No catholic anymore

  • Thread starter Thread starter ADiosgracias
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
JL: I was such a Protestant. I used to call myself a non-denominational Bible Christian. After a long time of private Bible studies and Catholic teaching, on my own, outside the Catholic Church or anyone knowing, Protestant or Catholic. I found the ancient christian community as it is discribed in the Holy Bilbe. the following links are my Scriptural reasons for coming to that ancient christian community, the ONE HOLY CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH. The Church Christ is building from living stones with Peter as the VISIBLE ROCK of faith unity.

I posted the links as it is very long, because of all the scriptural evidence for the Catholic Church, and I don’t want to interupte the line. Maybe you could post scriptures for the Baptist Church or non-denominations. As a former non-denominational member I can tell you in dogma there is a great difference. We tried to convert Baptist and they tried to convert us. One BIG difference is OSAS my non-denomination didn’t believe in OSAS, it is totally unscrptural.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=7447593&postcount=987 forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=7447600&postcount=988 forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=7447604&postcount=989 forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=7447619&postcount=990
Hi thanks for your answer.
Honestly, brother, I know practically nothing about non-denominational Churches. But having watched the God Channel (where there are often non-denominational preachers), I’ve thought that they are quite similar in belief than the Baptists. (?)
In Austria there is only one non-denominational Church (speaking of my county the Tyrol): Vineyard (They are charismatics.)
I have always thought so far that they are not really different from the Assemblies of God (the biggest Pentecostal Church here in Austria; 'though they have a different name here!). - But if they are non-denominational, they must be, according to your post. (and according to wikipedia)

No, the term non-denominational was my private term. I labelled myself non-denominational Christian. At that time I had no idea that non-denominationalism is a groups of Churches.

In which Church of the ones written in the wikipedia Article were you? Just curious.
 
Well Merger, we can add any number of adjectives but for the Catholic Church to claim, define one as a Catholic, to be baptized in the Church is indeed all that is necessary for the noun. 👍
Hi, friend. (Would you mind calling me PR? I prefer. Thanks! It’s faster to type that anyway ;))

Anyway, yes, the only thing required for the noun is to be baptized. But we’re talking about descriptors/adjectives here.

Sort of like giving someone a first name:* We all know he’s a Sanchez. But which one is he? Oh, he’s **Christopher **Sanchez. *
 
Yet Guan, you can not judge who shall be united with heaven. I know with 100% certainty someone once said, “It is not within our purview to judge the hearts of others.” 👍
Of course we are to judge, Matt. The Scriptures command us to! (See John 7:24).

We simply cannot judge the hearts of others nor determine their eternal destination.

[BIBLEDRB]John 7:24[/BIBLEDRB]
 
What is the correct way to call people who took the initiation sacraments and never again go to church or pray. They use to call themselves catholic but I think is a bad example and they don’t represent us.
Best response I’ve seen is from another thread:

I would actually agree if one person was to approach another, stick a finger in his/her chest, and say “You are a Cafeteria Catholic.”

Having said that, though, to deny that there is not a condition of “cafeteria Catholicism” is simply a denial of reality.

I suppose that a different word/phrase could be coined to describe the condition. But the subsequent word/phrase would then be attacked as being “insensitive” or “uncharitable.”

In the majority of cases, those who are personally offended by this are those who will not confront the fact that they intentionally, obstinately, and publicly reject many of the Church’s teachings.
 
Catholic by birth. Was more or less a faithful Catholic until I became 16. 😉
Was very poorly catechised (as I learned quite quickly here in CAF).
Having been Involved in the Baptist Church ('though no full member yet) since summer 2009. 😉
There is no such thing as “Catholic by birth”. 😃

At some point your parents or guardians approached the Church in faith, asking for baptism, then made a profession of faith on your behalf, so that you could be born again into new life, and made a member of the Body of Christ. I think the term you may be seeking is “cradle Catholic”?

Since the Apostles taught that there was only one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, the “again baptizers” (Anabaptists, and their descendents the Baptists" depart from the Apostolic faith when they rebaptize those who have already been baptized. This is one of the reasons they were excommunicated.

I read in one of your posts yesterday that you believed they were an ancient faith. This is not the case. They were formed about 500 years ago by people seeking, just as you have been, an authentic Christianity they did not find in Catholicism.

