No go Countries as a Catholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter goyim
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

goyim

Guest
What countries should Catholics probably avoid traveling to for long periods of time, because of an inability to fulfil our Sunday Obligation. Obviously, I know of countries like Saudi Arabia, North Korea and most parts of Mainland China to mention such a few.

But perhaps people have experiences traveling to certain countries and finding it extremely difficult to find a Catholic Church. (I like to travel, but it would be nice to know a bit more)
 
The Church doesn’t require you to avoid any countries.
I’ m aware of this. But fulfilling my Sunday Obligation is required. If that is not possible, then I will not be so stupid to travel to Antactica on a 4 month expedition for mere pleasure for example. Unless of course I could have a priest with me. Its a prudential question. And Prudence tells me to avoid certain countries where my obligation and current politics may come in to conflict.
 
Last edited:
I’ m aware of this. But fulfilling my Sunday Obligation is required. If that is not possible, then I will not be so stupid to travel to Antactica on a 4 month expedition for mere pleasure for example.
Or you could ask for a dispensation in advance. Not a huge deal.
 
Or you could ask for a dispensation in advance. Not a huge deal.
Dispensations are for exceptional circumstances. “Wanting to have fun on holiday” is not a prudent reason to ask for such a dispensation. There’s no neccesity for me to travel. Therefore a dispensation shouldnt be given and I wont ask for one.
 
But fulfilling my Sunday Obligation is required
Not when there is no mass to attend. The obligation is a positive law.

We are not expected to do what isn’t possible.
If that is not possible, then I will not be so stupid to travel to Antactica on a 4 month expedition for mere pleasure for example
There is no requirement of the Church that you avoid a trip to Antarctica. It is not “stupid” to go on a trip, even if there is no mass. As I just explained, we are not required to do the impossible. There is no obligation if there is no mass available.
And Prudence tells me to avoid certain countries where my obligation and current politics may come in to conflict.
That’s your choice. But don’t impose it on others because the church does not.
 
Dispensations are for exceptional circumstances. “Wanting to have fun on holiday” is not a prudent reason to ask for such a dispensation.
That’s your opinion, and again don’t try to impose it on others as this simply is NOT Church teaching.
 
Dispensations are for exceptional circumstances. “Wanting to have fun on holiday” is not a prudent reason to ask for such a dispensation. There’s no neccesity for me to travel. Therefore a dispensation shouldnt be given and I wont ask for one.
Ok, that’s fine. That determination is really for the traveler’s pastor to make, but you seem set on this, so you do you.
 
You don’t actually need a dispensation beforehand.
I’m not much of an authority on this, but forgive me for thinking that something that is a Mortal Sin in some cases, can be negated so easily. With an earnest heart, I dont see how such a thing goes over so easy.
 
Yes, this is my choice, which is why I ask the question of where I might best avoid.
That is not what you asked. You asked about countries that CATHOLICS should avoid. The answer is: none.

You didn’t say, “I’ve decided I don’t want to ever travel to places where I cannot go to mass so what are places I should avoid?”
 
Last edited:
You asked about countries that CATHOLICS should avoid
I asked this in this way because, (Unless for some extraordinary circumstances) Fulfilling your Sunday Obligation is a grave obligation. So yes it might not be so ‘stupid’ to travel. And you are not expected to do the impossible. But it seems so glaringly obvious that travelling isnt a neccesity and it’s completely within the faculties of the individual to just not put themselves in such a situation, to do the opposite, seems so very imprudent.

Forgive me if I’m not understanding you correctly. Perhaps I’m at fault here.
 
Last edited:
I think it’s true that most serious Catholics would not wish to travel for too long and not be able to go to a Sunday mass, but it a personal decision for them to make.

Maybe the topic should just be what countries exist that one can’t really get to mass on Sundays? That seems like a better question if I understand that to be the information you are looking for.
 
Perhaps so, think I also shoud give time to reading Dies Domini again, by Pope Saint John Paul 2nd aswell.
 
But it seems so glaringly obvious that travelling isnt a neccesity and it’s completely within the faculties of the individual to just not put themselves in such a situation, to do the opposite, seems so very imprudent.
The Church doesn’t ask this of us. The obligation is what is called a human positive law, and it does admit exceptions, travel among them.

We aren’t required to avoid traveling. Even for pleasure.

I would encourage you to talk to your pastor about your concerns.

Or perhaps later today or tomorrow @edward_george1 will join the conversation. He is a priest.
 
My parish priest has said the same thing that 1ke is saying

I think it can probably be found in Canon Law, but I’m not certain. If one is travelling to a place where the sacraments are not available, there is not an obligation to go to mass.
 
Last edited:
We aren’t required to avoid traveling.
Ok, so now I see where you’re coming from. Where though is this to be found? On this question I am using Dies Domini, Articles 46 to 49. Perhaps also drawing from cultural experience from a country where Catholics were once persecuted heavily for celebrating mass, yet still did so in Secret on Sundays. This historical bias is definetely going to effect the way I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top