My argument has been about whether it’s possible to establish an ‘objective morality’ - which, I have argued, causes more problems than it resolves - partly - for example - because one has to resort to ideas like ‘Aristotelean Essentialism’ in attempting to make the whole concept work. While that might prove a satisfying means to people who actually work within that paradigm, it doesn’t for the rest of us.
Neither does it have to.
