Non-Denominational - What is it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theguidedheart
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

theguidedheart

Guest
I was raised non-denominational, although distanced myself in my early teen years, and eventually found my way to Catholocism which is home as far as I am concerned. My question is, what exactly IS non-denominational? I remember when I was young moving around alot, and as we did, that meant lots of new churches, and it seemed like every church we went to was different. There was no unity between any of these Christian groups. Does this mean that this is a free-for-all, everyone do what they feel set of Christians? My mother and brothers are still follow this denomination, and I would love to begin teaching them about Catholocism, but I want to know how to approach their current beliefs. My short experience in their churches was extremely uncomfortable, and not much more inspiring than listening to anyone off the street telling me what THEY think the bible says. Any insight would be great! Thanks.
 
I am also a new convert, and I grew up southern baptist, went to an independant baptist church for awhile, as well as a non denominational or bible church.

Non denominational churches are the most popular, and fastest growing churches in the United States today. They bring in ussually a high income audience, and they do a lot of singing in the worship and have really good speakers preaching their gospel.

These churches build big buildings, have an active youth program, many are active in their communites. They remind me more of a country club or social club than a church to me.

I drove by a huge church in Dallas, it at an athletic complex, swimming pool, baseball fields and so forth within its huge campus.

I forgot his name but he has several books out and he preaches in Houston TX in the old compact center, his father was an ordained minister but he is not.

In a nutshell these churches will motivate you in your current life using a Christian moral and ethical base. Many are counselors rather than dedicated ministry serving Christ.

Bottom line they are run like a business. They have to bring in an audience to recieve money, so they are trendy you could say, meeting the needs of its members.
 
40.png
theguidedheart:
I was raised non-denominational, although distanced myself in my early teen years, and eventually found my way to Catholocism which is home as far as I am concerned. My question is, what exactly IS non-denominational? I remember when I was young moving around alot, and as we did, that meant lots of new churches, and it seemed like every church we went to was different. There was no unity between any of these Christian groups. Does this mean that this is a free-for-all, everyone do what they feel set of Christians? My mother and brothers are still follow this denomination, and I would love to begin teaching them about Catholocism, but I want to know how to approach their current beliefs. My short experience in their churches was extremely uncomfortable, and not much more inspiring than listening to anyone off the street telling me what THEY think the bible says. Any insight would be great! Thanks.
That’s going to be a tough question to answer. From what I’ve been able to gather, most protestant denominations (Lutheran, Episcopalian, Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, etc.) have a published list of doctrine(s) that spell out what they believe, sometimes why they believe in particular doctrines, and SOMETIMES why they differ in some areas of doctrine with ‘denominations’ with which they share the same name (there are, for instance, “Southern Baptists”, the “American Baptist Association”, “Primitive Baptists”, and (from what I’ve just Googled!) some 50 or more denominations that use the word “Baptist” in naming their churches and likely ALL can trace some roots to the 17th century UK ‘anabaptist’ movement.

So what’s non-denominational? As I understand it, non-denominational churches are private organizations funded by their congregations whose membership has chosen not to be affiliated with any of the larger, well-known, protestant organizations. As to why they’ve made this choice, it seems to differ from church to church: some find no major denomination with which they are in total doctrinal agreement; some may want no organization to aid in the hierarchy or governance of their church (in some non-denominational churches there may be no hierarchy or governance other than by the founding pastor or the pastor asked by the church membership to lead, while other non-denominational churches may be so large that virtually every member is on a committee of some kind to see to the day-to-day operation of the church); some may wish for doctrine to be rather ‘open-ended’ so as not to exclude anyone from the church while some may wish doctrine to be so vague as to exclude EVERYONE who doesn’t fit in what seems to be a ‘broad’ “we welcome all Bible-believing Christians”, etc., and; some seem to fit none of the criteria I’ve listed yet for other reasons find themselves in a situation where they only feel comfortable in calling themselves ‘non-denominational’. And, in at least one case of which I am aware, a Methodist group had about 40 members or so who left the particular Methodist splinter group to which they belonged when that splinter group decided, at some point in the 1970’s, to allow blacks to become members of the church. I have no idea if this group survived as I was aware of it only because they rented a home in my neighborhood and turned it into a ‘church’ and were ‘found out’ and booted out of the rented home because there wasn’t enough parking to accommodate the 10 or 15 cars that showed up 3-4 times a week.

