NOTICE: Stricter moderation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jo_Benedict
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Does this Stricter moderation cover what is in users signatures also?

As I have seen some that seem to promote SSPX and other non-Catholic traditional stuff.
It depends on the content. The mod staff doesn’t have time to look up the profiles of all members who use a particular forum and so relies on members to bring problematic content to our attention. Just keep in mind this guideline:
Jo Benedict:
Save filing complaints for serious, substantial breaches of CAF rules. Petty bickering should not inspire petty reporting. Abuse of the post-report system will make you as subject to mod discipline as anyone else.
In other words, please do not overload me with a bunch of profiles to review. But if there is seriously problematic content in a particular sig line, please let me know.
 
Does this Stricter moderation cover what is in users signatures also?

As I have seen some that seem to promote SSPX and other non-Catholic traditional stuff.
Is tradition excommunicated?

Funny how you see Catholics criticizing tradition one of the main things that used to distinguish us from the Protestants.:rolleyes:
 
Gosh…I’ve had to struggle my entire life just to be a good, ordinary Catholic. I can’t imagine how horribly I’d fail at trying to be a hardcore Trad.🤷
 
Gosh…I’ve had to struggle my entire life just to be a good, ordinary Catholic. I can’t imagine how horribly I’d fail at trying to be a hardcore Trad.🤷

Its not all that difficult. Prior generations upon generations upon generations, etc. were all Trad. The Church Herself was Trad.
 
Does this Stricter moderation cover what is in users signatures also?

As I have seen some that seem to promote SSPX and other non-Catholic traditional stuff.
And foolish me, I thought Traditionalists were Catholics. I’m glad that he moderators put up the new sticky. I may never have found the following from His Holiness Pope John Paul II

moreover, respect must everywhere be shown for the feelings of all those who are attached to the Latin liturgical tradition, by a wide and generous application of the directives already issued some time ago by the Apostolic See for the use of the Roman Missal according to the typical edition of 1962.(9)

We all know that many of the clergy paid no heed at all to the above and still don’t… And now we also know that many who are not Traditionally minded don’t seem to worry about it too much either.

Interesting.
 
My fellow “y’at”, we have hoped and prayed for some 40 years. Neither of us are “home” in the sense of where we grew up. My bishop (up river) merely “acknowledged” the Motu Proprio.

Our memories go back to St. Alphonsus Parish and our memories of New Orleans. I was at a conference this week on the east side of Mobile Bay. Couldn’t go to Mass on Sunday because of a lack of transportation (six miles). I did, however, watch the Solemn High Mass of the Holy Cross on EWTN.

Neither of us can change what we experienced as kids. I’d have to do some serious brushing up on the rubrics but I had no problem reciting the Mass or singing the plainsong in Latin. The last EF or TLM I went to was in the mid 70’s.

I’d like to respond to some of the comments on this thread. I grew up with the EF. I got my “big” missal when I was confirmed in March of "63 as a sixth grader. I was an altar boy before Vatican II and after Vatican II. I went to Catholic schools in New Orleans from primer to my senior year in high school.

I’ve sung in a reverent OF cathedral choir for over 18 years.

No, I don’t want to go back exclusively to the Church I knew as a kid. But I am happy that my kids got exposed to chant and sacred motets in our cathedral parish (It was a long haul but in the final analysis, we are not Anglicans…long story).

Palmas and I grew up in a very Catholic New Orleans. I know exactly what he is talking about. Like him, I have waited for some 40 years for the pendulum to swing in the opposite direction.

I didn’t need my Missal to follow along with the Solemn High Mass on EWTN. Like it or not, I am a “traditional” Roman Catholic. I cannot change who I am.
 
Is tradition excommunicated?

Funny how you see Catholics criticizing tradition one of the main things that used to distinguish us from the Protestants.:rolleyes:
People who are against the Catholic Church are protestants.
And foolish me, I thought Traditionalists were Catholics.
Not all “traditionalists” are Catholics. There are many schismatic groups who claim to be “traditionalist” but are not Catholic.

I am sorry that you two can not see this, but obviously that is recognized here at this forum or this stricter moderation would not be taking place.
 
People who are against the Catholic Church are protestants.

Not all “traditionalists” are Catholics. There are many schismatic groups who claim to be “traditionalist” but are not Catholic.

I am sorry that you two can not see this, but obviously that is recognized here at this forum or this stricter moderation would not be taking place.

