Objective Reality not what it seems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aprendo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Aprendo

Guest
I wasn’t sure exactly where to put this but this seemed apt. It’s something I came across kind of randomly for physics, an area I used to know more about but am having brush up quite a bit.
The Universe as a Hologram
twm.co.nz/hologram.html
David Bohm on Perception
youtube.com/watch?v=Mst3fOl5vH0&feature=related
Reality as You Know it does not exist
youtube.com/watch?v=OZj9Qps8H6M&feature=related
Quantum physics explained simply
youtube.com/watch?v=cEl-fTtP2tw&feature=related
Holographic Universe
youtube.com/watch?v=hMLVjFrtq6Q
Hmm…sounds interesting and something I’m going to look into before I can be more sure what to think. Any thoughts or correlating links?
 
spaceandmotion.com/Physics-David-Bohm-Holographic-Universe.htm

This seems to explain it best! Really cool! It ties in resolution for quantum mechanics and special relativity.

Then in 1982 a remarkable event took place. At the University of Paris a research team led by physicist Alain Aspect performed what may turn out to be one of the most important experiments of the 20th century. There are some who believe his discovery may change the face of science. Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances subatomic particles are able to instantaneously communicate with each other regardless of the distance separating them. It doesn’t matter whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion miles apart. Somehow each particle always seems to know what the other is doing.

The following article on David Bohm’s Wholeness and Implicate Order is very consistent with the Wave Structure of Matter. That at a fundamental level reality is not made of discrete and separate parts (particles), but One interconnected whole (the Holographic Universe).

David Bohm believes the reason subatomic particles are able to remain in contact with one another regardless of the distance separating them is not because they are sending some sort of mysterious signal back and forth, but because their separateness is an illusion. Bohm postulates that the ultimate nature of physical reality is not a collection of separate objects (as it appears to us), but rather it is an undivided whole that is in perpetual dynamic flux. For Bohm, the insights of quantum mechanics and relativity theory point to a universe that is undivided and in which all parts merge and unite in one totality.

GH - The central point here is that our mind represents our senses (due to our evolution based on survival) rather than providing a true picture of reality. However, reason tells us that matter is clearly interconnected (e.g. the earth orbits the sun) and that there must be knowledge flowing into matter to explain how we can see things around us. This is correct, and explained by the Spherical In-Waves which form the ‘particle’ effect of matter at their Wave-Center.

Capitalizing on Pribram’s findings, Bohm states that our brains are smaller pieces of the larger hologram. That our brains contain the whole knowledge of the universe. So, you can see how each mind has a limited perspective of the universal hologram. Our brains are our windows of perception. Each mind always contains the whole picture, but with a limited and unclear perspective. We each have different experience in our lives, but each perspective is valid. Our brains mathematically construct objective reality by interpreting frequencies that are ultimately projections form another dimension, a deeper order of existence that is beyond both space and time.

GH - Time, along with particles, is a human representation, both being caused by the wave Motion of Space (thus the name of this website SpaceandMotion). So the Wave Structure of Matter is founded on the Metaphysics of Space and (wave) Motion rather than Space and Time. But Space itself does physically exist (as a Wave-Medium).
 
Apollo Astronaut Ed Mitchell, the sixth man to walk on the Moon, wrote an excellent book called “The Way of The Explorer” on the spiritual implications of this theory…
 
Quantum Mechanics is often misrepresented and used to prove all sorts of magical stuff, so I would be very skeptical of anything people who aren’t professional physicists have to say about it.

The first article you linked in particular was written by Michael Talbot, here is a link to the book he wrote: amazon.ca/Holographic-Universe-Michael-Talbot/dp/0060922583

The summary has this:
Talbot explains in clear terms the theory and physics of holography and its application, both in science** and in explanation of the paranormal and psychic.**
I doubt you’d be able to find many professional physicists who would use QM to explain psychics and the paranormal.

If you’re interested in the physics, I would recommend popular science books written by physicists (or if you have the mathematical background, study the real thing from the kinds of books a physics student would read).

And don’t be saddened by what I said, what has proven itself again and again to be true in science is that the truth is far more wondrous and strange than anything man has been able to make up.
 
In Search of Schroedinger’s Cat, by John Gribben, is an excellent book to give the lay person a good grasp of what QM is about.
 
I appreciate! I put aprendo because I realize 'til the day I day there will always be things I don’t know. It’s hard to know with quantum physics who’s telling the truth or not. Right now I’m working on How to teach physics to your dog by chad orzel a physics professor who is explaining physics to his dog and is very entertaining.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top