Non-fallible teachings: any examples?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAdvocate
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Vatican says contraception is an intrinsically evil act, it does not suffer any exceptions.
So there is no exception in the case of rape and it is intrinsically evil for a woman to contracept by washing out the semen after being raped? The woman has just been raped and now you are saying that she will go to hell if she contracepts? Shouldn’t a Christian show a little mercy to a victim of a horrific crime?
 
So there is no exception in the case of rape and it is intrinsically evil for a woman to contracept by washing out the semen after being raped? The woman has just been raped and now you are saying that she will go to hell if she contracepts?
You use the word “contracept” in a physical way here, whereas the Church speaks of moral acts. There is in fact no context here where contraception (the “moral act”) is a possible act! The act that placed semen in her body is not the act deserving of the respect some are mistaking it for. It would be no different if insemination had been via turkey baster. Of course the material may be flushed away. I suspect we are in agreement Tom. :eek:
 
You use the word “contracept” in a physical way here, whereas the Church speaks of moral acts. There is in fact no context here where contraception (the “moral act”) is a possible act! The act that placed semen in her body is not the act deserving of the respect some are mistaking it for. It would be no different if insemination had been via turkey baster. Of course the material may be flushed away. I suspect we are in agreement Tom. :eek:
Doesn’t contracept mean act against conception?
 
So there is no exception in the case of rape and it is intrinsically evil for a woman to contracept by washing out the semen after being raped? The woman has just been raped and now you are saying that she will go to hell if she contracepts? Shouldn’t a Christian show a little mercy to a victim of a horrific crime?
The good news is that it matters very little whether “a Christian” shows a little mercy or not. Whether or not someone goes to hell depends on God’s mercy and discerning, not how some rule-crazed pencil pusher wrongly interprets Church teaching. Anyone is free to shrilly and incessantly spout off their understanding of the “rules” without listening to what is actually going on, but that isn’t what God does. God listens. And it’s His mercy that matters when it comes to the question of someone going to hell.
 
Doesn’t contracept mean act against conception?
That’s an act of the purely physical order and may lack any moral meaning at all. A bit like “decapitate”. The behaviour the Church opposes and which it calls “contraception” is an act with moral meaning. It can arise when a couple engages in conjugal relations. It cannot arise when a violent person seeks to inseminate a woman through an act of rape.
 
So there is no exception in the case of rape and it is intrinsically evil for a woman to contracept by washing out the semen after being raped? The woman has just been raped and now you are saying that she will go to hell if she contracepts? Shouldn’t a Christian show a little mercy to a victim of a horrific crime?
I would gladly show mercy to all people of goodwill. But how i react does not change the fact that God is the sole and ultimate judge. Right after physical death, he judges and informs the soul where her eternal residence will be. My own mother had a tubal ligation procedure because of a tough marriage and she had more than she could handle kids-wise. She sees nothing wrong with it nearly 40 years afterwards. Have all her confessions of the past 38 years been invalid, will she die with what God considers final impenitence? Will she have suffered a life of constant adversity, mental issues, having her youngest child cut off all ties with her, being married to an aloof, unsupportive, unstable, alcoholic husband to end up in hell? Apart from this vague concept of ‘‘mercy’’, nothing tells me our loving God will welcome her. Trust in God’s goodness? How good is he when one mortal sin is enough to be cast out into the outer darkness? Is my mom’s soul dead from that procedure? Could be. Yeah the good news…

.Meanwhile if a mafia or gang boss, who hasn’t been baptized, finds out he has a terminal disease (with weeks left to live) and decides to be baptized, provided he doesn’t sin after his baptism, he’ll go straight to heaven! (sic) I think God himself is the main source of misotheism.
 
Meanwhile if a mafia or gang boss, who hasn’t been baptized, finds out he has a terminal disease (with weeks left to live) and decides to be baptized, provided he doesn’t sin after his baptism, he’ll go straight to heaven! (sic) I think God himself is the main source of misotheism.
An objection similar to this was raised earlier, but I didn’t see an answer. Another dilemma is when a person has lived a good and decent life up to the last moment, when he slips up and misses Mass on a Sunday and then dies the next day without having repented of his mortal sin. Would it be justice for that person go to eternal fire and torment in hell, while the mafia boss goes to heaven?
 
An objection similar to this was raised earlier, but I didn’t see an answer. Another dilemma is when a person has lived a good and decent life up to the last moment, when he slips up and misses Mass on a Sunday and then dies the next day without having repented of his mortal sin. Would it be justice for that person go to eternal fire and torment in hell, while the mafia boss goes to heaven?
I’m not sure slip ups are punished too harshly. What we know for sure is that only God knows one’s souls and final destination, and that it will be just.
 