Can you please point to the document/s where the Church Herself identifies which group/s that you claim-- are not Catholic. I am asking for documentation where Church has actually made this type of claim.
 
I was hoping for stricter moderation a long time ago when this forum was first launched. I can understand the spirit of tolerance of a wide range of views, but this particular topic does not lend itself to a loose structure. I think the CAF policy should be enforced tightly. I’ve seen too many people slip off into traditionalists schisms due to extreme rhetoric.

This is a very good step forward.
 
I would like to think that a new Catholic, a confused Catholic, and non-Catholics can come here and get correct information without being told that the Mass they regularly attend is invalid, illicit, inferior, etc. Catholic Answers is just that–a place to get ANSWERS. I find it quite upsetting to my faith that SSPX people regularly come onto this board and tell me stuff that is contrary to what my bishop and priests teach, but claim that their teaching is truly “Catholic.” This is the kind of thing that can cause a shaky person to leave the Church.

I applaud the strong stand that the moderators will be taking, and beg them to continue to make CAF a place where we can get correct answers to our queries.
Cat,

Do the bishops and priests that teach things contrary to the Catholic faith also bother you? Do you think they cause confusion to ordinary Catholics and new Catholics?

I ask because I’ve read probably 100+ of your posts and have never seen you speak to this issue.
 

Can you please point to the document/s where the Church Herself identifies which group/s that you claim-- are not Catholic. I am asking for documentation where Church has actually made this type of claim.
I do not believe that this thread is for this kind of discussion but I believe any group that claims there is no pope or claims their own pope are obviously outside of the Catholic Church through schism.

I find it strange that I am being attacked in such a manner for asking a simple question and that many assume I am against the traditional movement when I have said no such thing.

Thanks for the judging. 👍
 
Since the opening of the Traditional Catholicism forum, I, as a moderator, have tried to step in as little as possible, only intervening when necessary. My philosophy is that micromanaging conversations has a negative impact on a healthy sharing of diverse opinions.

Problem is, it hasn’t worked. Some have taken advantage of the light moderation to proselytize for various brands of radical Traditionalism that is not in keeping with mainstream Catholicism. On the other side, tender consciences have been scandalized.

So, here is the way it’s going to be for the foreseeable future:

1. Proselytism will not be tolerated. If you need a definition of what is considered proselytism, click here. Participants are solely responsible for knowing and following the rules of the forum before participation. Proselytism will be a one-strike rule. Violate it and you’re gone.

You are also responsible for knowing and following all of the rules of this forum. Read the stickies at the top of the forum if you need a refresher.

2. Any lack of cooperation with mod direction will not be tolerated and will also be subject to the one-strike rule. Violate it and you’re gone. Lack of cooperation includes public complaints about mod action and private verbal abuse of the moderator (including but not limited to insults, emotional manipulation, and questioning her competence and/or religious faith).

3. The moderator will make every effort to read new threads and respond quickly to complaints that are filed. Do not abuse this by increasing her workload through filing numerous petty complaints. Save filing complaints for serious, substantial breaches of CAF rules. Petty bickering should not inspire petty reporting. Abuse of the post-report system will make you as subject to mod discipline as anyone else.

4. All SSPX discussions are currently on probationary status. While I understand the importance of discussion of the SSPX in a Traditional Catholicism forum, those who participate in those discussions cannot seem to restrain themselves to charitable dialogue. If the situation does not improve – immediately – there will have to be at least a temporary ban on discussing the SSPX. If you want to be able to continue discussing this subject, do your part to improve the atmosphere of those discussions.

5. If you are struggling with temptations to radical Traditionalism, please understand that this forum may not be the right forum for you to participate in. CAF hosts many different forums, and you may find a better fit in one of them (e.g., Liturgy & Sacraments).

6. This thread will be left open for now to allow follow-up questions. Please do not view it as an opportunity to argue with these new guidelines or the necessity for them. Thank you.
…got my vote!👍
 
I do not believe that this thread is for this kind of discussion but I believe any group that claims there is no pope or claims their own pope are obviously outside of the Catholic Church through schism.

I find it strange that I am being attacked in such a manner for asking a simple question and that many assume I am against the traditional movement when I have said no such thing.

Thanks for the judging. 👍

I do not believe I did the judging. I only asked for documentation as to what the Church Herself says concerning Your claim as to what groups She considers to no longer be Catholic.
 
Cat,

Do the bishops and priests that teach things contrary to the Catholic faith also bother you? Do you think they cause confusion to ordinary Catholics and new Catholics?

