Now You Can Be Sued For Being Catholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeedImprovement
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
(* too late to edit post above) -To be a little more precise , the exact words of cardinal Pell
40.png
John21652:
“Let us spell this out,” said the Cardinal. “The clear meaning of these words is that religious freedom is not a human right and may not be compatible with human rights.”
 
(* too late to edit post above) -To be a little more precise , the exact words of cardinal Pell
If we do not learn the lessons of history ,then we are destined to repeat them again.

Within our parents time, the German Nation under Hitler, issued laws that clearly dictated against the religious freedom of it’s citizens.Blessed Cardinal von Galen gave out priciples to his flock to choose their religious beliefs over those issued by the Government.Here is an exert of what he writes in his pasteral letter on 6th.July 1941----

“–there are sacred obligations of conscience from which **no one **has the power to release us and which we must fulfil even if it costs us our lives.Never under any circumstances may a human being kill an innocent person apart from war and legitimate self-defense.”

he wrote again in the same letter–

“Woe to mankind,woe to our German nation if God’s Holy Commandment “Thou shalt not kill” which God proclaimed on Mount Sinai amidst thunder and lightning,which God our Creator inscribed in the concience of mankind from the beginning,is not only broken,but if this transgression is actually tolerated and permitted to go unpunished”

Now to apply these principles to this thread----woe to America,Canada,U.K.—every single country–including my Aussie land that brings in human laws that override The Ten Commandments;whether it be regarding same sex marriage/adoption,abortion ,euthanasia etc.As Our Lord tells us–Beware of men----they will put you to death and will think they are doing good(a human “right”?)—“but do not fear
I have overcome the world”(Jesus)

Blessed Cardinal Clemens von Galen,pray for us and to help us to obey what is just in God’s Sight ,regardless of the cost to us. Amen
 
If we do not learn the lessons of history ,then we are destined to repeat them again.

Within our parents time, the German Nation under Hitler, issued laws that clearly dictated against the religious freedom of it’s citizens.Blessed Cardinal von Galen gave out priciples to his flock to choose their religious beliefs over those issued by the Government.Here is an exert of what he writes in his pasteral letter on 6th.July 1941----

“–there are sacred obligations of conscience from which **no one **has the power to release us and which we must fulfil even if it costs us our lives.Never under any circumstances may a human being kill an innocent person apart from war and legitimate self-defense.”

he wrote again in the same letter–

“Woe to mankind,woe to our German nation if God’s Holy Commandment “Thou shalt not kill” which God proclaimed on Mount Sinai amidst thunder and lightning,which God our Creator inscribed in the concience of mankind from the beginning,is not only broken,but if this transgression is actually tolerated and permitted to go unpunished”

Now to apply these principles to this thread----woe to America,Canada,U.K.—every single country–including my Aussie land that brings in human laws that override The Ten Commandments;whether it be regarding same sex marriage/adoption,abortion ,euthanasia etc.As Our Lord tells us–Beware of men----they will put you to death and will think they are doing good(a human “right”?)—“but do not fear
I have overcome the world”(Jesus)

Blessed Cardinal Clemens von Galen,pray for us and to help us to obey what is just in God’s Sight ,regardless of the cost to us. Amen
If one wants to heed the lessons of history, I suggest they obtain a book called Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin, written by Yale Historian Timothy Snyder.

The book details the atrocities committed by both Stalin’s Marxists and Hitlers Nazis in that part of Europe consisting of western Poland and easter Ukraine. The breakdown of an objective morality, replaced by a moral relativism as dictated by either marxism or Nazism resulted in the mass murder of millions of Polish and Ukrainians by starvation, shooting and gassing. We in the west are very used to reading and hearing of accounts of WW II as fought on the western theartres of war. This book details what went on in those areas of Europe which were locked away from western eyes immediately after the conclusion of the war. In horrific detail Snyder shows just how the moral relativism as dictated by either the Nazis or Marxists allowed what had once been a common morality to be subsumed by the expedient. In other words, laws written by men lead to the deaths of millions and all done in the name of whoever was in control of those lands at the time. Both marxism and nazism were Godless philosophies. The arrogance of man trumped objective morality and lead to the cult of the dictator. And why not? For the vacuum created by the trampling of “…the sacred obligations of conscience…”, as quoted by Karoleck, can and did lead to the introduction of a ‘morality’ based on the whims and desires of dictattors supported by a population lead away from those “…sacred obligations of conscience…”. Both Stalin and Hitler changed their ‘morality’ as the state of war changed and the supporters of those regimes went along for the ride. The consequences were appalling.

