolving into a federation of autonomous states with religious freedom. He personally communicated with the Old Believers to assure them that he would never persecute them etc.

And when the Catholic martyr, Bl. Leonid Fyodorov wrote to the Tsar to tell him that his EC Old Rite community was praying for his son, he received a hand-written note in reply from the Tsar himself, thanking him and his community. Other Tsars would have undoubtedly sent the secret police out . . .

And when Bl. Leonid was ever bothered by the Tsarist police in future, he simply showed them that same hand-written note from the Tsar, before which the police simply bowed and walked away, leaving them unharmed.

Tsar St Nicholas II was a man of deep personal culture in whom there was none of the barbarism of his predecessors. He was caught up in the troubles of an evil time and was blamed for things he had no or minimal control over. People complain that he was a weak ruler - that doesn’t preclude him from being a saint.

The devotional experience of the Russian people with the martyred Royal family has produced a lot of great spiritual fruit. The American author of the book, “Nicholas and Alexandra” was led to become Orthodox through his research and later his veneration for the Russian Royal/Imperial family. To this day, he keeps an icon of them on his desk.

The icon of all New Martyrs and Confessors of Rus’ has them depicted in the centre.

I believe every Christian, Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant, should have this icon in memory of the thousands slaughtered mercilessly for Christ by the Soviet “servants of satan” as the icon itself indicates.

Alex
 
In fact, the Russian Orthodox Church DID declare them Martyrs and Saints.

I do not understand why, as their deaths had absolutely nothing to do with their religion. It was ordered to prevent them from being a “rallying point” for non-communist" forces that were fighting against the Communist government of Russia.

There was no indication that Nicholas, or any of his children, were particularly religious at all. The Empress was, but once again that had nothing to do with the fact that she was murdered.

But, the Russian Orthodox Church, once their remains were found, declared them martyrs and saints.
 
My own view of the Russian Royal Family is that they are truly Christian martyrs/passion-bearers and were VERY holy.

There are icons of them that are miraculous in terms of healings obtained through their intercession and also which weap tears.

The problem is, as with a number of other saints, that they got very bad press from . . . the soviets.

“Tsars” in general got bad press, but there were a number of them who were really very compassionate and holy.

The Russian emperor Paul I (a leader of the Order of Malta who was “addicted” to the Maltese Cross and placed it everywhere, including on top of his imperial crown) died violently and, to this day, young married couples light candles at his tomb.

St Nicholas II was an extremely gentle leader whose only issue was that he really wasn’t trained properly to be a leader (his father, a real ruffian, thought his son was silly and weak for devoting himself to the arts and to cultural pursuits and so left him alone).

Nicholas saw the Russian empire evolving into a federation of autonomous states with religious freedom. He personally communicated with the Old Believers to assure them that he would never persecute them etc.

And when the Catholic martyr, Bl. Leonid Fyodorov wrote to the Tsar to tell him that his EC Old Rite community was praying for his son, he received a hand-written note in reply from the Tsar himself, thanking him and his community. Other Tsars would have undoubtedly sent the secret police out . . .

And when Bl. Leonid was ever bothered by the Tsarist police in future, he simply showed them that same hand-written note from the Tsar, before which the police simply bowed and walked away, leaving them unharmed.

Tsar St Nicholas II was a man of deep personal culture in whom there was none of the barbarism of his predecessors. He was caught up in the troubles of an evil time and was blamed for things he had no or minimal control over. People complain that he was a weak ruler - that doesn’t preclude him from being a saint.

The devotional experience of the Russian people with the martyred Royal family has produced a lot of great spiritual fruit. The American author of the book, “Nicholas and Alexandra” was led to become Orthodox through his research and later his veneration for the Russian Royal/Imperial family. To this day, he keeps an icon of them on his desk.

The icon of all New Martyrs and Confessors of Rus’ has them depicted in the centre.

I believe every Christian, Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant, should have this icon in memory of the thousands slaughtered mercilessly for Christ by the Soviet “servants of satan” as the icon itself indicates.

Alex
This was such a beautiful, heartfelt post! Thank you so much! I have an icon of the Tsar and his family in my icon corner, and recently bought a second one too.
 
