NIHIL OBSTAT and the IMPRIMATUR

  • Thread starter Thread starter cindy_th
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

cindy_th

Guest
Hello…
I’m not sure if this is the right place for this question…

I’m very confused about a few things…and this might lead into a few questions…
but let me start off by asking …

What does the NIHIL OBSTAT and the IMPRIMATUR
mean?

If something we read is granted these…can we assume they are “safe” for us to read??

thank you for your time
God Bless
 
The “Nihil Obstat” and “Imprimatur” are official declarations that a book or pamphlet is free of doctrinal or moral error. No implication is contained therein that those who have granted the Nihil Obstat and the Imprimatur agree with the content, opinions or statements expressed.

In short, yes they are safe to read 🙂
 
thank you…
but where did you get that info?
I guess what I really need to know is…
is that definition written somewhere “Catholic”
Is it in the Cannon Law…the Catechism?
(I found the same def. under Wikipedia)
but I need it somewhere…oh I don’t know…
I’m not sure how to say what I want to say…
:confused:

(wheres the little loopy smily?? ) 🙂
 
Is it in the Cannon Law…the Catechism?
Canon Law.
Can. 823 §1. In order to preserve the integrity of the truths of faith and morals, the pastors of the Church have the duty and right to be watchful so that no harm is done to the faith or morals of the Christian faithful through writings or the use of instruments of social communication. They also have the duty and right to demand that writings to be published by the Christian faithful which touch upon faith or morals be submitted to their judgment and have the duty and right to condemn writings which harm correct faith or good morals.
The entire* INSTRUMENTS OF SOCIAL COMMUNICATION AND BOOKS IN PARTICULAR* (Cann. 822 - 832) can be found on the Vatican’s website:

vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P2Q.HTM

Note that Canon Law doesn’t use the terms* “Nihil Obstat” *or *“Imprimatur” *(Canon Law describes these approvals as “annotations”).
 
Nihil obstat means either “nothing objectionable” or “nothing [objectionable] observed”; I don’t remember which.

Imprimatur means “Let it be printed.”
 
You may also encounter an IMPRIMI POTEST.
Only if the author was a member of a Religious Order. In this case, the author would need permission (Imprimi Potest) of his/her religious superior to publish the work.
 
Only if the author was a member of a Religious Order. In this case, the author would need permission (Imprimi Potest) of his/her religious superior to publish the work.
I mention it because that is what is on the copyright page of the Catechism, and not an imprimatur or a nihil obstat. So I thought the OP might also find that phrase of interest. It means “it may be printed”.
 
Hello…
I’m not sure if this is the right place for this question…

I’m very confused about a few things…and this might lead into a few questions…
but let me start off by asking …

What does the NIHIL OBSTAT and the IMPRIMATUR
mean?

If something we read is granted these…can we assume they are “safe” for us to read??

thank you for your time
God Bless
The “Nihil Obstat” and “Imprimatur” are declarations by an individual Bishop, Abbot, etc. that a book or pamphlet is free of doctrinal or moral error in his opinion. It is possible that the material is found defective later and the “Imprimatur” is removed unless the defect is corrected.
 
can someone give an official pronunciation of NIHIL OBSTAT and IMPRIMATUR so i no longer fumble and sound unsure of myself whenever i try to pronounce them?
 
Nihil Obstat: nee-hill awb-stot

Imprimatur: im-pree-mah-toor.

Hope that helps.
 
If the book or any published matl is in English, why not use the English translation of Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur so that everyone understands. This is the same observation (complaint) I have regarding the use of other languages (Latin I think) for some prayers and songs in an English mass which I totally don’t understand.
 
If the book or any published matl is in English, why not use the English translation of Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur so that everyone understands. This is the same observation (complaint) I have regarding the use of other languages (Latin I think) for some prayers and songs in an English mass which I totally don’t understand.
In regards to using it in the books, I think whether it was in English or not, you’d still have to know what it means to understand why it’s there. Also, putting “It may be printed” or whatever other translation down is a bit more vague. What I mean is, someone could glance at that and not think anything of it. But to see “Imprimatur”, one who knows the significance immediately understands. Also, with Latin being the Church’s official language, Imprimatur is used in all countries. So, if one happens to be browsing through religious books in a different language and catches the imprimatur, they can easily decide to either translate it or find a translated version of it.