It might mean little to many people that a nation can show tolerance to minority groups such as those who crave the right to abortion, or the right to ‘marry’ a same sex partner, or the right to force a priest to perform a ceremony that is against the belief system of a Church, but if allowed to continue, it will inevitable lead to the suspension of the “…sacred obligations of conscience…” on a scale similar to that which occured in eastern Europe. History is full of similar examples.
 
When England’s Sexual Orientation Regulations of the Equality Act, installed under Tony Blair’s Labour government were passed , the first casualty was Catholic adoption agencies.

Why ?

Because they refused to admit homosexual partners as prospective adoptees (and they are right in doing so ). Catholic social workers in this domain were either forced to comply or lost their jobs … Hardly sounds like "equality" , you have to admit … :dts:

( for anyone just checking in to the thread now, the links to the stories substantiating the aforementioed facts are in some of the previous posts) .

The Reverend Nick Donnelly, deacon, who appears to be more tuned in to some of these more recent "lessons of history" , confirms it in response to Tory MP urges Cameron to crack down on churches that refuse to hold same-sex ceremonies
, when he says :
The CATHOLIC HERALD;UK:
The Rev Nick Donnelly, a Catholic deacon from Lancaster, said on his Protect the Pope blog that the MP’s demands revealed that the churches “have every reason to fear that the next phase of the campaign to establish pseudo-gay marriages will be to coerce them to accept homosexuals or be banned from holding marriages”.

He said: “They’ve banned the Catholic Church from placing children for adoption, now the stage is being set to ban us from holding marriages.”
So not only social workers, but, even more tragically, the children, have become victims of the gay militants’ and lobbyists’ assault on marriage and the family.

If any conscientious Catholics/Christians are not familiar with this next term , might I suggest that you look up several definitions of the word " indoctrination " ? There is a forced gay indoctrination of our children taking place in the world now . We should, at the very least, be aware of it so that, at the very least, we may pray for it to fail and or cease.

History has it’s lessons to be learned indeed , but, according to the *forcing of gay indoctrination of our children upon us *, so also it would seem do maths, geography and science …

‘Gay lessons’ in maths, geography and science

Children as young as four years old are being indoctrinated . What on earth does a child of 4 possibly need to know about gay, lesbian, transgendered or bisexuals ! ?

The answer is nothing ; absolutely nothing !

The *insidious snake * raises its head. (Prayer just might help us crush that head).

Blindness and tolerance are not synonymous guys… Let’s get it right.
 
*** PLEASE NOTE :**

The link in post # 22 to the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute’s October 2010 article is no longer functional due to recent changes made to their website. The article can now be accessed by clicking on Countries Slam Attempts to Create New “Right” to Sexual Education at UN .

As mentioned in post 22 , please be sure to click on the “ controversial UNESCO guidelines ” link in the article (3rd paragraph) to get a better overall view of what’s going on.
 
It now appears that, again, due to changes in the **Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute’s ** website, the link to the “ controversial UNESCO guidelines ” referenced in the previous post, no longer appears to be active.

A brief on the subject can be read here , or the article in its entirety may be read at UN Agency Promotes Sex Ed From Birth .
 
I think that the title of this thread by NeedsImprovement is the correct one.For those who live in an openly oppresive country such as China—well, the Goverment simply jails anyone who shows any moral leadership;that is why at anyone time there are two or three Bishops who are in prison.**NeedsImprovement ** is right about the need of prayer(and Penance) at this time

But the attacks on our western democratic countries by some governments ,is to pass laws that will uphold evil.For instance in Aussie land where John lives,The Victorian Government passed a law refusing a doctors’ right of concience in regard to a conscientious objection to abortion.This in turn,the refusal of doctor’s right of conscience(that **John ** warns about)has paved the way for compulsory participation in other processes e.g.euthanasia;physician assisted suiside.

