Norway Officials Place Children Seized From Parents Over ‘Christian Indoctrination’ Up for Adoption

  • Thread starter Thread starter CopyBoy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CopyBoy

Guest
Officials in Norway have moved to place five children that were seized from their parents on charges that included “Christian radicalization and indoctrination” up for adoption, reports state.
Click to expand...
As previously reported, on Nov. 16 and 17, Norway’s child welfare services, the Barnevernet, seized Marius and Ruth Bodnariu’s two daughters, two sons and their baby, Ezekiel. The two eldest children were reportedly removed from school without their parents knowledge, and then Barnevarnet representatives arrived with police at the Bodnariu home, where welfare services seized the remaining children, minus the baby.
Click to expand...
The organization returned the following day and removed the infant as well after the family tried to resolve the matter after being arrested.
Click to expand...
christiannews.net/2016/01/01/norway-officials-place-children-seized-from-parents-over-christian-indoctrination-up-for-adoption/
 
I sometimes wonder when I see these articles on countries so quick to seize people’s children if they also forced parents to get sterilized. I mean, in this case, they took all the kids. If they see them as so unfit to be parents, one might expect that the next step would be sterilization so that child welfare will not have to be called again to that house in the future. Just wondering.
 
I think it is incredibly relevant Jhar because it shows the state is removing morality from the parents hand. If the state encourages promiscuous behavior and drug use it undermines parental authority. When the state see the parental right of authority as abuse and indoctrination then that is a serious problem ,It goes hand in hand.
The age of consent was only that low historically because people died early and married younger. They generally were not having sex just for entertainment as many do now.

Many bible scholars claim Mary was only 13 or 14 when she brought forth our Savior.
 
Is Christian indoctrination officially against the law in Norway, then?

That can’t be right. Were there any other charges?
 
LOL Jhar “too much cake”

I think there might be something else more nefarious afoot than just a social service agency run amok. It is possible that they may be running an illegal adoption agency for profit.They may have “buyers” for the children,Who knows. It could be a very lucrative business.
 
Yes,they probably wish to remove beautiful creative well adjusted children from loving homes and adopt them out to others who conform to the states agenda of eliminating religious freedom. It seems like a technique of instilling fear or submission in others perhaps?
People may be profiting monetarily from this especially if they do not see any inherent dignity in people and treat them as cattle and chattel.
 
redbetta said:
I sometimes wonder when I see these articles on countries so quick to seize people’s children if they also forced parents to get sterilized. I mean, in this case, they took all the kids. If they see them as so unfit to be parents, one might expect that the next step would be sterilization so that child welfare will not have to be called again to that house in the future. Just wondering.
Click to expand...
I’m not advocating a position on it, but I don’t see how sterilization would not be justified. What argument would one make that one is justified but not the other? To me it is just one of the many inconsistencies of the modern state.

One could even argue it is cruel not to sterilize. Not doing so would make every marital act an opportunity to have to carry and birth a child who will be stolen from you. One popular argument for abortion is that a mother shouldn’t be forced to bear a child from a rape or incestual act because of the trauma that could cause. Wouldn’t there be a trauma conceiving, carrying and birthing a child who will be taken from you?
 
exnihilo said:
I’m not advocating a position on it, but I don’t see how sterilization would not be justified. What argument would one make that one is justified but not the other? To me it is just one of the many inconsistencies of the modern state.

One could even argue it is cruel not to sterilize. Not doing so would make every marital act an opportunity to have to carry and birth a child who will be stolen from you. One popular argument for abortion is that a mother shouldn’t be forced to bear a child from a rape or incestual act because of the trauma that could cause. Wouldn’t there be a trauma conceiving, carrying and birthing a child who will be taken from you?
Click to expand...
Exni,I think they are implementing a technique of oppression and fear.They are using this family to intimidate others and to try to abolish religious freedom and in the process acquire human assets.
These children are very healthy looking and beautiful and would probably fetch a pretty penny on the black market. I cannot imagine the money that would be made by the state if they start removing Christian children and selling them(under the table of course) Next they may target Muslims or Buddhists.Recall how China targeted the falun gong and used them for their organs YUK.How evil a society we live in.
 
