C
caroljm36
Guest
E. Michael Jones wrote this article some time ago culturewars.com/2002/juju.html it’s really long but fascinating… He’s a Catholic teacher and writer, and always very provocative.
This gist of the story is that HIV is a crock and always was, the disease we call AIDS is really just a cluster of maladies stemming from extreme lifestyle–drug abuse, continual STD infections and abuse of antibiotics. He says the powers that be came up with the HIV-AIDS designation to take the heat off of gay lifestyles and make them look like victims instead. This is the key part:"…Only after its viral proteins and nucleic acid components have been identified is it possible to speak of the identification of a new virus. Eighteen years after Margaret Heckler’s [of the Reagan HHS dept] dramatic press conference, that information has yet to be produced. No one since that time has ever published a picture of crystallized HIV particles, nor have any of its proteins or nucleic acids been identified…:
He goes on to say that the reason we keep hearing about AIDS in Africa (which the Church is always beat over the head with) is simply to continue older efforts at population control under the rubric of “health,” since the Africans long ago realized that the Rockefeller Foundation and other NGO do-gooders were terribly anxious that blacks and Asian races reduce* th*eir R populations, i.e. due to massive institutional racism and misguided Malthusian economics.
I am not medically astute enough to know whether Jones’ argument is valid and be interested to hear what others have to say about it.
This gist of the story is that HIV is a crock and always was, the disease we call AIDS is really just a cluster of maladies stemming from extreme lifestyle–drug abuse, continual STD infections and abuse of antibiotics. He says the powers that be came up with the HIV-AIDS designation to take the heat off of gay lifestyles and make them look like victims instead. This is the key part:"…Only after its viral proteins and nucleic acid components have been identified is it possible to speak of the identification of a new virus. Eighteen years after Margaret Heckler’s [of the Reagan HHS dept] dramatic press conference, that information has yet to be produced. No one since that time has ever published a picture of crystallized HIV particles, nor have any of its proteins or nucleic acids been identified…:
He goes on to say that the reason we keep hearing about AIDS in Africa (which the Church is always beat over the head with) is simply to continue older efforts at population control under the rubric of “health,” since the Africans long ago realized that the Rockefeller Foundation and other NGO do-gooders were terribly anxious that blacks and Asian races reduce* th*eir R populations, i.e. due to massive institutional racism and misguided Malthusian economics.
I am not medically astute enough to know whether Jones’ argument is valid and be interested to hear what others have to say about it.