Because of the 1970’s episode, I DO know that this church published a short ‘articles of faith’ on the back of their Sunday bulletins. I think that, were I you, I would ask my Mom and brothers, “now what is it exactly that your church believes?” or “what doctrines does your church hold to be true?” They might, at that point, be able to come up with a Sunday bulletin that lists the general doctrines that the members are expected to hold as a Christian community or, if they’re unable to find anything written or published, I would ask what they BELIEVE the doctrines of the church might be. Start small - something as simple as “Well, do you think that most members believe that Jesus was the Son of God?” You’ll likely already know the answer to that question (and, hopefully, so will they!) and then maybe move onto “What do most of the members believe about the relationship of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit?” Again, more likely than not, you know the answer - they likely believe in the Holy Trinity. This might be a good point to ask if these doctrines are written down anywhere because there definitely ARE non-denominational churches who DO NOT believe in a Triune God as do most Christian denominations. This may be the point where they say that they’ll have to ask their pastor if there are doctrines or ‘articles of faith’ that are written down.

…continued…
 
…continued…

And here - precisely - is where I will through out the ‘caution’ flag: unless you feel prepared to go one-on-one with the pastor of their church in doctrinal apologetics, DO NOT agree to come over to dinner one night so that the pastor might explain things to you more clearly. That’s asking for trouble AND it’s not what you’re really concerned with, is it? You want to know what your Mom and brothers believe and if they can’t tell you without the aid of their pastor, you’d best accept the dinner invitation and bring a friend - a good orthodox priest! But you shouldn’t have to even get to that point - as I said, you want your Mom and brothers to share their faith, their understanding of the doctrines of how and why they worship God in the manner that they do and, if those things are not written down, just let the discussion flow and explain what you believe, how you came to the knowledge that your beliefs are true, and don’t be shy about asking your family to allow you to share your faith not only because you love them but primarily because Christ loves them and you want to share Christ’s perfect love for them as imperfectly as you can and as imperfectly as you’re able to love them.

In all that you do when you share your faith with others you must - must - always begin with prayer and I, personally, must always make certain that I ask God to keep me humble; I always ask Him to make certain that if Ben comes up in conversation it is only in relation to Christ. Sharing the Gospel is something that brings such joy that it’s sometimes easy to forget that YOU were just a clumsy messenger and that the joy you feel isn’t pride but rather Christ again and forever sharing His Love and His Sacrifice with us.

Take care and I’ll be sure to watch this thread! There a so many more folks here with far more experience than myself in sharing the Lord with family members!
 
Hi Guys,
I was going to ask the same as theguidedheart. John Paul III and Ben_dry thanks for explaining them.

So in other word, they are not belong to Protestant or other denominational churches. What we, as catholic, call them? Is it just Christian? I got a little bit amazed with this kind of church, I used to have a friend, he was non-den, he asked me to join with his church. Seems they are quite fundamental as well. He also speaks strong about the Pope. Ah well at the end, they are just like other non catholic groups.
 
John Paul III:
I am also a new convert, and I grew up southern baptist, went to an independant baptist church for awhile, as well as a non denominational or bible church.

Non denominational churches are the most popular, and fastest growing churches in the United States today. They bring in ussually a high income audience, and they do a lot of singing in the worship and have really good speakers preaching their gospel.

These churches build big buildings, have an active youth program, many are active in their communites. They remind me more of a country club or social club than a church to me.

I drove by a huge church in Dallas, it at an athletic complex, swimming pool, baseball fields and so forth within its huge campus.

I forgot his name but he has several books out and he preaches in Houston TX in the old compact center, his father was an ordained minister but he is not.

In a nutshell these churches will motivate you in your current life using a Christian moral and ethical base. Many are counselors rather than dedicated ministry serving Christ.

Bottom line they are run like a business. They have to bring in an audience to recieve money, so they are trendy you could say, meeting the needs of its members.
I was wondering if these churches - which I first noticed popping up like kudzu (for you on the west coast who have never travelled to the southeastern U.S. kudzu is a weed that destroys all surrounding vegetation as the vines grow about 24 feet per day <<<exaggeration, but not by much…) in the early 1970’s were as large and, well, kudzu-like in other regions of the U.S. or if, like kudzu, they were largely contained in the south. My wife actually called them ‘kudzu churches’ as we were of the opinion that they were largely southeastern - going no further west than Texas/Oklahoma, no further north than Virginia, and only cropping up occasionally in the non-coastal beltway of Florida. I don’t recall, for example, seeing any of the mega-nondenominational nor the micro-nondenominational churches driving the back roads of New England, the Pacific Northwest, etc.