I ask because I’ve read probably 100+ of your posts and have never seen you speak to this issue.
Thank you for reading my posts. I usually read yours as well (and your wife’s).

I have never seen Masses that are irreverent.

I have never seen priests that teach things contrary to the Catholic dogma, priests that avoid topics like artificial contraception and abortion, priests who rail against celibacy, priests who advocate women priests, priests who criticize tradition.

I have never seen a bishop who refuses to allow the Latin Mass.

I have never been in a Mass where the music is worldly, or in Masses that are inclusive to the point where they cannot be distinguished from Protestant worship services, or at Life Teen Masses that are abusive.

I have never known charismatic Catholics that are factious, etc.

I have never seen clowns or dancing in Mass.

I have never seen irreverence, abuse, or indifference towards Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament.

I HAVE seen Adoration offered 24/7 in our city, TLM offered daily in our city, Life Teen offered in our city (and growing by leaps and bounds!), Catholic schools that teach orthodox Catholic dogma, RCIA programs that truly disciple new Catholics, a two-year ministry formation program required by the bishop for all who are involved in teaching ministries in the parishes, “Why Catholic” Bible/catechism studies offered throughout the diocese, magnificent music from all the centuries of Catholic tradition in Mass, Bible studies and apologetics classes offered in many of the parishes, a SURPLUS of vocations in the diocese, and active involvement by Catholics in the prolife movement as well as in movements that help the poor and the disenfranchised.

So it is difficult for me to assess how the things you speak of upset or confuse the average lay person since I have never experienced anything but the best that the Catholic Church has to offer.

I’m kind of like Richie Rich here–I have no idea how the “lower half” lives.

However, in spite of living in the incredibly orthodox diocese that I described above, I have met plenty of Catholics (lay) in the diocese who are what I would describe as “carnal.”

They support liberal causes (women priests, marriage of priests, etc.), they join their voices and paychecks politically with those who support outright sin (abortion, homosexual marriage, etc.), they disrespect the Eucharist, they refuse to submit to the Pope and the Magisterium, they are hard-hearted, unrepentant, and openly sinful, and critical of Catholics who DO adhere to the orthodox Catholic Church.

So it seems to me that having an “orthodox” diocese and a conservative bishop is no guarantee that Catholics will remain close to the Church.

If someone gives in to temptation and practices deliberate sin, they will do so even if Pope Pius X is standing over them intoning in Latin.

And on the other side, if someone is trapped in a diocese where the things that many of you decry are practiced regularly (abuses, incorrect teachings, irreverence, etc.), I agree that it is possible that they will become confused, discouraged, and eventually fall away from the Church.

I think that more than likely, Catholics are likely to become confused when they look away from the Church to the “green grass” on the other side of the Christian block–the Protestant churches and fellowships where the music is fine, the fellowship is friendly, and it’s OK to use a condom and have sex more than a few times a month.

I agree that the answer to this sort of confusion and attrition of Catholics is better catechesis, however, there are times when catechesis is excellent and teaching is orthodox and non-confusing and Catholics still choose the easier road of Protestantism or outright un-churched life.

I think there are many things that can confuse a Catholic who does not stay close to Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, avail themselves of the Sacraments (especially Reconciliation), read the Scriptures and the Catechism, and attend Mass as often as possible, even a sub-par Mass. As long as Jesus is offered, Mass is worthwhile and efficacious for a person’s soul.

A Catholic who does these things may be upset by “confusing teachings,” either from groups like SSPX or from liberal priests, but they will NOT be led down the wrong path. Jesus promised that He will not lose any of His sheep.

But WE have to listen to and obey God

If you have read my posts, you will see that many times, I have said that rather than submitting to unorthodox teachings in the Catholic Church and allowing yourself to become whipped into lethargy and possibly even sucked into attending an organization that is questionable in the eyes of the Church, it would be better to move away to a different diocese.

Your very soul is at stake. People say they can’t move. This may be true in some situations, but I honestly think that many people COULD pull up stakes and immigrate to a city in a diocese like mine. I’m not saying it’s easy to leave kith and kin behind, quit a good job, sell a house (especially in todays market), uproot children, etc. But again–your SOULS are at stake! What is the worth of your soul? If you are really serious about ending abuses and irreverences to the point where you are willing to become part of a movement that is divisive (not necessarily truly schismatic, but certain factious, something that is utterly condemned by St. Paul in the Scriptures), then you should be willing to move. Action, not words.