I’ve heard from several orthodox friends of mine, they feel conflicted about the glorification of Nicholas II and his family. I’ve heard the term “Passion Bearer” applied to them as distinct from martyr but I can’t help but feel there is some sketchiness to them that though unfortunate as was their death at the hands of the bolsheviks, I wouldn’t necessarily glorify them as examples of piety and holiness. What are the opinions of my fellow Byzantine Catholics on this one?
My view, as a fellow Byzantine Catholic:

Holy Passion-bearer Nicholas, pray to God for us!
 
Yes, as I understand it, it is because of their behavior from the time they were arrested to the time they were murdered.

Another saint from that era who I greatly admire is Elizabeth, the New Martyr.
 
It wasn’t a well, but a mine shaft and she and her relatives were all thrown in and grenades were tossed in after to complete the job, but there were accounts that there were voices singing afterwards in the shaft.
 
In fact, the Russian Orthodox Church DID declare them Martyrs and Saints.

I do not understand why, as their deaths had absolutely nothing to do with their religion. It was ordered to prevent them from being a “rallying point” for non-communist" forces that were fighting against the Communist government of Russia.

There was no indication that Nicholas, or any of his children, were particularly religious at all. The Empress was, but once again that had nothing to do with the fact that she was murdered.

But, the Russian Orthodox Church, once their remains were found, declared them martyrs and saints.
In fact, their official saintly status is that of “Passion-Bearers” and not Martyrs.

Passion-Bearer is a title not known in the Roman Catholic West and is specific to the Eastern Church.

It refers to a saint’s fatal suffering that was not necessarily related to religion. Saints Boris and Hlib, the sons of St Vladimir the Great, are Passion-Bearers because they were killed by their brother “Svyatopolk the Damned” in his drive to secure the throne for himself. They died, however, without resisting him as they refused to fight him in fear of killing him and therefore being guilty of fraticide. St Hlib was killed by his brother’s men in church as he sang the Psalms.

The relics of St Edward the Martyr are now in Orthodox hands in Surrey in England (their finder wanted to release the relics to that Church that would observe St Edward’s four annual feast-days and since both the Roman Catholic and Anglican churches refused this, he surrendered them to the Orthodox Church that happily agreed to this condition).

The Orthodox gave St Edward his proper title of “Passion-Bearer” since he too was not killed for religious reasons.

In the case of Tsar St Nicholas Romanov, there can be no doubt that he was murdered by the Bolsheviks primarily because he was a Christian monarch. The Russians, especially those in the vast rural areas of Russia, were deeply attached to him and this made the Bolsheviks, and Lenin especially, extremely jealous. (The Russian revolution was an urban phenomenon and was led by the brute military power of the stronger Bolshevik party.)

The Tsar was martyred at a time when the Bolshevik military strength was at its zenith and there was no chance that any sort of counter-revolution could have arisen to oppose the Bolsheviks, least of all the spent White Army of Denikin and the confused stance of the West. The Bolsheviks would have dealt with any such in a most brutal manner and for years afterwards, literally millions of people would die on the charge of “counter-revolution” - a ridiculous charge to begin with!

The Russian Orthodox Church decided to use the title “Passion-Bearers” for the Tsar and his family, also to try and put an end to the anti-semitism among the Russians that stemmed from a popular (but false) belief that the Tsar was killed by “Jewish Bolsheviks.”

At the same time, Tsar Nicholas II was VERY personally pious, together with his entire family. He was completely devoted to the liturgical life of the Orthodox Church, prayed the Jesus Prayer constantly, kept literally dozens upon dozens of icons for his own devotional use, even in his military railway car.

There was a tradition of Tsarist piety in Russia that outstripped that of any other European monarchy. Tsar Alexis, the father of Peter I, was a case in point, and this despite his political chicanery as a leader. Tsar Alexis would not only hear the entire Daily Office of the Orthodox Church and attend Divine Liturgy with Communion, he made 1,000 full prostrations to the floor with the Jesus Prayer daily.

Tsar Nicholas II was born on the feast day of St Job the Much-Suffering and he alway had a great veneration for this Old Testament saint, uniting his personal suffering to this model of bearing of unjust wrongs.

Tsar St Nicholas loved going on religious pilgrimages and he took the unusual step of asking to help carry the coffin of St Seraphim of Sarov when this great Russian saint was canonized (at the Tsar’s persisten urging) in 1903.

St Seraphim of Sarov, who lived in the 18th century, gave a hand-written letter to his friends and told them to make sure that it be put in the hands of the “Fourth Emperor of Russia to visit Sarov.”