In addition to rebaptizing the faithful, they also have a number of other significant departues from the Aposotlic faith, which have been replaced by innovations of their own.
 
Of course we are to judge, Matt. The Scriptures command us to! (See John 7:24).

We simply cannot judge the hearts of others nor determine their eternal destination.
Yes, I would agree. Too often we are called not to judge at all by some but that is not the case. According to Catholic doctrine, the destiny of each soul is decided by the judgment of God and not us humans. However, we are called upon not to accept sinful behaviour. When it come to light a person has publically demonstrated moral faults, there no injustice is done in admonishing it within a proportionate reason. Nonetheless, we must be alway careful in not damaging a person’s reputation by slander, detraction or calumny**.**
 
Yes, I would agree. Too often we are called not to judge at all by some but that is not the case
Indeed.

And the delicious irony in all of this is that those who condemn us for judging are, well, judging, no?

(Perhaps “delicious” is not the best word here. Bemusing, perhaps, is a better choice? Amusing? Illogical? Hypocritical? IDK.)
 
Code:
Yet Guan, you can not judge who shall be united with heaven.  I know with 100% certainty someone once said, "It is not within our purview to judge the hearts of others."  :thumbsup:
Indeed not, since anyone, like the thief, may repent at the last minute,and throw themselves upon the mercy of God.

But we can most certainly discern what types of behaviors Jesus and the Apostles have taught us will result in the loss of our heavenly inheritance. We must do this for ourselves, and for those around us, as we are to be witnesses to the Truth. If we stand by and say nothing, when we see others acting in a manner that we know, with 100% certainty, will not result in the inheritance of the Kingdom, then we are participating in their sins, and therefore, are also guilty of sin.

Gal 5:19-22
19 Now the works of the flesh are plain: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, 20 idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, party spirit, 21 envy, drunkenness, carousing, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, **that those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. **

You have said in your posts that we can’t know the doctrine of Christ with 100% certainty, but Catholics believe differently. We believe that the Word of God, both in Scripture, and in Sacred Tradition, is a 100% reliable revelation by God of Himself, and His will for mankind. We can be confident that the Source is pure and reliable, because it comes from God.

By that confidence, when we read such passages as this one, we can apply it to our eternal benefit. By such guidance, we can avoid mortal sin ourselves, and appropriately warn others who engage in such behaviors.
Code:
This is why I believe it can be a disservice for Catholics to push other Catholics further away.
There are many reasons we should not be inhospitable with others in addition to our inability to see into their hearts. Jesus said to treat people who call themselves believers, but don’t act accordingly like “tax collectors and sinners”. We know He meant by this that they are fertile field for evangelization and conversion. Pushing people away does not help anyone to convert.
OP for instance says calling them Catholic is a bad example because they don’t represent the Church. I have even seen elsewhere people saying to let them go and the Church would be better off to be more orthodox, if smaller.
Yes, it is wrong to encourage anyone who is living in mortal sin to present themselves for Eucharist. They eat and drink condemnation upon themselves. It is also wrong to present oneself for communion if one is not in “communion” with the successor of Peter, and the One Faith which is under his guidance and protection. It is like committing a lie with one’s body, behaving as if one is in communion, yet profession lack of it by one’s denial of the doctrines of the faith.

If those in rebellion against the Teachings of the faith, though, could attend Mass with integrity, then it would certainly benefit them to do so, because they would be present for the graces of the Sacrament, prayers, and preaching (if any). Unfortunately, there are many more that line up for Eucharist without such integrity, which again, brings damage to the whole body of Christ.
The problem that persists is those objected to, might then come to feel so unwelcomed in their current state that they simply lose any desire at all to remain even to the degree they have been.
Indeed. Judas is one who fell into this sin of despair. He knew he had done wrong, but rather than throw himself on the mercy of God, his pride prevented him.

If a person is going to be lukewarm, it is better that they make a decision, one way, or ther other.

Rev 3:16-17
6 So, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew you out of my mouth.

Who wants to be the Lord’s spew?

It is not a matter of people being “objected to”, but their behavior. It is not the people here in Revelation that Jesus criticizes, but their behavior.
Code:
And in that case hope might be forever lost for bringing them into a fuller practice of the faith.
I personally cannot subscribe to such an attitude of pessimism and despair. I think there is no moment that is too late to repent of sin, and come into the obedience of faith.