If you aren’t willing to move or you truly can’t move, then FIND a way to deal with the abuses rather than abandoning the true Church of Jesus Christ for a factious group.
 
I would like to add one more point to my long post above.

I think that ex-Protestants are more likely to be upset and discouraged by “confusing” teachings.

We have come from a background in which confusion and unorthodoxy are dealt with by “leaving.”

Most of us have been involved in church splits. Almost all of us have left churches because of “unBiblical teaching or practices.” Many of us have been part of church planting efforts, in which we plant a new church even when there are perfectly good churches of the same denomination the same neighborhood where we are planting our church!

We have seen firsthand the heartbreak and consequences of people trying to decide for themselves what is “Scriptural.”

We THOUGHT the Catholic Church was the Refuge for Christians weary of being tossed and turned by every new bandwagon.

So when we see factions and groups that appear to divide the Holy Mother Church, we are swept back into that whirlpool that we USED to be part of, and we don’t like it. It frightens us.

A person who has had a near-drowning experience will be very careful around water, and in many cases will avoid water entirely.

I believe that in the same way, an ex-Protestant or a seeking Protestant who senses that the Catholic Church isn’t truly ONE will become much more discouraged and despairing than the average Catholic who has studied 2000 years of Church history and knows that upheavals occur all the time and are nothing to worry about.

AND–I believe that those who cause an ex-Protestant or seeking Protestant to walk away from the Catholic Church WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE for the soul of that pilgrim.

Thus, I once again applaud the actions of the Moderators. There are some issues that are simply too dangerous to discuss openly. Find an intimate group of friends that you trust with your very life, and discuss these issues with THEM. Monitor everyone in the group to make sure that no one is being harmed in their soul by the discussions. And SNATCH those who start to fall away BACK to the bosom of the Church.

But to hold these types of dangerous discussions unchecked and unmonitored in a Open Forum where all types of people can read them is asking for eternal trouble. The Moderators are to be praised for choosing to closely moderate these dangerous discussions. The souls of Protestants are worth more than “the freedom to exchange controversial conversation.”
 

I do not believe I did the judging. I only asked for documentation as to what the Church Herself says concerning Your claim as to what groups She considers to no longer be Catholic.
Read what I posted again please.

No where did I make any claims about any groups. I just pointed out the simple fact that, as did the Moderator of this forum, that there are schismatic traditional groups out there.

I need not supply any documentation as I have made no statements as to which groups are such and which are not.
 
So when we see factions and groups that appear to divide the Holy Mother Church, we are swept back into that whirlpool that we USED to be part of, and we don’t like it. It frightens us.
Dear Cat,

I believe that it is very very important to offer you sincere and urgent apologies for the concern and confusion raised in the depths of your soul by such conversations. The point should be made, though, that that which frightens and saddens you on one side of the issue, also frightens and saddens us on the other side of the issue.

However, it is equally important not to ignore issues in the Church. If the issue of the SSPX were as like the sedevacantists, it would be a dead issue…there exists a true break from the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

I submit to you that this is not the case in regards to the SSPX. The Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI regards the Society as *an internal * matter of reconciliation within the Church. Cardinal Hoyos has permitted those who have no Diocesan alternatives to assist at their Masses, as long as such assistance is based on sincere Love for the Traditional Mass and the Traditional Teachings of the Church. The evidence suggests that, although in a highly irregular status, the Society of St. Pius X is a Catholic group.

Unless or until the Holy Father deems the Society’s status differently, I’m not sure how wise it would be to ignore the situation and hope it will ‘go away.’ Prayer for a final resolution of the issue is very much a part of my daily prayers. I will remain obedient to the Holy Father.

It must be stressed however, that one should seek out in earnest a Traditional Mass and Teachings under the auspices of one’s Bishop and Diocese. Although they are not very common, and in some places unfortunately non-existent, which is contrary to the generosity of availability that Pope Benedict has asked of his Bishops, one ought to do one’s best to petition one’s Diocese.

Please accept my sincere apologies for having caused you any stress or crises of Faith. I am sure that those of Good Will on both sides of the issue will pray for your edification.

Please forgive me, Cat.
 
Prayer for a final resolution of the issue is very much a part of my daily prayers. I will remain obedient to the Holy Father. .
This one statement is a reflection of how we should all feel and act. I am with you on this 1000%.
Prayers & blessings
Deacon Ed B
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top