In other years, they may have been able to ask for asylum here but under the current administration it would never be granted. I believe that Germany too is harassing families that dare to home school their children rather then send them to state schools. And I don’t believe that the media here have been publicizing it or people would be enraged.

I can see this happening here as schools wil be forced to teach that SS marriages are normal, and avoid religion altogether unless it is confined to the study of Islam. Some of this is occurring now and parents are upset, but eventually everyone will be afraid to speak against it as they’ll be accused of being bigots. And if this trend continues, children may be taken away from their parents.
 
cjforJesus said:
This is a very interesting story because Norway is generally a very pagan and anti Christian country. The age of consent for sexual activityI think is 14 or 16! and drug use is rampant.

Praying for the children and parents.

Thanks for the article,Copy Boy.
Click to expand...
Here is a link to information about “age of consent” laws in North America:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America

In much of the U.S. and all of Canada the age of consent is 16. By the way, I find the age of consent situation in some Mexican states very disturbing. However, it doesn’t seem to me that there is any correlation between religious freedom and age of consent laws, and, in my humble opinion, it is not helpful to introduce hot button, sex-related issues into a discussion about an unrelated issue. That said, if I had my way, the age of consent would be 18 everywhere on the planet. Young girls need to be protected - even if it is from themselves.
 
HCTC said:
Here is a link to information about “age of consent” laws in North America:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America

In much of the U.S. and all of Canada the age of consent is 16. By the way, I find the age of consent situation in some Mexican states very disturbing. However, it doesn’t seem to me that there is any correlation between religious freedom and age of consent laws, and, in my humble opinion, it is not helpful to introduce hot button, sex-related issues into a discussion about an unrelated issue. That said, if I had my way, the age of consent would be 18 everywhere on the planet. Young girls need to be protected - even if it is from themselves.
Click to expand...
I think immorality and political corruption can be easily linked. It may not be as much a case of religious freedom than using it as an excuse to remove the kids.
 
HCTC said:
Here is a link to information about “age of consent” laws in North America:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America

In much of the U.S. and all of Canada the age of consent is 16. By the way, I find the age of consent situation in some Mexican states very disturbing. However, it doesn’t seem to me that there is any correlation between religious freedom and age of consent laws, and, in my humble opinion, it is not helpful to introduce hot button, sex-related issues into a discussion about an unrelated issue. That said, if I had my way, the age of consent would be 18 everywhere on the planet. Young girls need to be protected - even if it is from themselves.
Click to expand...
The more I read about this situation the more it appears to be a deliberate attempt to inflame and anger the public.
The government of Norway backs a state sponsored Protestant religion. 82% of the population lists it as their religion yet it is estimated that less than 5% actually practice it!
So a child welfare agency sees the Christian indoctrination of these children as something dangerous when it is the state sponsored religion?
The family is Pentecostal by the way but there is no mention of what “radical” sect they belong to. Something smells very fishy.
 
cjforJesus said:
This is a very interesting story because Norway is generally a very pagan and anti Christian country. The age of consent for sexual activityI think is 14 or 16! and drug use is rampant.

Praying for the children and parents.

Thanks for the article,Copy Boy.
Click to expand...
Oh dear Oh dear
 
redbetta said:
I sometimes wonder when I see these articles on countries so quick to seize people’s children if they also forced parents to get sterilized. I mean, in this case, they took all the kids. If they see them as so unfit to be parents, one might expect that the next step would be sterilization so that child welfare will not have to be called again to that house in the future. Just wondering.
Click to expand...
Sometimes I wonder too but not for long. Ireland couldn’t grab them fast enough and only a few years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top