Someday someone may write a history of where these nondenominational churches were born, why they became so popular, etc. But until then, we’ll just have to get by with hearsay, I suppose, and after reading some of the messages here, it’s becoming clear that these churches (both mega and micro) are no longer distinctly southern (although they may well have had their roots in the south).

It seems as if many of these churches began as ‘Assembly of God’ denominations yet either withdrew from that denomination (or, in the case of Jimmy Swaggart were tossed out - although for all I know he may have repented and been allowed back as a minister of that denomination?). Oh, and to the original poster, here’s how the “Jimmy Swaggart Ministries” are described on the front page of the website:
Located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Jimmy Swaggart Ministries has been raised up by God to reach the world. JSM is called of God to do the following:
Code:
* To see souls saved
* The sick healed
* Bondages broken
* Believers baptized with the Holy Spirit
* The Exposition of Bible Doctrine
* To teach and preach the Revelation of the Cross
I would think that your Mom’s and brother’s church would at the very least have some sort of 'mission statement like that on printed material and, if so, from there some points of doctrine are easily drawn upon to see just what is meant. Just using these as an example, here are some ‘discussion points’ that can be raised:
  • To see souls saved
What is meant by ‘saved’ exactly? Can one ‘gain’ yet lose salvation?
  • The sick healed
In what manner does God heal the sick? Can we presume that it is His will that all the sick be healed?
  • Bondages broken
Bondages? Bondage to sin, I’m assuming. How does one break bondage to sin? What does the New Testament have to say about that which is bound and loosed upon earth being bound and loosed in heaven? Who has the power to release sin from bondage? How are we taught to do so?
  • Believers baptized with the Holy Spirit
What actually happens when we’re baptized? What are the fruits of baptism? What are other sacraments which infuse us with the Holy Spirit
  • The Exposition of Bible Doctrine
Where do we find doctrine? Is it only in the Bible? What assures us that doctrine is sound?
  • To teach and preach the Revelation of the Cross
What is the ‘Revelation of the Cross’? Isn’t it Sacrifice - Perfect Sacrifice given once and yet eternal? How can we experience God’s Sacrifice in our lives?

I know I’m overstating my point, but I think you see what I mean.

And to others outside the southern U.S. - ARE nondenominational churches proliferating ‘out there’ as rapidly as ‘down here’?
 
40.png
cute2904:
Hi Guys,
I was going to ask the same as theguidedheart. John Paul III and Ben_dry thanks for explaining them.

So in other word, they are not belong to Protestant or other denominational churches. What we, as catholic, call them? Is it just Christian? I got a little bit amazed with this kind of church, I used to have a friend, he was non-den, he asked me to join with his church. Seems they are quite fundamental as well. He also speaks strong about the Pope. Ah well at the end, they are just like other non catholic groups.
Cute,

Down here, in the southern U.S., most of the non-denominational churches are very much ‘fundamental, evangelical’ Christians. BUT - and I know of no study of this and am only repeating that which I have heard - the extremely large non-denominational churches, where peoples of all colors and socioeconomic groups gather, tend to be much less ‘fundamentalist’ although they would certainly consider themselves evangelical.

The much smaller non-denominational churches that sprout up and come-and-go at a pretty fast rate seem to be much, much more ‘fundamental’ and are almost ‘cult-like’ (in the bad definition of the world ‘cult’). They have charismatic leaders and do occasionally blossom into mega-churches but only if the leaders are not of the fundamentalist stripe, found all too often down here, who are racist and not very well educated.

Those smaller non-denominationals don’t really die out - when one shuts down (for whatever reason) there’s another ready to take over the mortgage of the small building and another pastor will roll in with his congregation. Then that congregation may splinter, the pastor may leave (or die), the mortgage switches hands again and the only thing that changes is the sign (if there is a sign - sometimes there is no sign and if one didn’t know that the building functioned as a church he or she may believe it to be simply an untidy white cinder block structure with gravel and dirt in place of a yard).

