No More Communion Services

  • Thread starter Thread starter RyanK
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think a good “reflection” for such a service would be to read the patristic reading from the Office of Readings of the LOTH (or from the approved two-year monastic lectionary), for that day. The reading would be appropriate to the day or feast, and most certainly from an approved source.

As for the lady that made the inappropriate comments, ISTM that she simply was annoyed that she could no longer be pretend-priest. It sounds like the communion service was serving her need to be at the centre of attention rather than she serving the needs of the communion service and her brothers and sisters in Christ.

There really is little need for a weekday communion service unless a major feast or it’s a day of obligation, or as pointed out, for shut-ins within an institution. And as a big fan of the Divine Office, I really think that’s the preferable option for weekdays when no Mass is possible.
Sorry, but I did not get that from the OP’s post. She was sad not for herself but for the community. Now, according to what the OP reported she could have some misunderstanding about when it is appropriate and when it is not to hold communion services, but not every woman who has ever led a Communion Service has any inclination of wanting to be a priest or believes that women should be allowed to be priests.
 
Interesting, I pulled up a Mass schedule for a parish online and they had a communion service EVERY Monday-Friday in the early morning, AND a Mass a couple of hours later. 🤷

My first thought: WOW that is a lot of communion services.
My second thought: This thread.
 
Precisely the point because the Mass is our proper form of worship, whether we choose to receive or not or whether we are properly disposed or not.

So as far as communion services go, of what benefit is it to me if I’m not properly disposed to receive? Seems as if I can receive the same if not more spiritual benefits if I visit the Blessed Sacrament, no?
Who suggested you weren’t?
 
Why is not the Divine Office one of the options listed here (not a retort to Bells)? If Bible Study is recommended alongside Eucharistic adoration, then surely the Church’s own Divine Office (Liturgy of the Hours) can be recommended as well. I mean, it is part of the cycle of the Church’s official prayers, of which the Holy Eucharist is one part.

If the Church ever intends to re-introduce the chanted Office to the laity, would not the absence of a priest be the perfect lucuna which could be filled in with the Office? :confused:

A pair of religious sisters, working at a Catholic Student Center where I used to attend, helped introduce the chanted Divine Office to me, when Wednesday Mass could not be offered.
What? :confused:

Someone said:
…I would rather see the laity getting involved in doing things like having Bible study (private or at church), devotions, and/or some form of adoration of the Blessed Sacrament if Daily Mass is not available.
and I merely asked “WHY?”
 
I think a good “reflection” for such a service would be to read the patristic reading from the Office of Readings of the LOTH (or from the approved two-year monastic lectionary), for that day. The reading would be appropriate to the day or feast, and most certainly from an approved source.

As for the lady that made the inappropriate comments, ISTM that she simply was annoyed that she could no longer be pretend-priest. It sounds like the communion service was serving her need to be at the centre of attention rather than she serving the needs of the communion service and her brothers and sisters in Christ.

There really is little need for a weekday communion service unless a major feast or it’s a day of obligation, or as pointed out, for shut-ins within an institution. And as a big fan of the Divine Office, I really think that’s the preferable option for weekdays when no Mass is possible.
That’s exactly what I do when I conduct a CS at a retirement home or skilled nursing facility. I would not even think of “giving a reflection” in a setting where people have just listened to Scripture and are preparing to receive Holy Communion.
 
That’s exactly what I do when I conduct a CS at a retirement home or skilled nursing facility. I would not even think of “giving a reflection” in a setting where people have just listened to Scripture and are preparing to receive Holy Communion.
Sometimes we read the homily that Fr. had left for us to read.

Why would you not read the Gospel of the day if you are leading a Communion Service?
 
Sometimes we read the homily that Fr. had left for us to read.

Why would you not read the Gospel of the day if you are leading a Communion Service?
I never suggested I would not read the Gospel of the day. I do. I would just never given a reflection although I would read (verbatim) a homily prepared by my pastor.
 
We are having communion services one evening a week while we are short a priest due to our Pastor being in Rome. The communion service is led by a deacon and I have a question about it. The deacon will give communion using host consecrated by a priest earlier but does not give the blood. Why can’t the blood be consecrated earlier along with the host and give at the communion service?
 
We are having communion services one evening a week while we are short a priest due to our Pastor being in Rome. The communion service is led by a deacon and I have a question about it. The deacon will give communion using host consecrated by a priest earlier but does not give the blood. Why can’t the blood be consecrated earlier along with the host and give at the communion service?
This is because except in extremely rare circumstances, the precious blood is not kept after Mass. All the precious blood consecrated at a given Mass must be consumed at that Mass.
 