As yet,this Victorian Government has not prosecuted any doctor ,so this law is in place but not enforced.But I suspect that before to long, this law will be tested when a woman sues a doctor who refused a woman’s request for him to kill her unborn baby.This will be the same for those priests who refuse to perform a same sex marriaqe request;or a teacher who refuses to teach (indoctrinate–as NeedsImprovement rightly put it) that a same sex lifestyle is good;or a catholic person working for an adoption agency refusing a same sex “couple” to adopt a child.The laws are in place to uphold evil–all it needs are test cases–which once won, will precipitate the flood gates of the persecution of catholics and persons of good will.

So the Law is turning good into evil & evil into good.I came across this passage of what the Roman proconsul Galerius Maximus said at the trial of St.Cyprian(Acta 3-6)

“You have lived in an irreligious manner for a long time now and have gathered about you a large congregation of criminals and unbelievers.You have shown yourself hostile to the gods of Rome and the rites by which they are worshipped.The pious and sacred emperors Valerian and his son,Gallienus,and the right noble Caesar,Valerian,have been unable to recall you to the practise of the official religion.Furthermore you are the intigator of abominations,a veritable standard-bearer for criminals and as such you have been brought before me.Your death will be an example to those whom you have gathered into your criminal conspiracy.Your blood will uphold the law.It is our decision that Thascius Cyprian be put to death by the sword” St Cyprian relied “Thanks be to God”

We have not come to this stage yet; but those who oppose same sex “marriage” ,same sex adoption of childrenand abortion are being attacked as being the “bad guys” and sometimes the worst offenders are "catholics"in the political/media arena ,being the worst offenders.Their line is “I am a catholic ;but I do not agree with the churches’ unjust stand on this–or this–Jesus preached only love”----ye sure!!-----(If you love Me–keep my Commandments)
 
I

… We have not come to this stage yet; but those who oppose same sex “marriage” ,same sex adoption of childrenand abortion are being attacked as being the “bad guys” and sometimes the worst offenders are "catholics"in the political/media arena ,being the worst offenders.Their line is “I am a catholic ;but I do not agree with the churches’ unjust stand on this–or this–Jesus preached only love”----ye sure!!-----(If you love Me–keep my Commandments)
The judges and the poiticians … 🤷

Somewhere along the line, as Karoleck hints, we must’ve stopped praying and doing penance (or little renouncements or fasting). Prayer and fasting can suspend the laws of nature, call down God’s grace and (👍) cast out demons :

Matt 17 :18-20 [DRV]

Then came the disciples to Jesus secretly, and said: Why could not we cast him out? Jesus said to them: Because of your unbelief. For, amen I say to you, if you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you shall say to this mountain, Remove from hence hither, and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible to you. But this kind is not cast out but by prayer and fasting.

I should think the Rosary would be a most effective weapon against this gay militant/lobbyist attack on marriage and the family. It’s always the right time to pray.

A variant of the “I am a catholic ;but I do not agree with the churches’ unjust stand on this–or this-" cop-out which has been repeated by various political leaders up here is: " Well, I can’t my personal beliefs interfere with my running of the country .”

Riiiight ! And where do you think your personal sense of conviction comes from … ? Most people who voted for you probably thought you were principled .
 