And you may find out that ‘Billy Hodges’ (FAKE NAME!!!) - a kid who used to pester you during the summers when you were a kid - “made a preacher” while he was in prison for armed robbery and he’s the shepherd of this ‘new’ flock. That’s one term - “made a preacher” - which I’ve never heard outside of the south. It simply means that God ‘called’ this particular man (and he needs no formal training as long as he can preach and the more evil the life he’s led the better, for he’s wallowed in and definitely experienced the sins which he now rails against) and so families are quite proud when a relative “makes a preacher”: it’s not a full-time job, it pays little if anything, but it’s quite a prestigious ‘calling’.

Lest you think that I’m just gathering together some hearsay and concocting a fable, ‘Billy Hodges’ is the cousin of one of my childhood friends and he still has a congregation of 50 or so sheep in Hanceville, Alabama (not too far away from Mother Angelica’s Shrine of the Most Blessed Sacrament at Our Lady of the Angels Monastery - something I find rather ironic).

In summation, I would bet that there are more ‘flavors’ of non-denominational churches than there are actual denominations in the protestant world. Each one with a different outlook on the same doctrine, or even something so small as a different interpretation of one verse from the Apocalypse.

I found one website that lists the “mega-churches” in the U.S. and just a quick look at the state with the most - California - seems to indicate (haven’t actually taken the time to count!) that about a third - maybe more - are non-denominational. In my state there are 18 mega-churches listed and only two listed as non-denominational.

The whole thing is kind of scary to me - I suppose that, being Catholic, I recognize that there is some dissent (and sometimes great dissent) but I believe that, in the end, we are, truly, a ‘universal’ Church. Some people may pick which doctrines they will or will not believe but at least the doctrines are there, have been since the beginning of the Church, and are unchangeable.

That doesn’t seem to be the way doctrines ‘work’ in non-denominational churches. Sometimes, there are no doctrines. Sometimes they’re unwritten. Sometimes they are harsh and completely ‘un-Christian’.

So not a day goes by that I do not thank the Lord for giving us and of Himself the assurance that our doctrine will never become corrupt.
 
40.png
ben_dy:
there are, for instance, “Southern Baptists”, the “American Baptist Association”, “Primitive Baptists”, and (from what I’ve just Googled!) some 50 or more denominations that use the word “Baptist” in naming their churches
Which explains a lot about the non-denominational church craze. Protestant seminaries pump out way more graduates with divinity degrees than there are jobs available for those that earn those degrees. A newly ordained Evangelical Protestant fresh from college is going to have a rough time finding a decent paying job in an existing Protestant denomination. The good paying jobs in the denominational churches are more than likely not available to him, and if he joins an existing denominational church as a poorly paid associate pastor and hangs around for the next twenty years, he might be given the job of pastor when the current pastor retires. But if he is ambitious, after a few years as an associate pastor, he can start up a “non-denominational” church and create a new congregation from every stripe of Protestant that exists. The potential source of members for a new non-denominational church is a lot greater than what is available to him if he limits himself to starting up a denominational church.

Protesant pastors live off the tithe, and to some extent that is driving the non-denominational church craze .
 
40.png
theguidedheart:
I was raised non-denominational, although distanced myself in my early teen years, and eventually found my way to Catholocism which is home as far as I am concerned. My question is, what exactly IS non-denominational? I remember when I was young moving around alot, and as we did, that meant lots of new churches, and it seemed like every church we went to was different. There was no unity between any of these Christian groups. Does this mean that this is a free-for-all, everyone do what they feel set of Christians? My mother and brothers are still follow this denomination, and I would love to begin teaching them about Catholocism, but I want to know how to approach their current beliefs. My short experience in their churches was extremely uncomfortable, and not much more inspiring than listening to anyone off the street telling me what THEY think the bible says. Any insight would be great! Thanks.
I know this will sound simplistic, but I see non-denominational people as those who will not commit to any one ideology. They take a smorgasboard approach, scanning the buffet line looking for what most appeals to them, picking and choosing baed on the charisma of the pastor, the rock-and-roll music, the youth group, the single group, etc. In most cases, the non-denominational are more about the sizzle rather than the steak. The non-denominational church is a phenomenom of the 1990’s. Really, the churches compete for one another through slick advertising promising salvation and a relatively good time.
 