We are having communion services one evening a week while we are short a priest due to our Pastor being in Rome. The communion service is led by a deacon and I have a question about it. The deacon will give communion using host consecrated by a priest earlier but does not give the blood. Why can’t the blood be consecrated earlier along with the host and give at the communion service?
In the Latin rite, there is no provision for reserving the consecrated wine.
 
This is because except in extremely rare circumstances, the precious blood is not kept after Mass. All the precious blood consecrated at a given Mass must be consumed at that Mass.
I’d imagine this would be for the very practical reason that in humid weather it might go ‘off’ and then there would be the problem of properly disposing of it.
 
Thanks for the answer. I knew that the blood must be consumed after mass, but I wasn’t sure if it could be specially consecrated for a communion service and held for that. I appreciate your response.
 
Thanks for the answer. I knew that the blood must be consumed after mass, but I wasn’t sure if it could be specially consecrated for a communion service and held for that. I appreciate your response.
The whole reason to have a Communion Service is to give people the chance to receive Communion on a Sunday when a priest isn’t available to celebrate Mass. There would be no reason to reserve consecrated wine for that purpose.
 
The whole reason to have a Communion Service is to give people the chance to receive Communion on a Sunday when a priest isn’t available to celebrate Mass. There would be no reason to reserve consecrated wine for that purpose.
No reason?

I know offering the chalice at a Communion service isn’t done for practical reasons.but your second sentence doesn’t follow on from your first.
 
Wait a second ~ NO lay person can say the Consecration Prayer, not even an ordained deacon. ONLY a priest can consecrate the bread into The Body of Christ, and the same for the Precious Blood. A communion service is only supposed to consist of some opening prayers and the readings for the day, then Holy Communion, with the already-consecrated hosts taken from the tabernacle. A layperson cannot give a homily, or a ‘reflection’. You really need to confront your pastor (charitably), and if you receive no satisfactory response then notify your bishop. Even though these ‘services’ have been stopped, your pastor and bishop need to know what’s been going on.
On another note, this is exactly why women should not be conducting these ‘services’ ~ the political bent, the radical feminism that has permeated the Church, the ‘priestess factor’. Women have their place in the Church, as do laymen, but only a priest may exercise priestly duties.
this is the part of the post that stuck out the most to me too. Forget changing the words, she should not have said anything. This is not a mass, there is no sacrifice, communion is being distributed from the ALREADY consecrated host that is kept in the tabernacle. I have led many SCAPs and there are very strict rules on what should and should not be said. There are many things that are reserved solely for the priest. for example, when the priest says “The Lord be with you” before reading the Gospel, I am not allowed to say this when I read, I just say " a reading from the Holy Gospel acoording…" I am also glad that these services are no longer happening in your church.
 
No reason?

I know offering the chalice at a Communion service isn’t done for practical reasons.but your second sentence doesn’t follow on from your first.
The purpose of a Communion service is to make Communion available in extra-ordinary circumstances. That goal is met with the availablilty of the reserved consecrated hosts. The additional “sign value” that Communion under both kinds provides at Mass does not apply to a Communion service since there is no Sacrifice.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corki
The whole reason to have a Communion Service is to give people the chance to receive Communion on a Sunday when a priest isn’t available to celebrate Mass. There would be no reason to reserve consecrated wine for that purpose.

No reason?

I know offering the chalice at a Communion service isn’t done for practical reasons.but your second sentence doesn’t follow on from your first.

We have a regularly scheduled Communion Service each week in place of a weekday evening Mass. I was wondering why they couldn’t have a consecrated wine along with the host since they know the service is planned. I understand that the consecrated wine cannot be kept on hand for emergencies.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corki

We have a regularly scheduled Communion Service each week in place of a weekday evening Mass. I was wondering why they couldn’t have a consecrated wine along with the host since they know the service is planned. I understand that the consecrated wine cannot be kept on hand for emergencies.

As stated above: the Precious Blood (it is no longer just “consecrated wine” - it ceases to be wine and becomes the Body, BLood, Soul & Divinity of Christ), must be consumed during the mass at which it is consecrated. It may not be stored for later use or transported to another location.​
 
As stated above: the Precious Blood (it is no longer just “consecrated wine” - it ceases to be wine and becomes the Body, BLood, Soul & Divinity of Christ), must be consumed during the mass at which it is consecrated. It may not be stored for later use or transported to another location.
It’s not that categorical. In general practice it can’t be stored because the accidents of the wine will spoil, there is danger of spillage, etc.

OTOH, it can be transported to another location. A sick person who can’t consume even a small amount of the Host may be given a drop of the Precious Blood, which would necessitate its transportation from the church to the hospital.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top