Examples/evidence of this forced indoctrination of children with the gay agenda abound . Perhaps we could have a look at this informative article to begin ; several of its excerpts appear below (bolds mine):

Judge orders ‘gay’ agenda taught to Christian children
WorldNetDaily:
… David and Tonia Parker and Joseph and Robin Wirthlin, who have children of school age in Lexington, Mass., brought the lawsuit. They alleged district officials and staff at Estabrook Elementary School violated state law and civil rights by indoctrinating their children about a lifestyle they, as Christians, teach is immoral.
“Wolf’s ruling is every parent’s nightmare. It goes to extraordinary lengths to legitimize and reinforce the ‘right’ (and even the duty) of schools to normalize homosexual behavior to even the youngest of children,” said a statement from the pro-family group Mass Resistance.
It also is making available background information about the lengthy dispute.
"In the ruling, Wolf makes the absurd claim that normalizing homosexuality to young children is ‘reasonably related to the goals of preparing students to become engaged and productive citizens in our democracy.’ According to Wolf, this means teaching ‘diversity’ which includes ‘differences in sexual orientation.’ …

… “As the Lexington schools themselves are arguing, the state’s right to force pro-homosexuality indoctrination on other people’s children arises directly from former Gov. Mitt Romney’s nakedly false and unconstitutional declaration that homosexual marriage is now legal.”
Haskins said when the Massachusetts state Supreme Court demanded homosexual marriages in the state, it didn’t have the constitutional or legal authority to order the governor to act or to order the Legislature to make any changes, and the creation of same-sex marriages in Massachusetts actually was accomplished by executive order from Romney .
 
The forced indoctrination of children with homosexual agenda in our elementary schools is not something totally new . This erosive process has been going on for some time now.

From Real Women of Canada, REALity ,
PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE THE NEXT BATTLEGROUND OVER HOMOSEXUALITY
(highlights mine) :

" In 1997 a homosexual kindergarten teacher, James Chamberlain, brought a legal action against the Surrey BC School Board for refusing the use of three pro-homosexual books in kindergarten and Grade 1. Under the BC Schools Act, the Minister of Education approves the basic educational resource material, but confers on local boards the authority to approve supplementary resource material. It took years for the case to wind its way to the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada, in a decision handed down in December 2002, read the words “tolerance” and “diversity” into the BC Schools Act even though these words were not mentioned in the Act at all. The court then held that “tolerance” (meaning support for homosexual education) is always age appropriate. The court further held that although the board must consider the religious views of parents, books cannot be banned on religious grounds. The court then required that the Surrey School Board review again the disputed books but refrain this time from using religion as a criterion. The court also ordered the school board to pay Chamberlain’s legal costs, which amounted to approximately $500,000.00. The school board duly reviewed the questionable books again, but, found them unacceptable on grounds other than religion, such as poor grammar, inappropriate contents, scope and depth. Although the Board rejected the use of these particular books in the Surrey Schools, it did instruct the Superintendent to find more appropriate books to deal with “different family structures” (See REALity January/February 2004, p.1), as instructed by the appointed Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada.
Since this was a decision by the highest court in the country, the Supreme Court of Canada, it applies to all of Canada, with the result that all School Acts must be interpreted to include “tolerance” toward homosexuality.

The Toronto Board has a budget of $2.2 billion this year, which is $217 million more than last year even though enrollment in the Toronto District School Board has dropped by approximately 20,000 students. Part of this money is now being used for the open promotion of homosexuality. According to an internal staff newsletter from a Toronto school board junior middle school, the trustees used taxpayers’ dollars to pay for a bus for the 2005 Gay Pride parade for staff and students. The Toronto District School Board also decided that it will not let parents know what or when their children will be taught about gays or lesbians. In short, the board decided that the parents should have no say over their children’s education on the homosexual issue. This is outrageous. It is a deliberate attempt to programme children on an ideological/political issue. In no way can this provision of homosexual propaganda be construed as “education”. The disregard of parental rights is part of a growing trend in the public education system. It also proves that the Trustees are willing to misrepresent the interests of parents on these matters. "
 
In case some of us may not have picked up on it yet,p lease note that , in addition to the children becoming tragic victims , the homosexual agenda is continuing to abrogate/abolish/nuke (call it what you will) the sacred right of parents concerning each one of their children’s education.

… Another article from as early as the year 2002 :

From Critics Slam ‘Gay Agenda’ in Public Schools (highlights mine)

" …But Jesse is just one of the more outrageous examples of the “gay agenda” infiltrating the public school systems across the country today, according to a group gathered at a Washington seminar on Monday.

