QUOTE=Phemie;6424953]I brought that up in a diocesan meeting where they were discussing implementing set-ups that would never allow the priest & penitent to be invisible.
The first reaction I got, from a pastor, was total surprise that anyone would want to be anonymous: “How do you give pastoral counsel if you don’t know who you are speaking with?”
Unbelivable!!! Why on earth would the priest need to know who the “confessee” is to discuss right & wrong…to say “this is a particularly heinous sin & here’s some advice on how to avoid it”. Or, “What you’ve described is not a sin, but a habit that should be looked at & prayed about”.
The next, from the bishop, was that anonymity was unimportant when put against the safety of penitents.
What I’ve come to understand is that, nowadays, the insurance company even dictates how one will confess – it’s all about cover your a** to reduce any liability.
That is pathetic. What our hierarchy should be looking at, right now, is WHY so few partake in a Sacrament that Christ, Himself, took such care to create. He said to His apostles, "What sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven; and what sins you shall retain, they are retained.
To the OP., the reconciliation rooms have been around since the 70’s & they are a total flop!! When one examines his/her conscience & makes the emotional effort to partake in the Sacrament of Confession…it is hard, it is sometimes painful & it is a PRIVATE thing that concerns the penitent, the priest & God.
However, in order to change things like this, the hierarchy in the Church in the US. is going to have to admit that so many of their “experiments” that followed the council…have created havoc within Christ’s Church. Some have already done this…others are going to hang onto these failed innovations until their dying day. However, these…who cannot seem to say, “I was wrong” are getting very close to retirement. Hang in there, “The times they are a-changing.”
