Notre Dame Asked to Rescind Speaking Invitation to President Obama

  • Thread starter Thread starter juliee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

juliee

Guest
South Bend, IN – That the University of Notre Dame has extended an invitation to pro-abortion President Barack Obama to give its commencement address to and to receive an honorary degree has sparked outrage. Obama is slated to speak at Notre Dame’s commencement on May 17.

Hundreds of thousands of pro-life advocates have contacted Notre Dame officials expressing their disappointment and pro-life groups have condemned its decision, but one group is going further.

The National Right to Life Committee has asked the Catholic college to rescind the invitation.

See LifeNews.com/state3976.html
 
Why am I not surprised that Notre Dame President Jenkins has released a statement that there is no way he will consider rescinding the invitation to our most pro-abortion…pro-death President.

The CCC has a possible answer for N.D’s actions:***1793. If **- on the contrary - the ignorance is invincible, or the moral subject is not responsible for his erroneous judgment, the evil committed by the person cannot be imputed to him. It remains no less an evil, a privation, a disorder. One must therefore work to correct the errors of moral conscience.

*I would say what Notre Dame suffers from…more precisely…is invincible pride…(not invincible ignorance…they are not ignorant of what they are doing…just like Speaker Pelosi, Vice Pres. Biden et.al.)…Notre Dame is (and has been for many, many years) ***“a legend in their own mind!”

Even after the Pope(Vicar of Christ on Earth–Saint Peter)* and the Successors to the Apostles, the Bishops, have directed Catholic universities/colleges that they must not invite/give prominent platforms to people who are directly opposed Catholic Doctrine…and teachings on faith and morals…good old N.D. does it anyway. I wonder what they think Our Lord Jesus would say…actually has said…actually is saying:
Luke 10:16 (English Standard Version)

[Jesus sends the 72 disciples out]
  1. “The one who hears you hears me, and the one who rejects you rejects me, and the one who rejects me rejects him who sent me.”
Knowing that N.D. suffers from “invincible pride”…they would probably simply respond [to paraphrase Professor Peter Kreeft, Boston College] to Our Lord Jesus and Saint Peter:
**“Ah…excuse me Jesus…but I believe that you are sitting on my throne…!” **…or…

"Ah…excuse me Saint Peter (Pope B-XVI)…but I believe that you are sitting in my Chair!"
God bless them and help them…do not let them lead your flock astray…Lord hear our prayer!

****Pax Christi
 
I think that the victory will come when the President has to decline the invitation due to “scheduling conflicts” if of course the public outcry is large enough on this story. I don’t think that the University will rescind its invitation to the President even with the Bishop declining to attend.

Watch out for the “scheduling conflict” or “a matter of great importance” that will force the President to be somewhere else that day.
 
We were involved in a similiar situation when Pres. Bush was the commencement speaker at my daughter’s graduation (Calvin College) a few years ago.

There was a huge backlash and protest against this from many in the Calvin College community, as many of the students and faculty believed that Pres. Bush was a warmonger (as if the Calvinists have been conscientious objectors throughout history–yeah, sure).

We were and still are admirers of Pres. Bush, and felt that no matter how much people disagreed with him, they should respect the Office of President of the United States, just as we ask visitors to the Catholic Church to at least show respect for Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament even if they personally believe it’s just a wafer of bread.

However, the Calvin situation was quite different than the Notre Dame situation, because war is not considered a “grave sin” by the Reformed Churches (the Calvinists do not recognize the idea of “grave sins,” because they believe in predestination, which means that any sin is forgiven automatically for those who are “predestined” to go to heaven), whereas abortion and embryonic stem cell research (genocide) ARE grave sins according the Catholic Church. It is an affront and an outrage for a large, publicly-known institution of the Catholic Church to give a public forum to a person who is a known proponent of abomination.

Anyway, I’m wondering what form the protests on Graduation Day will take. Does anyone know?

At Calvin, it came down to students and faculty wearing buttons that said, “God is not a Republican.”

It’s a delicate situation. It’s not President Obama’s day, or “Pro-Life Day,” but it’s Graduation Day, and no matter what form the protest takes, the graduates should be recognized and honored.

But I can’t see just sitting back silently and allowing this to happen. It gives assent, and I see that as chicken-hearted and ball-less.

I would like to think that there will be a bit more than buttons at the Notre Dame graduation. But I’m not sure what’s appropriate. It would be a huge insult to the Office of President of the United States for students, faculty, and parents to turn their backs on the President during his speech, but that’s what I would be tempted to do.

I’m wondering if it would be appropriate for pro-life students, faculty, and parents to keep their heads obviously bowed and pray the Rosary silently during the President’s speech, or possibly even kneel throughout the speech (I would have to bring knee-pads!) To me, that would express our grief and outrage over his pro-abortion agenda without actually insulting the Office of the President.

Another option would be to not applaud for the President either when he is introduced, or certainly after his speech. To me, that would not be insulting to the Office, but it would express our disdain for his viewpoints.

Also, will there be any written protest in the form of signs, messages written on mortarboards, leaflets, etc? Would this be considered inappropriate for the occasion and insulting to the graduates?

And how about the vocal and visual protests–students and others who are not graduating standing outside the graduation venue and carrying signs, chanting slogans, and doing some of the effective theatrics, e.g., carrying a tiny coffin, or displaying the models of the infant at various stages of pregnancy?

It’s a little worrisome to me as a parent of a student (grad school) at St. Louis University, another Jesuit school. I’m afraid we could find ourselves in the same boat next year. I am wondering if perhaps I (and other SLU parents) would be wise to start writing letters now to ask the SLU officials to please not invite pro-choice speakers to daughter’s graduation. When she graduated with the Bachelor’s Degree a few years ago, the speaker was Joe Buck, who was pretty cool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top