40.png
jim1130:
I know this will sound simplistic, but I see non-denominational people as those who will not commit to any one ideology. They take a smorgasboard approach, scanning the buffet line looking for what most appeals to them, picking and choosing baed on the charisma of the pastor, the rock-and-roll music, the youth group, the single group, etc. In most cases, the non-denominational are more about the sizzle rather than the steak. The non-denominational church is a phenomenom of the 1990’s. Really, the churches compete for one another through slick advertising promising salvation and a relatively good time.
And this has been my take on it as well. It may be simplistic, but this is how I saw it as well. I have found myself in alot of very uncomfortable situations attending non-denominational churches (and believe me I’ve been to my fair share), but it has always seemed that I have been listening to the man giving his sermon, more than I have to the word of god in those types of churches. Growing up mostly in California, I definitely saw HUGE ties to the money aspect of those churches, many of them were the size of a football game, where you could hardly see the person talking if not for the large screens that would relay their image. They were very impersonal, and felt very ‘off the cuff’ in the way they were delivered. There were some really good points mentioned above by everyone, and I will certaintly take those to heart. I’m sure there are many others who have been in the difficult siutation of balancing the commandment to ‘honor your parents’, while at the same time wanting with all of their heart and soul to show them the beautiful things that the Caholic Church has shown them. This is my position, where is it my right to step in and tell my own mother the truth - afterall, she tried to raise me under the supposed ‘truth’ shown to her in the non-denominational churches. Thats a hard thing to argue when she sees something as being completely truth, and I see something as being completely truth - although I am fortunate to have 2000 years of history backing me up. I will certaintly take into consideration some of the things mentioned above by everyone, I appreciate your responses. God bless you, and pray for me that I find the opportunity and strength to show my own family the true path to Christ through the Catholic Church.
 
All and all… what is the main purpose of this so called 'cult-like" Christian groups? if some of the are racist and not well educated ( this racist issue was brought up into converstation between me and my friend at that time 😦 ) Is there any possibility that all about the money behind this cults ( I cant find proper words for small groups that are now growing rapidly in the entire US and Asia)?
 
Good evening everyone! One of your resident Non-Denoms here! 🙂

The fact is, non-denominationalism is so popular now-a-days because each denomination out there has such a bad connotation attached to it, in one way or another, that there are those out there (myself included) who don’t want to be attached with them because of the choices made by that denomination and/or their person(s) in charge. We just want to be considered christian. We follow Christ, alone, and try to adhere to His words as best as we possibly can. Are we better than anyone out there? No. Do we know more than anyone out there? Again, no. But we are trying a different approach. By taking out man’s titles and laws and leaving it up to Christ (this is how we view it) we feel as if we can obtain a closer relationship with Him. Christ did not call His church catholic or baptist or anything else. We were just His CHURCH in His own words. Being the body of Christ with our fellow christians in other denominations we feel that if we take out the denominational titles and laws made up by man we can get back to the core understanding of what Christ is talking about. You may not agree but I am answering your question to the best of my knowledge. Thank you. 🙂 Singinbeauty prepares to be bombarded with flaming accusations or charges… 😉
 
in one way or another, that there are those out there (myself included) who don’t want to be attached with them because of the choices made by that denomination and/or their person(s) in charge.
You are correct, my personal opinion… denomination is just about comfortness. If you feel comfort in catholic, then let it be, if you feel in non den let it be. God judges our deeds not by seeing what denomination we are belong but what we have done for humanity and fod God.
We just want to be considered christian. We follow Christ, alone, and try to adhere to His words as best as we possibly can. Are we better than anyone out there? No. Do we know more than anyone out there? Again, no. But we are trying a different approach
not much difference with catholic basically.
By taking out man’s titles and laws and leaving it up to Christ (this is how we view it) we feel as if we can obtain a closer relationship with Him. Christ did not call His church catholic or baptist or anything else. We were just His CHURCH in His own words.
Catholic mean Unversal… had anybody claimed that they are not attached to any other denomination, then it sould be catholics who said that.
Being the body of Christ with our fellow christians in other denominations we feel that if we take out the denominational titles and laws made up by man we can get back to the core understanding of what Christ is talking about. You may not agree but I am answering your question to the best of my knowledge. Thank you
I’m sorry, you mention about laws made up by man? … you mean pope?.. 😃
 