Failing to tell a person the truth about the evil of relativism (cafeteria catholicism) is unloving, and will not lead them into the fullness of the faith.

Had I been so challenged as a youngster, I may not have found it necessary to leave the Church. was looking for authentic christainity, and was surrounded by those who professed they believed, but did not act accordingly.
If the concern is they misrepresent the Church to others, surely the correct representation can be given to others by those with such a concern.
Yes, it is a grave responsibility to call oneself Catholic as it states to others that one espouses the doctrines of the faith. All are in a position to be held accountable for that profession. Intolerance for indifference and relativism is part of that correct representation. 👍
 
Catholic by birth. Was more or less a faithful Catholic until I became 16. 😉
Was very poorly catechised (as I learned quite quickly here in CAF).
Having been Involved in the Baptist Church ('though no full member yet) since summer 2009. 😉
Sounds like your spiritual journey is still continuing. Yes its very informative here. Prayer is the key that will place you where you are suppose to be.

God Bless, Gary
 
Hi thanks for your answer.
Honestly, brother, I know practically nothing about non-denominational Churches. But having watched the God Channel (where there are often non-denominational preachers), I’ve thought that they are quite similar in belief than the Baptists. (?)
In Austria there is only one non-denominational Church (speaking of my county the Tyrol): Vineyard (They are charismatics.) I have always thought so far that they are not really different from the Assemblies of God (the biggest Pentecostal Church here in Austria; 'though they have a different name here!). - But if they are non-denominational, they must be, according to your post. (and according to wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_denominational#Examples
No, the term non-denominational was my private term. I labelled myself non-denominational Christian. At that time I had no idea that non-denominationalism is a groups of Churches. In which Church of the ones written in the wikipedia Article were you? Just curious.
JL: I did not belong to any of those listed at wikipedia. My non-denomination was called Plesant Grove Church of God. It was not associated with any other congregation. It was one individual congregation only. Those listed on wikipedia I would call non-denomination denominations as they are in union with other congregations known by the same name. There are about 25 different Baptist denominations in the U.S. From snake handlers to Free Will Baptist who do not hold OSAS.

You said in you previous post, “I believe to have found (after a long time of private Bible studies) in the Baptist Church: a “bible believing, ancient christian community as it is discribed in the Holy Bible.”

I notice you didn’t present any scriptural evidence for your view of this ancient christian community. I have seen no such evidence in scripture, except for ONE VISIBLE FELLOWSHIP. [Eph4:4 There is **one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; 5 One Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.

We see what people did the first time the gospel was preached by Peter? Acts2:41 Then THEY THAT gladly RECEIVED HIS WORD were BAPTIZED: and the same day there WERE ADDED UNTO THEM about three thousand souls. 42 And THEY CONTINUED steadfastly IN the APOSTLES’ DOCTRINE and FELLOWSHIP, and in BREAKING OF BREAD (mass), and in PRAYERS.

Those that received his word were ADDED to the ONE SENT APOSTLIC FELLOWSHIP, (one body) the Church (guided by one Spirit), thru baptism (one baptism) and CONTINUED steadfastly in the APOSTLES DOCTRINE, (one faith, teaching) that they may ALL be One VISIBLE Holy Catholic Apostolic Fellowship, as Christ (our one hope and one Lord) prayed in the garden. [Jn17:21 **THAT THEY ALL MAY BE ONE; as thou, Father (one God and Father), art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: THAT THE WORLD MAY BELIEVE that thou hast sent me.]
 
What is the correct way to call people who took the initiation sacraments and never again go to church or pray. They use to call themselves catholic but I think is a bad example and they don’t represent us.
I was always taught fallen Catholic’s.
 
JL: I did not belong to any of those listed at wikipedia. My non-denomination was called Plesant Grove Church of God. It was not associated with any other congregation. It was one individual congregation only. Those listed on wikipedia I would call non-denomination denominations as they are in union with other congregations known by the same name. There are about 25 different Baptist denominations in the U.S. From snake handlers to Free Will Baptist who do not hold OSAS.
Yes, I know that there dozens of different Baptist Churches in the US. But here in Austria there’s only one. 🙂 And I’ve found out for myself that I am right here.

