Non-infallible teachings

[Astrochemist]

You are not describing a limited faithful dissent from one particular non-infallible teaching or another,
but a blanket dissent that places science above faith, and that disregards the authority of the Magisterium.

This is what I think and believe. I don’t see it as “placing science above faith”, but rather taking faith seriously. If what I believe is an essential truth, then it should be true everywhere.

Also, infallible teachings of the Magisterium, including the ordinary and universal Magisterium, do not allow for any faithful dissent, regardless of what science or reason says.

Of course.

Naturally, if there were strong empirical evidence falsifying an essential Catholic dogma, then my accepting the implications of that evidence would mean that I would no longer be in communion with the Catholic Church.