I’m sorry, you mention about laws made up by man? … you mean pope?..
No, actually I mean what I said… ‘by man’. When man gets any sort of power or leverage over other humans man tends to let it go to their heads. And when you get a group of humans with a power trip it gets worse. The message of Christ has not and will never change. I think we can all agree with this. But unfortunately, throughout history, humans have displayed over and over again that their human tendancies will do their best to try and overshadow God’s work. It has happened in EVERY denomination, including catholocism. This is where non-denom comes into play. You may see it as cafateria christianity but I see it as searching for Christ beyond man and their egos… 🙂
 
40.png
Singinbeauty:
No, actually I mean what I said… ‘by man’. When man gets any sort of power or leverage over other humans man tends to let it go to their heads. And when you get a group of humans with a power trip it gets worse. The message of Christ has not and will never change. I think we can all agree with this. But unfortunately, throughout history, humans have displayed over and over again that their human tendancies will do their best to try and overshadow God’s work. It has happened in EVERY denomination, including catholocism. This is where non-denom comes into play. You may see it as cafateria christianity but I see it as searching for Christ beyond man and their egos… 🙂
I am glad you are here to answer these questions. A dear friend of mine is caught in a sort of ‘circle of confusion’ with her non-denom church. I am hoping that based on what you state here you might be able to help me understand her struggle.

So WHAT is man-made and what is God-made? For a Catholic we believe Jesus set up a structure and a visible Church which we could look for authority. We are the first to acknowledge that corruption and evil exist, even within Catholicism.

I do not understand how folks in these types of churches define ‘man-made.’ My other question as has been addressed a little already: how is every church a “non-denominational?” If even two groups profess the same things and use the same name (ie. Calvary, or Vineyard in my local area) didn’t they just ‘denominate’ themselves that way? Meaning, that denomination at its most basic definition really means “name” doesn’t it? Does escaping the name of a group really change anything?

How do these groups decide what is God’s work? As humans we have to have something resembling structure don’t we? Scripture shows the set-up of the bishopric, why do ‘Bible-believers’ not follow it?

Thanks in advance for any insight you might be able to provide.
 
40.png
Singinbeauty:
Good evening everyone! One of your resident Non-Denoms here! 🙂

The fact is, non-denominationalism is so popular now-a-days because each denomination out there has such a bad connotation attached to it, in one way or another, that there are those out there (myself included) who don’t want to be attached with them because of the choices made by that denomination and/or their person(s) in charge. We just want to be considered christian. We follow Christ, alone, and try to adhere to His words as best as we possibly can. Are we better than anyone out there? No. Do we know more than anyone out there? Again, no. But we are trying a different approach. By taking out man’s titles and laws and leaving it up to Christ (this is how we view it) we feel as if we can obtain a closer relationship with Him. Christ did not call His church catholic or baptist or anything else. We were just His CHURCH in His own words. Being the body of Christ with our fellow christians in other denominations we feel that if we take out the denominational titles and laws made up by man we can get back to the core understanding of what Christ is talking about. You may not agree but I am answering your question to the best of my knowledge. Thank you. 🙂 Singinbeauty prepares to be bombarded with flaming accusations or charges… 😉
I want to try to understand your position but I admit that I have a difficult time in understanding what you mean when you say that you - and, I’m assuming, members of your church and other non-denominational churches - “can get back to the core understanding of what Christ is talking about”. In saying, as well, “we follow Christ, alone, and try to adhere to His words as best as we possibly can”, I seem to get a sense that, as a ‘bible’, for those who are non-denominational, the Gospels alone are sufficient to as a sort of ‘only canon’ of the New Testament and that the titles, structure, laws (or instructions) from the Apostles that make up (for the most part - excluding the Apocalypse for the moment) the remainder of the NT are superfluous to “ecclesia”?

Before I prattle on and make assumptions about beliefs that would necessarily follow a system or structure which is solely Gospels based, I’ll await your response to make sure that I’m understanding you correctly.