Standing before a picture of the be-skirted Jesse, Robert H. Knight, director of the Culture and Family Institute, said parents are not being told the truth about what their young children learn in school today. “If most parents understood the depth of the homosexual agenda in the schools,” he argued, "there would be a revolution."

Knight joined representatives of other groups in denouncing what they called a massive effort on the part of groups like the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) to promote the homosexual lifestyle, **using “diversity,” safety and anti-discrimination programs as a stalking horse.

“They are getting in and out before parents even know what’s going on,” said Peter LaBarbera, an analyst for the Culture and Family Institute. "What they are doing to kids is manipulating them … "**
 
Heavy reading indeed, yet, we mustn’t remain ignorant .

The purpose of presenting these examples is to indicate very clearly (to those of us interested in reading about it ) the damage currently being wreaked at an international level upon the family and society, by the forced indoctrination of children with the homosexual agenda. It should serve to weed out any unsubstantiated naysayers too. However, before proceeding to any more examples, it probably wouldn’t hurt us to attempt one or two smiling exercises. This way we should be able to ward off any of perma-frown’s potential threats/effects .

As serious as things might get , **we must never let anyone take away our faith. Faith is our Anchor. Additionally, it is in our best interests not to let anyone take away any of our joy either **– no matter how dire a situation may look. If we have joy, we can usually find courage. If we have courage, we usually continue to pray. The long and short of it : Hold on to your sense of humour.

Although the quality of mirth is somewhat hidden in the Gospels (to protect against, one suspects, laying them open to blatant mockery ) mirth shone forth in certain Saints. St Augustine said , “the hippopotamus is proof that God has a sense of humour.”

Please note that we aren’t turning this into a joke thread or clubhouse thread at all. But it can be a strain emotionally reading the type of things exposed in the previous posts. So let’s pause a moment and consider parts of our faith as expressed through the eyes of some of our brothers who refused to let their joy be taken away :

St. Lawrence , during his martyrdom , never lost his joy. If anything, it appears to have increased :

The Saint was tied on top of an iron grill over a slow fire that roasted his flesh little by little, but Lawrence was burning with so much love of God that he almost did not feel the flames. In fact, God gave him so much strength and joy that he even joked. “Turn me over,” he said to the judge. “I’m done on this side!” And just before he died, he said, “It’s cooked enough now.”

Another of our elder brothers, most endeared to this thread - His Emminence George Cardinal Pell gives evidence in some of his more recent quotes that no one is going to be taking away his joy anytime soon either. Yet he has always remained firm, staunch and outspoken while proclaiming the truth on this thread’s topic.

In one article the Daily Telegraph says of him :

Pell says same-sex marriage - he doesn’t use the word “gay”, because he says it’s a word that has been colonised by one group and that “homosexuals are as miserable as the rest of us.”

That same article continues:

To those who question how a celibate priest could possibly advise on sexual matters, Pell replies: “I wasn’t born under a cabbage leaf. I’ve mixed widely in a whole variety of situations. Over those years, I’ve heard many confessions. Many people have come to talk about this or that.”

One more from Cardinal Pell - quoted from while he was attending World Youth Day in Madrid :

The cardinal spoke from the pulpit at Catedral de Santa Maris Magdalena, Getafe. When His Eminence was introduced to the congregation, it was to a standing ovation sparked by words:

"Young people are in the Church to set it on fire. Old people are there to make sure that it does not burn down."

🙂
 
(Highlights mine)

“Boy, girl or both?” - Oakland elementary school teaches pupils there are more than two genders
California Catholic Daily ; May 23:
Today and tomorrow, Redwood Heights Elementary School in Oakland will be teaching children from kindergarten through fifth grade that there are more than two genders, Pacific Justice Institute reports.

In a press release, Pacific Justice Institute provided the following details:

The two days calendared for this are entitled “Gender Spectrum Diversity Training.” In documents released by the school, students will be taught that “gender is not inherently nor solely connected to one’s physical anatomy.” Further, gender is a “complex interrelationship between (physical traits) and one’s internal sense of self as male, female, both or neither as well as one’s outward presentations and behaviors related to that perception.”