Was it this Church: pleasantgrovechurch.com/? They write that they are affiliated with the Assemblies of God which is a Pentecostal Church, if I renounce correctly?
Or this one: facebook.com/pages/Pleasant-Grove-Church-of-God/128258306457? Why don’t they have a homepage? 😉

That’s actually an interesting question whether my Church believes in OSAS or not. I’ll ask my pastor! 😉
But from the Bible for me it is clear that we can lose our salvation:
Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. (John 15:4)
So, if we reject Jesus, we’ll use our salvation. Traditionally in the US Baptists do believe in OSAS. correct?
 
=ADiosgracias;7968689]What is the correct way to call people who took the initiation sacraments and never again go to church or pray. They use to call themselves catholic but I think is a bad example and they don’t represent us.
By ALONE judging their actions: SELF CONDEMENED TO HELL! :eek:

Eph. 4: 4-7
[4] There is one body [ONLY One Church] and one Spirit [ONLY One God], just as you were called to the one hope [That comes THROUGH CHRIST and His Catholic Church] that belongs to your call,
[5] one Lord, one faith,[SET OF BELIEFS] one baptism,
[6] one God and Father of us all, who is above all and through all and in all. [And clearly and indispuitably FOUNDED ONLY One Faith, One Church known to be todays Catholic Church and Beliefs]
[7] But grace was given to each of us according to the measure of Christ’s gift. [NOT everyone is able or will accept this truth!]

Heb.6: 2 to 10

[2] with instruction about ablutions, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. [3] And this we will do if God permits.
[4] For it is impossible to restore again to repentance those who have once been enlightened,Baptized into the CC] who have tasted the heavenly gift,Jesus Himself in Catholic Holy COMMUNION] and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, Have been Confirmed in the CC having made a PERSONAL COVENANT WITH GOD] [5] and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, [Have been TAUGHT THE SINGULAR TRUTHS][6] *if they then commit apostasy, since they crucify the Son of God on their own account and hold him up to contempt. [7] For land which has drunk the rain that often falls upon it, and brings forth vegetation useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God. [8] But if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed; its end is to be burned. *[9] Though we speak thus, yet in your case, beloved, we feel sure of better things that belong to salvation. [10] For God is not so unjust as to overlook your work and the love which you showed for his sake in serving the saints, as you still do."

That friends is God’s Position and therefore the position of God’s Church.🤷

Let us pray for them
 
There is no such thing as “Catholic by birth”. 😃

At some point your parents or guardians approached the Church in faith, asking for baptism, then made a profession of faith on your behalf, so that you could be born again into new life, and made a member of the Body of Christ. I think the term you may be seeking is “cradle Catholic”?

Since the Apostles taught that there was only one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, the “again baptizers” (Anabaptists, and their descendents the Baptists" depart from the Apostolic faith when they rebaptize those who have already been baptized. This is one of the reasons they were excommunicated.

I read in one of your posts yesterday that you believed they were an ancient faith. This is not the case. They were formed about 500 years ago by people seeking, just as you have been, an authentic Christianity they did not find in Catholicism.

In addition to rebaptizing the faithful, they also have a number of other significant departues from the Aposotlic faith, which have been replaced by innovations of their own.
Uh hold on there my friend. How about the Blessed Mother!😉
 
Yes, I know that there dozens of different Baptist Churches in the US. But here in Austria there’s only one. 🙂 And I’ve found out for myself that I am right here.

Was it this Church: pleasantgrovechurch.com/? They write that they are affiliated with the Assemblies of God which is a Pentecostal Church, if I renounce correctly?
Or this one: facebook.com/pages/Pleasant-Grove-Church-of-God/128258306457? Why don’t they have a homepage? 😉

That’s actually an interesting question whether my Church believes in OSAS or not. I’ll ask my pastor! 😉
But from the Bible for me it is clear that we can lose our salvation:

So, if we reject Jesus, we’ll use our salvation. Traditionally in the US Baptists do believe in OSAS. correct?
Esdra honestly heart to heart does it bother you that you miss the sacraments?
 