Can anyone think of a few examples of teachings that are NOT infallibly taught to the faithful, but that we are still required to assent to by what Vatican II calls “religious assent” of the will and intellect? (Please do not use the prohibition against contraception…I believe this is infallible because it is unanimously taught by the bishops worldwide and has been so since the beginning.)
Likely to be the common teachings of the Church which the Magisterium has not certainly decided upon, for example:
  • The justified also require actual grace for the performance of salutary acts. (Sent. communis.)
  • The Saints in Heaven also can come to the help of the Souls in Purgatory by their intercession. (Sent. communis.)
  • Suffrages are of no profit to the damned in Hell as they do not belong to the Mystical Body of Christ. (Sent. communis.)
 
I would gladly show mercy to all people of goodwill. But how i react does not change the fact that God is the sole and ultimate judge. Right after physical death, he judges and informs the soul where her eternal residence will be. My own mother had a tubal ligation procedure because of a tough marriage and she had more than she could handle kids-wise. She sees nothing wrong with it nearly 40 years afterwards. Have all her confessions of the past 38 years been invalid, will she die with what God considers final impenitence? Will she have suffered a life of constant adversity, mental issues, having her youngest child cut off all ties with her, being married to an aloof, unsupportive, unstable, alcoholic husband to end up in hell? Apart from this vague concept of ‘‘mercy’’, nothing tells me our loving God will welcome her. Trust in God’s goodness? How good is he when one mortal sin is enough to be cast out into the outer darkness? Is my mom’s soul dead from that procedure? Could be. Yeah the good news…

.Meanwhile if a mafia or gang boss, who hasn’t been baptized, finds out he has a terminal disease (with weeks left to live) and decides to be baptized, provided he doesn’t sin after his baptism, he’ll go straight to heaven! (sic) I think God himself is the main source of misotheism.
If the mafia boss only wants to be baptized in an attempt to not go to hell, it isn’t sincere repentance. I don’t know if you read about imperfect contrition

catholic.com/quickquestions/is-it-possible-for-a-person-with-a-mortal-sin-still-on-his-soul-to-die-and-go-to-heav

If he sincerely repents, he deserves to go to heaven. That’s the good news. Because we are all sinners. And by right, we don’t deserve God, but God wants us to want him.
As for a good person’s salvation, you don’t know. That’s the thing. Your mother might not be fully culpable for her sin. She might have repented in her heart.

I don’t know why this reminds me of the parable Jesus told…not exactly similar to this situation but it just popped in my mind… Matthew 20:1-16

I empathise with you because i have been in a similar situation, but you need to realize that God is just…and merciful. Sometimes we humans don’t understand bc we expect him to play by our rules
 
It seems that you are the one who is questioning the teaching of the Catholic Church on the justice of God and the fact that one mortal sin will send you to hell?
newtheologicalmovement.blogspot.com/2014/09/will-i-really-go-to-hell-for-just-one.html
It seems as if you think God is bound by the incoherent ramblings of one priest on a random blog, or that such ramblings are infallible teachings of the Church. If so, you are quite mistaken. I might have missed it, but does this blog have an imprimatur? You would do much better to read the parables of Jesus than the nonsense you are linking to. They actually carry some weight.
 
It’s important to understand what the act of contraception is before throwing out objections.

Contraception applies to an act, not a substance. I have a UCC pastor friend who insists the Church condemns his daughter because she had to take hormones as medication for a condition. I love the guy, but DUH, he will not listen to what the Church itself says about contraception. Instead he prefers to condemn the Church for it’s imagined condemnation. There is no excuse for obstinate ignorance.

Contraception applies to an act not a specific result. “Birth control” is not necessarily the same thing as contraception.
So in other words, abstinence is NOT contraception. Not-acting is not the same as acting. Although in both cases no children are conceived, they are not the same thing,. Contraception is a conjugal act which is at the same time “against” conception.

Question:
is rape a conjugal act?
 
It seems as if you think God is bound by the incoherent ramblings of one priest on a random blog, or that such ramblings are infallible teachings of the Church. If so, you are quite mistaken. I might have missed it, but does this blog have an imprimatur? You would do much better to read the parables of Jesus than the nonsense you are linking to. They actually carry some weight.
I didn’t understand the teaching that one unrepented mortal sin can send you to hell as the " the incoherent ramblings of one priest". I thought it was Catholic teaching?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top