Another document from the school advises parents: “When you discuss gender with your child, you may hear them exploring where they fit on the gender spectrum and why.” …

… “This instruction does not represent the values of the majority of families in Oakland,” said attorney Kevin Snider of the Pacific Justice Institute. PJI has been providing legal counsel to parents in the Oakland Unified School District on this matter. “Though to many this may seem extreme, based upon some of the bills now pending in the Capitol such as SB 48, this will be the new normal in California’s K-12 public schools,” Snider continued.
At this point, it is not known if this is the only campus in the Oakland Unified School District that offers gender diversity training for children.

**“Unfortunately, many parents in the school are unaware that this is being taught,” **said the news release …
 
(Highlight mine)

[ Homosexual Activists Exploit Oak Park’s Beye Elementary School (http://www.illinoisfamily.org/news/contentview.asp?c=34699)
  • Several more words/terms which have been taken hostage and are wielded by the homosexual activists: ** diversity **, and ** family diversity ** .
Illinois Family Institute ; 1/14/2010:
… “Diversity” simply means difference. There is nothing inherently positive about “diversity.” “Family Diversity” is a term that obscures the politically incorrect truth that not all family structures are worthy of appreciation or respect. Some differences are good, some differences are bad, and some are neutral. The forms of diversity of which Ms. Sullivan is enamored are, in the view of many people, profoundly wrong; and public schools have no right to use school hours, school resources, and public money to affirm Ms. Sullivan’s unproven, divisive theories to children. The administration has no right to impose these unproven, divisive, and often religious beliefs, on teachers through Institute Day presentations or any other professional development workshops that focus on “anti-bullying” or “diversity.” And administrators have no right to expect or compel teachers to share Sullivan’s subversive ideas with young children, many of whose parents have political, philosophical, moral, or religious beliefs that conflict with them. …

… Elementary schools should not in any context introduce homosexuality or Gender Identity Disorder to children. I would argue that schools that affirm either implicitly or explicitly the following ideas are engaging in irresponsible, unethical, presumptuous, and perhaps unconstitutional moral indoctrination:
  • The theory that homosexuality is ontologically equivalent to skin-color or race
  • The theory that homosexuality is morally equivalent to heterosexuality
  • The theory that families led by homosexuals are morally equivalent to families led by heterosexuals
  • The idea that moral disapproval of homosexuality constitutes ignorance, bias, prejudice, hatred, bullying, or harassment
  • The idea that expressions of moral disapproval of homosexuality should be prohibited
Since many who affirm homosexuality attend churches that embrace “gay theology,” I would argue that the charge so often leveled at conservative people of faith should be extended to liberal people of faith, which is that schools that affirm homosexuality violate the separation of church and state by imposing the religious views of some on all children.

And if public schools, either implicitly or explicitly, convey the idea that disapproval of homosexuality is wrong or harmful, I would argue that they are coming dangerously close to violating the separation of church and state, in that many Muslims, Jews, Catholics, and Protestants believe that homosexuality is wrong and harmful. When schools teach, either implicitly or explicitly, the unprovable belief that homosexuality is moral or that disapproval of homosexuality is immoral, they are teaching many children that their religious beliefs are wrong …
 
There has already been a thread started on this next case , but it’s still worth a look here too . For one thing , we can avoid a lot of the naysayers and instigators who’ve been posting on the other threads. But most of all , this case presents us with a glowing real-life example which mirrors some pertinent counsel karolek had brought to this thread several posts ago.

The case is mentioned in a NY Times article entitled Rights Collide as Town Clerk Sidesteps Role in Gay Marriages .

In brief, the article is about elected Ledyard town clerk Mrs. Rose Marie Belforti, who appears to be about to lose her job because of the NY State Marriage Equality Act.

Right off the top, how about we note that word “Equality” again . How convenient .

A more accurate descriptive might be the* NY State Denial of the Truth Act*. As we are learning, the true meaning of “Equality” as colonized by homosexual activists and militants, is actually an attack on the family, on parents, on children and on other fundamental freedoms, the foremost of which is religious freedom.