Yes, I know that there dozens of different Baptist Churches in the US. But here in Austria there’s only one. 🙂 And I’ve found out for myself that I am right here.
Was it this Church: pleasantgrovechurch.com/? They write that they are affiliated with the Assemblies of God which is a Pentecostal Church, if I renounce correctly?
Or this one: facebook.com/pages/Pleasant-Grove-Church-of-God/128258306457? Why don’t they have a homepage? 😉
JL: No, the Protestant church which I once belonged did not speak in tongues and did not like Pentecostal’s. Especially those that taught you must speak in tongues to be saved. In the U.S. there are thousands of one congregation churches. They are local and small congregations. I would guess they don’t have a home page as there would be no interest.
That’s actually an interesting question whether my Church believes in OSAS or not. I’ll ask my pastor! 😉
But from the Bible for me it is clear that we can lose our salvation:
JL: True we can lose our salvation. OSAS is nothing more than a tradition of men made a doctrine of God.
So, if we reject Jesus, we’ll use our salvation. Traditionally in the US Baptists do believe in OSAS. correct?
JL: Yes we will lose our salvation. Years ago, when I was Protestant, Baptist were the only group I knew that believed in OSAS. Now many of the newly founded Evangelical type churches teach OSAS, such as Calvary Chapel.

Again I notice you have shown no scripture evidence for your view of an ancient non-denominational church. I would say that is another of those traditions of men made a doctrine of God. The scriptures are very clear Christ is building ONE CHURCH. He didn’t say to Peter, I will build my Churches, He said CHURCH, Mt16. He has ONE BRIDE not a harem of thousands of contentious brides. He has ONE BODY. A body that does not work as ONE unit is not a healthy body.

How could the Church be the pillar and ground of truth as 1Tm3:15 tells us? If it is invisible and scattered among thousands of contentious denominations believing contradicting doctrine? If the Church is scattered among thousands of contentious denominations believing contradicting doctrine? It would be every man for himself and those he can convince of his own personal religion and opinion in interpretation of Scripture? If the Church is scattered among thousands of contentious denominations believing contradicting doctrine and one cannot know or find that Church or name any leaders in history, how can that be the one body of Christ? That is more like one who has amnesia not knowing were he comes from, forgetting his family, having no roots. Sounds like a defective body with a bad nervous system throwing the body into convulsions pulling in every direction. One does not hide a light under a basket, so people can’t see it, but puts it in a high place so that it may give light to all and all can see. So Christ has done in his one visible body and bride the two have become ONE FLESH…
 
Hi, friend. (Would you mind calling me PR? I prefer. Thanks! It’s faster to type that anyway ;))

Anyway, yes, the only thing required for the noun is to be baptized. But we’re talking about descriptors/adjectives here.
No problem PR. I just gathered, perhaps mistakenly, from your signature that R is the mother of Merg e. 🙂

Yes except I know of some Catholics who at minimum frown upon another Catholic identifying with the noun even with an adjective. Oh well. Peace.
 
I personally cannot subscribe to such an attitude of pessimism and despair. I think there is no moment that is too late to repent of sin, and come into the obedience of faith.
Hense why I said to you Guan, “And in that case hope **might be **forever lost for bringing them into a fuller practice of the faith.”

Peace
 
And the delicious irony in all of this is that those who condemn us for judging are, well, judging, no?

(Perhaps “delicious” is not the best word here. Bemusing, perhaps, is a better choice? Amusing? Illogical? Hypocritical? IDK.)
No PR, at least not if you’re referring to me. 🤷 Because in my case I know it should be neither delicious, nor bemusing, amusing, illogical, nor hypocritical as I never say words such as “will not result in unification with one’s heavenly inheritance”.

Peace.
 
No PR, at least not if you’re referring to me. 🤷 Because in my case I know it should be neither delicious, nor bemusing, amusing, illogical, nor hypocritical as I never say words such as “will not result in unification with one’s heavenly inheritance”.

Peace.
Now might be a good time to consider taking on the adult responsibility of the faith you claim to espouse, CM.

Eph 4:14-15
. 15 Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ

Speaking the truth in love is one of the ways we grow mature in the faith.

Here is a Truth:

1 Peter 1:3-6

3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! By his great mercy we have been born anew to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4 and to an inheritance which is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, 5 who by God’s power are guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time. 1 Cor 6:9-10

When we are guarded by God’s power through faith, we will be united to that heavenly inheritance. 👍

Some activities separate us from the power that guards our souls:

9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor sexual perverts, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God.

It is not charitable to pull back from warning people. Do you not want everyone to be united with their heavenly inheritance? Why would you never say such words of warning?

Perhaps you don’t believe “with 100% certainty” that these words of the Scripture are True?

Rev 3:16
16 So, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew you out of my mouth.

Oh ignominious fate!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top