Well - two additional questions… you use the word ‘church’ so I assume that you gather with like-minded believers and so my first question is: do you have a printed or oral common creed which declares basic communally shared beliefs? Now to my second question (an extension of the first, I guess!): of you have no written ‘articles of faith’ or no verbal ‘creed’ are the beliefs of the individual respected so that he or she might still be called ‘Christian’, if that is their desire? If, for instance, I believed in an historical Jesus and wanted to pattern the moral structure of my life around the words which Jesus spoke BUT I did not believe Jesus to be divine or of divine origin but only a man who was killed for his teachings - not even a prophet or messenger of God - would there be others in your congregation who might also believe the same or, if not, are the basic beliefs of others in the congregation broad enough so that I would, at least, be ‘allowed’ (that’s not quite the word I’m looking for but will have to suffice for now!) to call myself a Christian and to be fully accepted into the congregation (and trusted enough to count the money after bingo 🙂 )?

As is probably obvious, my exposure to non-denominational churches and, to a lesser extent, members of non-denominational churches is pretty limited. The way you’ve expressed your experience is dissimilar to what I’ve heard from my limited circle of friends and it seems that your explanation is much more ‘liberal’ than that which I have experienced or been told of. I hope you don’t think my intention is to send flaming arrows of accusations your way - I’m just trying to achieve a better understanding of what ‘non-denominational’ means outside of my little circle of friends.
 
Interesting Thread this is of the Mega Churches, at which there are several in my area of Detroit Michigan.

The first one I ever saw was a Holy Roller mega church up in Southfield Mich, then my local Ward **Presbyterian, **moved like 5 miles west, then supersized itself, to a huge plot of land, much bigger than Ive ever seen before.

I have attended a Holy Roller Mega Church once or twice, but never wanted to be a member of such a mega crowd.

There is The **Greater Grace Temple **(mega church) exactly one mile east of me in Detroit Michigan, had a very unusual church service on Wednesday Nov 2, 2005. It was a funeral of Rosa Parks(1913-2005), that lasted over 6 hours, and it was very un-church like in it’s service, because of it’s open format and the type of people that spoke.

I went to the funeral, that day, because it was only a one mile short walk, and the helicopters kept buzzing over my house all morning, but I didn’t get to go inside that mega-church.

This is a Google Earth shot of the Greater Grace Temple: i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/GotGPS/Rosa_Parks_Funeral_-Greater_Grace.jpg

News story of funeral:
cnn.com/2005/US/11/02/rosa.parks.ap/

The problem I have with attending churches with a smaller crowd, is the tendency of the churches to close their doors soon after I start going there. The first one that closed, was the Re-organized LDS church in Detroit, then the St Agatha Catholic Church near my house.

The Mega Churches are just like Wal-Marts that capture the people away from the smaller churches, since I can count about 4 mega churches near me off the top of my head.

St Agatha was a good sized catholic church that could seat a few hundred people, but the attendance fell to almost nothing, and it closed Aug 28, 2005.
 
40.png
Geocacher:
The problem I have with attending churches with a smaller crowd, is the tendency of the churches to close their doors soon after I start going there. The first one that closed, was the Re-organized LDS church in Detroit, then the St Agatha Catholic Church near my house.
St Agatha was a good sized catholic church that could seat a few hundred people, but the attendance fell to almost nothing, and it closed Aug 28, 2005.
St Agatha in Redford? my that is sad news, it used to be a very large, dynamic congregation. My first boyfriend went there, and we attended many youth events there.

Non-denominational, as I have gathered from people who classify themselves with this term, means that you have rejected the notion of professing any creed or doctrinal formulation, and that you will listen to any preacher or pastor because of his personal qualities and charisma, without any concern about his training, education or orthodoxy.

There seems to be a difference between 1] small, non-denominational congregations who form among laypersons, usually those who have left a larger mainline congregation for reasons having nothing to do with doctrine, and then call (hire) their own pastor, and 2] mega-churches which are formed like any other business enterprise by a self-styled preacher who may or may not have any type of seminary credentials, ordination etc. who then advertises and builds a congregation the way any other business grows. In either case the emphasis is on the comfort level and emotional satisfaction of the members, personal interpretation of scripture, and personal choice on accepting or rejecting traditional Christian doctrine and practice.
 
Part 2:

Finally, the idea that they are choosing a “denomination” that doesn’t find its “laws, teachings, doctrines” from that of a man is a fallacy. The difference between these “denominations” and the Catholic Church is only what “man” to whom they submit and obey- Themselves, their pastor, or the Magisterium/Pope of the Catholic Church. Only one can have a monopoly on the Truth as inspired by the Holy Spirit. They all can’t be right.