If we wish to examine a story instead of simply reading it, the best way to start is to try and arrange things in chronological order if they aren’t already . When we do that, certain facts become much clearer - plain to see. As pointed out earlier in the thread , people who wish to present a distortion instead of the truth often try to cloud the truth by mixing up the chronological order of events.

In brief then, Ledyard NY town clerk Mrs. Rose Marie Belforti first won election as a town clerk a decade ago. She has been serving her constituents for quite a time , and appears to have proven herself performing the necessary tasks ,including cleaning the town hall bathrooms , maintenance of nine different record-keeping computer databases, and the town’s Web site.

In other words, it was all going fine until June this year when NY State’s Marriage Equality Act was approved . We further note that the same NY Times article mentions that two other town clerks have already been forced out of their jobs by the NYEA legislation in July this year (thankyou Gov. Cuomo …:ouch:. )

Mrs Belforti said in an interview in mid September 2011 ," New York law protects my right to hold both my job and my beliefs” , however the State Health Department issued a memorandum to clerks that refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples would be a misdemeanor.

The only thing at all I find beautiful about this story is Mrs. Belforti’s words when she explains to us her sense of conviction:

“For me to participate in the same-sex marriage application process I don’t feel is right,” she said. “God doesn’t want me to do this, so I can’t do what God doesn’t want me to do, just like I can’t steal, or any of the other things that God doesn’t want me to do.”

God bless her soul … brings a tear to the eye - doesn’t it ?

What a pure living expression of Blessed Cardinal von Galen’s counsel :


Blessed Cardinal von Galen gave out priciples to his flock to choose their religious beliefs over those issued by the Government.Here is an exert of what he writes in his pasteral letter on 6th.July 1941----

**"–there are sacred obligations of conscience from which **no one ****has the power to release us and which we must fulfil even if it costs us our lives…"

Blessed Cardinal Clemens von Galen,pray for us and to help us to obey what is just in God’s Sight ,regardless of the cost to us. Amen
AMEN,

and let’s be sure to say a prayer for Mrs. Rose Marie Belforti too guys.
 
Thanks - that’s a helpful indicator.The intention was, at least concerning the indoctrination of school children with the homosexual agenda, that enough information be presented for substantiation to convince people it’s actually happening ( - some of us would need a little more convincing than others.I have links to many more articles verifying the aforementioned and may post one from time to time if it’s pertinent).

The first chapter of David Kupelian’s book – The Marketing of Evil is being made available online for free. I would heartily urge anyone and everyone who is interested in getting informed ** on the tactics of the gay militants, and their overall strategy , to give this chapter a read – entitled How ‘gay rights’ is being sold to America.

I read this piece for the first time this week and found it not only confirms everything we’ve studied/presented on this thread, but reveals a ton more.

** ( @ hawkeye : please feel free to exempt yourself from these reading exercises if you wish ; no one is being asked to go beyond their personal limit and nobody needs to bring a note from home to be excused. We all do what we can – it’s enough no foul - no offense taken]. Additionally as David Kupelian notes: “Multitudes of activists – with almost limitless time and energy to devote to advancing their agenda, largely unencumbered by any need to change diapers, pay for dental braces, or attend their children’s soccer games, as do most heterosexual married people – have succeeded in their goal of transforming society. As public relations campaigns go, it’s been an unqualified success.”)

I think it took me between 8-10 minutes to read the chapter . Once a person has read it, the majority are going to need to get away from it - they’ll need a break . It’s that heavy . So, if anyone can watch their favourite comedian, or rent a movie and watch it with family or friends, or go out for dinner – whatever works ; they should probably do it. The weight of information being revealed can/will initially leave one discouraged, or feeling powerless , or depressed, or oppressed or all of the above. But we recover (the rosary works for me) with a much more precise picture of what is and has been going on behind our backs.

(There isn’t any way to blot out the sidebar advertisements where the article appears … so I just ignore them …🤷… Could you please note, the only thing I’m recommending we read on that page is Chapter One, available online).