That happened to be . . . Tsar Nicholas II. When the Tsar read the letter, it is said that he turned white as St Seraphim prophesied in it that he would suffer death for Orthodox Russia at the hands of godless men but that Holy Russia would arise again.

Many miracles are reported through the icons of Tsar St Nicholas and there are even weeeping icons of him. He is extremely popular throughout Russia and posters of him are sold and even given away free at subway stops!

Alex
 
What constitutes a Byzantine Catholic? . .
Dear Wesley,

I see that you list your religion as “KaFolyk” which is the Orthodox rendering of “Catholic” meaning that you are Orthodox (at least that is what “Kafolyk” means).

A Byzantine Catholic is another name for an Orthodox Christian who is in union with Rome, whose spirituality and spiritual identity is Orthodox/Byzantine, but who acknowledges the primacy of the Pope of Rome.

Since you asked . . .

Alex
 
It wasn’t a well, but a mine shaft and she and her relatives were all thrown in and grenades were tossed in after to complete the job, but there were accounts that there were voices singing afterwards in the shaft.
You’re right, I apologize…for some reason I keep saying “well”! :o
 
The worrisome part of the glorification of Sts. Nicholas and Alexandra, Passion Bearers, is the rather strong evidence that the Tsarina was a heretic under the sway of Father Monk Grigori Rasputin. Who also was killed…

And it’s not like Alexandra’s scandalous relationship with Rasputin wasn’t known - it was in fact a common complaint of her day about her in noble circles. As was Rasputin’s heteropraxy. It serves a Russian internal political need, but associating Tsarina Alexandra with Orthodoxy does not do the Russian Orthodox Church much PR good outside Russia.

And then there’s the issue that Nicholas had overturned Orthodoxy’s monopoly…
 
If it’s OK with the ROC and the Orthodox people of Russia who venerate them so highly - it’s OK with me! 😉

Rasputin was truly a curious case. A scoundrel in all, he made his way into the circle of the Russian imperial family by apparently being able to stop the bleeding of the Tsarevich as a result of his disease.

In fact, village medicine is what stopped his bleeding. Village doctors knew that the blood would coagulate if people suffering from such would keep calm. Whenever St Alexis would begin to bleed, physicians would rush frantically about him, trying to do something but not being able to do anything. This worsened his condition. Rasputin simply walked in and told the physicians to leave the room immediately. He would then put his hand on the Tsarevich to reassure him all will be well and then walked out. The Tsarevich calmed down subsequently and the bleeding stopped.

So there was no way the Tsaritsa would not show her gratitude to Rasputin as it truly did seem that he was a miracle-worker (and the Russian imperial Crown passed down only to male heirs etc).

Russian aristocratic circles hated the fact that such a village commoner held such influence with the Tsaritsa - they had no idea why and certainly gossip would have abounded, only to be made worse by Bolshevik propaganda later.

That Tsaritsa St Alexandra was personally very pious and long-suffering with her son - of this there cannot be any doubt.

In addition, the region from which Grigory Rasputin originated is now promoting his . . . canonization - saying he was unjustly villified - and has published icons of him together with a Service and an akathist. This has been categorically rejected by the Russian Synod (as has the possibility of the canonization of Tsar Ivan the Terrible - but an akathist to him is on the website “akafist.narod.ru” for “private veneration”).

Tsaritsa Alexandra Romanov was in a very bad situation with her son and she acted as any mother would have. No crime or sin in that.

And Tsar St Nicholas Romanov began to not only think like a democrat but also to act like one as well. In 1905, he ordered the Moscow Academy of Sciences to issue a statement to the fact that the Ukrainian language was distinct from Russian and that “anyone who said differently was acting out of questionable motives.”

He respected not only the Old Believers and other groups, but also Eastern Catholics, (e.g. Bl. Leonid Fyodorov) although low-ranking Tsarist forces didn’t always comply with the spirit of their Tsar, to be sure.

Alex
 
Alex, I hope you are correct in your assessment of the Tsarina; the historical evidence is far darker, ignoring for the moment the Soviet spin put upon it later.

Rasputin was a heretic. His teachings included the value of libidinousness, fornication and gluttony. The general consensus is that he was either possessed or a demonic being incarnate. Especially after being tossed into the river for dead, UNDER the ice, and showing up a few days later.

And hemophilia does not work such that simple calm would stop the bleeding. The disease is a defective clotting factor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top