Not open for discussion

[Sociallycal]

I do not want to raise any eyebrow, by jumping any conclusions.

Hence, i wish for your open mind to look at the following

Sequana and Lourdes

Guadalupe and Tonantzin

I got Fatima keywords too

 

[goout]

I do not want to raise any eyebrow, by jumping any conclusions.

Hence, i wish for your open mind to look at the following

Sequana and Lourdes

Guadalupe and Tonantzin

I got Fatima keywords too

Are you asserting that Marian apparitions are empty reprises of pagan traditions?
God is speaking to all peoples of all times. Distant pagan cultures perceived elements of revelation, imperfect and dim.
In Christ we have the fullness of revelation, and the Church’s approved apparitions will have the fullest possible sense of revelations that might be dimly perceived prior.

 

[Tis_Bearself]

Marian apparitions that are approved by the Church are approved private revelations. Catholics may choose to believe in them, but are not required to do so.

Where the Vatican has already approved a Marian apparition, such as Fatima, Lourdes and Guadalupe, there is nothing further to discuss. It’s approved. You are not required to believe in it. The Church has however spoken to the issue of approval and it is wrong to try to second guess the Church.