I
IrishAm
Guest
Last Sunday’s second collection was for the Campaign for Human Development. I am not a great fan, but always feel that I am obligated as a Catholic to put “something” in the collections that my bishop or my pastor have deemed appropriate. Even if it is just a little, I think it is an obligation to the community. Or maybe that’s just old-school “pay, pray and obey” mentality?
Anyway, the priest who celebrated Mass – whom I respect a great deal – made it a point during his homily to say he disagreed with the CHC and they hadn’t gotten a dime from him in many years. I was actually fairly shocked – not that he held the opinion but that he was proclaiming it from the pulpit on the day of the collection. Apparently our pastor agrees, as do others, for it all made the front page of the Washington Times today (washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/26/catholics-rebuffing-controversial-charity/ ). Our parish, I might add, is pretty conservative and very faithful to the teachings of the Church.
I do not want to digress into whether people agree or disagree with the Campaign for Human Development. That conversation is taking place on other threads. What I would like to hear are your opinions of priests making these statements, if you feel that in their comments against the second collection (which was at the direction of the bishop) the priests were behaving in a manner that was disobedient to the bishop and, by extension, the Church?
(And, no, I really don’t have an opinion. I agreed with much of what was said, but was very uncomfortable that it was being said in the homily. It seemed just seemed wrong . . . or maybe it seemed “right” but at the “wrong place, wrong time.” )
Anyway, the priest who celebrated Mass – whom I respect a great deal – made it a point during his homily to say he disagreed with the CHC and they hadn’t gotten a dime from him in many years. I was actually fairly shocked – not that he held the opinion but that he was proclaiming it from the pulpit on the day of the collection. Apparently our pastor agrees, as do others, for it all made the front page of the Washington Times today (washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/26/catholics-rebuffing-controversial-charity/ ). Our parish, I might add, is pretty conservative and very faithful to the teachings of the Church.
I do not want to digress into whether people agree or disagree with the Campaign for Human Development. That conversation is taking place on other threads. What I would like to hear are your opinions of priests making these statements, if you feel that in their comments against the second collection (which was at the direction of the bishop) the priests were behaving in a manner that was disobedient to the bishop and, by extension, the Church?
(And, no, I really don’t have an opinion. I agreed with much of what was said, but was very uncomfortable that it was being said in the homily. It seemed just seemed wrong . . . or maybe it seemed “right” but at the “wrong place, wrong time.” )