The better informed we are, the better we’re going to be able to understand this problem . One would do well to follow up by reading this article from Real Women of Canada entitled HOW SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LEGISLATION WILL AFFECT OUR FUTURE . Now both of these articles were written several years ago. We discover that the indoctrination of children in the school systems with the homosexual agenda indicates we are already into the more advanced stages .

BTW, there was this one last thing I found while poking around WND’s site :
World Net Daily ; Joke of the Day; Oct 6:
Doctor: I’m sorry to have to tell you that you may have rabies, and it could prove fatal.

Patient: Well, doctor, please give me pencil and paper.

Doctor: To make your will?

Patient: No, to make a list of people I want to bite.
🙂
 
This is a comment that appeared on another thread in response to a post I made about Mrs. Rose Marie Belforti (mentioned 2 posts earlier in this thread) . The username of the member really has no bearing because I saw another similar comment from someone claiming to be Catholic.

There are some interesting comparisons to be made with the statement quoted directly below (and the question I asked in response [around 4 days ago I think] which remains unanswered). …Might need a break for a day or two. Anyhow, it’s nice and short - have a look. Get some ideas.
"username witheld- we're looking at wording only:
Accepting the application of a same-sex marriage was part of Mrs. Belforti’s job. When you go to a job, to work, especially for the government which affects many people who are different than you and share different views, you need to and should leave your personal and religious beliefs at the door. If you don’t like that, dion’t work that job.

NeedImprovement said:
This commentary is not very clear at all .You appear to be mixing up two things here. Which are you saying ? … That Mrs. Belforti should, *participate in the same sex marriage application process * , or not ?
… will check in later guys - need to take a break from writing 👍
 
Here is just one of the tragic real-life examples emerging of what can happen when same-sex members/couples are permitted to take the place of a mother and father in raising a child :

Controversial Therapy for Pre-Teen Transgender Patient Raises Questions .

Excerpt from the article:
Fox News:
A lesbian couple in California who say their 11-year-old son Tommy who wants to be a girl named Tammy are giving their child hormone blockers that delay the onset of puberty – so that he can have more time that he can have more time to decide if he wants to change his gender.

…But critics of the treatment say 11-year-olds are not old enough to make life-altering decisions about changing their gender, and parents should not be encouraging them. They say it’s too soon to tell what the side effects of the treatments may be, and they say Tommy’s parents, Pauline Moreno and Debra Lobel, are irresponsible for seeking them and allowing them to be administered

“This is child abuse. It’s like performing liposuction on an anorexic child,” said Dr. Paul McHugh, professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University.
“It is a disorder of the mind. Not a disorder of the body. Dealing with it in this way is not dealing with the problem that truly exists.
“We shouldn’t be mucking around with nature. We can’t assume what the outcome will be,” McHugh said.
 
Here is just one of the tragic real-life examples emerging of what can happen when same-sex members/couples are permitted to take the place of a mother and father in raising a child :

Controversial Therapy for Pre-Teen Transgender Patient Raises Questions .

Excerpt from the article:
That story is being reported in Australia as -

Lesbian couple want to help boy become girl.

The article tells us that -
A LESBIAN couple in California who say their 11-year-old son Tommy wants to be a girl named Tammy are giving their child hormone blockers that delay the onset of puberty, so that he can have more time to decide if he wants to change his gender.
One doesn’t need to be a rocket scientist to understand that children model the behaviour of their parents. Now here we have a boy, parented by two lesbians, who supposedly needs time to make up his mind about whether he wants to be a boy or a girl and are going to use drugs to control the situation until he makes up his mind. Isn’t that a little weird, considering mother nature has worked quite well for millions of years in helping us to decide what we are?

A professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University, Dr Paul McHugh, got it right when he said -
“This is child abuse. It’s like performing liposuction on an anorexic child,”.
You don’t really need to be a rocket scientist to figure out the truth of that statement either.

This is where the so called “equality” that gays sought is leading us. It is an issue that is far wider than the simple issue of gays wanting to be left alone and to be not discriminated against. They wish to normalise their perversion and this is now leading to messing with kids minds, all because they want to play mummy’s and daddies like normal people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top