In that case, I wish they’d just post both and make it clear which one is current and which one isn’t. I mean, you’d like to think the Vatican posts the currently definitive version.
OTOH, maybe it is not such a horrible thing that there is not an army of fussbudgets staffing the web site of the Holy See!

That’s how I look at it. I’m pretty sure there are much fewer Type A personalities in the Catholic Church in Europe than here in the U.S.
I take it as an opportunity for myself to grow in patience and be less uptight. I always like to have everything
right away (especially when it comes to Church documents

). But most of the time it is simply not necessary. The differences from the first edition of the CCC to the second are not earth-shattering, dogma-reversing changes.
I haven’t really compared and contrasted the editions of the GIRM yet. The only comparison I’ve seen made so far is with paragraph 160.
Old GIRM:
The norm for reception of Holy Communion in the dioceses of the United States is standing. Communicants should not be denied Holy Communion because they kneel. Rather, such instances should be addressed pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm.
New GIRM:
The norm established for the Dioceses of the United States of America is that Holy Communion is to be received standing, unless an individual member of the faithful wishes to receive Communion while kneeling (Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Instruction,
Redemptionis Sacramentum, March 25, 2004, no. 91).
But, while I find these things fascinating, I am not yet sufficiently deluded to think that 95% of my fellow Catholics feel the same way.
