Interesting.
To some degree this is semantics. I consider myself a catholic, that is, I attempt to line up what I believe with what the universal church has historically taught. We should conserve what is right and good and proper in history, most especially the Scriptures, and those traditions and beliefs of men that flow from it. At the same time I cannot get away from the firm belief that forensic justification, for example, is plainly taught in Paul, and that the Reformers were, for the most part, right in their critique of the Catholic Church. Something has gone very badly wrong in church history and we need to figure out how to fix it if we can. Church history is a big hairy mess and doctrinal disputes go into weird territory that I get quickly lost in. So that is the best I can do to describe myself.
I note you call yourself a Roman Catholic. Many on this forum do. There was a thread recently in Apologetics roasting Protestants for using the term as a slam against Catholics.
I do wish we were all in one united visible church - EO, OO, Catholics, Presbyterians, Methodists, etc. I think that is the Lordâs desire, but a lot of people who were in positions of power made bad decisions. I also enjoy the dignity and the depth of the Catholic Church. Thus my âcatholic sympathiesâ.
-Tina