The idea that we are each our own Magisterium discounts the idea that the Holy Spirit is among us and leading us to a single Universal Truth. It discounts that the Holy Spirit could lead a group of sinful men to make inspired decisions and present inspired unerring Teachings. It instead exalts each individual to almost God-like capabilities.

I submit to a Magisterium that has held true to its Teachings for 2,000 years since the Christ physically returned to Heaven. This fidelity to its Teachings is evidence of its confidence in the power and capability of the Holy Spirit. I don’t belong to a “denomination” that essentially began when I was born (becoming MY magisterium). The Church teaches that my life on earth is a continual journey toward eternity filled with continuous opportunities to turn toward God or away from Him. This freedom to love God or reject God shows how much God loves us and wants us to love Him freely. I’m not saved by a single act of my will. The Church tells me that when I can’t feel God (the “dry times” or “faith is weak”) that I can find Him when I live by the principles of this past Sunday’s Gospel reading (whatsoever you do to the least of your brethren, you do unto Me), He promises me that the Holy Spirit is working in me and that it will feed my faith even in the dry times. The Church doesn’t try to reduce the incomprehensible (God in all His infinite power, knowledge, presence, wisdom and eternity) and His complexity to something simple and comprehensible. I’m called to always develop my knowledge of God and then take that knowledge into the world to do His will. I have a Church that helps me identify what “revelation” is from God and what “revelation” is from Satan. I have a Church that gives me sacraments that will feed and protect my soul and gives me graces to overcome the evil and temptation of this world.

If you read the above paragraph, there is one common theme. I have a Church that is greater than me just as I have a God that is greater than me. If I were my own magisterium, my church/denomination is only as holy as I am holy. What a meager, sinful, and weak church. Christ wants more for me and everyone than to find hope in a run-down shanty.
 
40.png
Singinbeauty:
One of your resident Non-Denoms here! 🙂

The fact is, non-denominationalism is so popular now-a-days because each denomination out there has such a bad connotation attached to it, in one way or another, that there are those out there (myself included) who don’t want to be attached with them because of the choices made by that denomination and/or their person(s) in charge. We just want to be considered christian. We follow Christ, alone, and try to adhere to His words as best as we possibly can. Are we better than anyone out there? No. Do we know more than anyone out there? Again, no. But we are trying a different approach. By taking out man’s titles and laws and leaving it up to Christ (this is how we view it) we feel as if we can obtain a closer relationship with Him. Christ did not call His church catholic or baptist or anything else. We were just His CHURCH in His own words. Being the body of Christ with our fellow christians in other denominations we feel that if we take out the denominational titles and laws made up by man we can get back to the core understanding of what Christ is talking about.
Singing, thank you for this post. It is actually one of the most lucid explanations I’ve ever heard (trying to focus on the core teachings of Christ) for the rationale of being non-denominational. This is a natural human desire- to reduce the complex to the simple. We focus our attention and priorities all the time in our temporal life. We join a political party based on its core principles to simplify the complexity of the political issues. We join a service club (Rotary, Lions etc.) based on its core priorities to simplify our charitable efforts. We join a social circle based on its core interests to simplify our leisure time and emotional commitments. In all cases, we also aspire to be active in these organizations because they feed our need for social interaction with like minded people and allow us to not be overwhelmed.

But rhetorically I ask, is this the intent of Jesus Christ when He bound together the Jewish people under one faith or told the Apostles to be leaders and go forth and bring people to the Father? IMHO, this is contrary to Christ’s intent. He didn’t want us to form cliques of like-minded people who focus on their own inspired determination of His “core teachings.” He wanted us to look beyond ourselves, become dead to ourselves and find new life in Him.

The process of “finding the church right for me” is about finding a home for where I am today. I’ll stay as long as I agree w/ my Pastor and my fellow members of the congregation. If I grow or change, I’ll go find a new home. Where is the idea of Universal Truth? Where is the idea of Universal Teaching? By definition, it can’t exist in this environment. Its adherents basically believe in a Magisterium of one-themselves. Is this Christ’s intent? Doesn’t it seem that the individual is assuming a role exclusively the prerogative of the Holy Spirit?

Isn’t it ironic that they accept the Bible as inspired by the Holy Spirit but reject the Magisterium that He worked through?

Continued in Part 2
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top