Now, the use of Latin or Greek (Kyrie) in English Masses is mostly just due to the preference of the priest, congregation, and/or music director. Generally the congregation knows what part of the Mass is happening when the Latin form is sung, so generally it’s not very difficult to understand what you’re saying. I think part of it has to do with nostalgia, a way to reconnect with the Church of the past. It’s also generally really pretty.
 
If the book or any published matl is in English, why not use the English translation of Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur so that everyone understands.
I think 70 or so years ago, everybody did understand, because they knew the words, often knew Latin, and had been taught to look for them. Now, people often aren’t taught about them, but then, usually in a newer book I find printed underneath the Latin words an explanation of the words. In fact what is usually printed is the exact explanation given by the first person to respond to OP. I have several books lying around with that printed in the front. But I also have newer things without it printed underneath, so it is not universally printed.

Myself, I’d prefer to always have the same thing printed in any book, in any language. Then I’d always know what I am dealing with, even if I happened to be poor in the particular language of that book. At least I would reliably recognize and read the Latin words. If it were printed in, say, Chinese, I’d not recognize the words at all.
 
I love the NIHIL OBSTAT and the IMPRIMATUR – it helps me know what is Church doctrine and If I don’t see the NIHIL OBSTAT and the IMPRIMATUR then I know to be careful what I’m reading.

ONLY our wonderful God through our Church would help protect us with knowing what is safe to read – what is free from error.

Praise God from whom all blessing flow – and the NIHIL OBSTAT and the IMPRIMATUR are definitely a blessing!👍
 
nihil obstat means nothing stands in the way, or nothing prevents (i.e. publication)

imprimatur means let it be printed

Unfortunately, many books with assertions contrary to Catholic teaching on faith and morals nevertheless receive the imprimatur.
 
During the Renaissance when printing was a relatively new technology and had potentially revolutionary implications about access to and flow of ideas, most European states had some form of prior censorship in place. Although there were clandestine printers and publications (for example, Catholics in England did publish propaganda of various kinds that was not officially approved by the English government), most printers had to have things they printed approved first by some governmental body. The Roman Church, which has since the late Roman period tended to operate like a state. had its censorship apparatus. People subject to Roman Catholic authorities, if they wished to publish, had to submit what they intended to publish to Church aurthorities. Some delegate of the authority, a censor librorum would read the thing, and if he found nothing objectionable, would send it up to the higher authority with a declaration, Nihil obstat. Nothing stands in the way. The hgher authority might then review it and issue an Imprimatur, Let it be printed.

Nowadays, this is not very much operative, although regular and secular clergy, who are, at least in theory, more closely controlled, may have to submit to some such process.

But the era of the Renaissance is over. We live in an era where ideas circulate more freely. Catholics too are able to participate in the commerce of ideas in a full and expansive way. Some clerical types, especially some of those running about in the corridors of the Vatican, would like to push back the clock. But they are fighting a losing battle. Freedom of thought is here to stay, for Catholics too.!
 
I’m trying to organize our collection of books at the church into a library for the parish. We decided to limit the scope to religious topics and some Catholic fiction, poetry, and childrens’ liturature. I thought it would be a simple task. Was I ever wrong.

Nuts of every variety came bouncing out of trees. “Progressives” offered works by theologians who have been censured by the Vatican. Cranks insisted we include ramblings from questionable visionaries. I thought that all I had to do was see that every book had an Imprimatur or Nihil Obstat.

To my dismay, I found that many worthwhile Catholic books don’t have either. Seems that they are no longer necessary. The Faith Formation Office at our archdiocese was no help. They have no desire to get in the book selection business; neither does our pastor. I know from experience that a parish committee will fight a lot and never get anything done.

What should I do?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top