Nude Photo's of My Wife

  • Thread starter Thread starter snorky
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What happened to the OP? I couldn’t find any clarification of his question. 😦
 
Does she get to take the same pictures of you?

why or why not?

Is not lust desiring something that is not yours?
 
I have a question that is really nagging me. If I was to take some semi nude photo’s of my wife, FOR ONLY ME TO SEE AND NO ONE ELSE., and they are not pornographic but done in taste. Is this wrong? I love my wife dearly, I find her the most beautiful woman in the world, and truly enjoy looking at her. These would be done with a digital camera so no one has to develop them also insuring only I would see them.
Thanks
Snorky
A case for discernment.

Can you absolutely know what the end result and the chain of events that will occur after you do this?
Can you absolutely be sure children won’t see it? Will your computer be sold eventually? Can a web hacker retreive your files? Can a thief take your storage device thinking it’s your account information?

I’d say put it off. Assume the negative.

The cause could be simply satiation of appetites, or evil influence or both. God allows evil to influence a person for period of time, but just so.

Summa:

“When the assault of demons is repulsed, the devil is not rendered incapable of further attack. But it seems he cannot return immediatley to the assault, but only after a lapse of a definite time”

Andy
 
I would say don’t do it. You have the real person whose beauty you can enjoy and whose physcial love you can share. Making pictures opens up other areas of lust disconnected from that person and as has been pointed out, to much room for those pictures to get out. Imagine if she photgraphed you and they got distributed. Suppose you got divorced and next thing you know they turned up on an internet voyeur site, etc. I thinkone of the talk shows did a program about the picture disasters that came from something that was just between you and me.

North
 
Your wife has dignity and is not and object for your pleasure. It seems to me as if it would degrade her by turning her into an object of “worship”. I would avoid it if I were you.
 
I have a question that is really nagging me. If I was to take some semi nude photo’s of my wife, FOR ONLY ME TO SEE AND NO ONE ELSE., and they are not pornographic but done in taste. Is this wrong? I love my wife dearly, I find her the most beautiful woman in the world, and truly enjoy looking at her. These would be done with a digital camera so no one has to develop them also insuring only I would see them.
Thanks
Snorky
LOL–first, I’m not sure you should be chatting about your wife like this with us:o …but since you are…what are you using the photos for? I believe that sexuality is to be admired by our spouses, but be careful…there’s a near occasion to sin in this, whereby we can easily fall into viewing that person as an ‘object,’ which takes away from the beauty of God’s intention of sexuality. Just some thoughts from the peanut gallery.
 
A) What does you wife say? She gets veto power.
B) How on earth are you going to make sure nobody ever sees these?
C) What is your plan b, plan c, and plan d for what happens if these don’t stay a secret? Is your wife ok with that…that is, do not try to tell her you are 100% sure no one else will ever see them, because you’re not.
D) Do you have a compelling reason…that is, are you away from home and faced with temptation a lot, are you going to be deployed somewhere, something like that?
E) How “semi-nude” is “semi-nude”?

If you’re talking underwear ad material, or even something like they did on “Calendar Girls”, and you and your wife are ready to cope with the possibility that they could fall into any and every wrong pair of hands you can think of…

It isn’t a sin to allow a husband to have non-pornographic pictures of his wife which would be less modest than they would want the whole world to see. You could do that.

I would define “non-pornographic” as appreciative of her body without objectifying her. It should be a picture that a father would theoretically be ok with his son-in-law having. We are on the theoretical grounds that her father thinks there is a man in the world good enough for his daughter in the first place! If the pose would make any man wonder what his daughter was thinking in marrying a guy like that, try again! 😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top