D
Dauphin
Guest
Hi,
This morning’s mass was done in a way I’ve never seen before, and I just want to make sure that there’s nothing irregular about it.
The mass began with a Gospel reading from the back of the cathedral, just below the choir loft (the priest had a clip-on microphone). After the reading, the procession continued to the sanctuary. For the Gospel reading during the liturgy of the word, there were three readers: the priest and two laypeople (a man and a woman). They did a ‘reenactment’ of Luke 22:14 to 23:49 (just reading, no moving). The man narrated, the priest took the voice of Jesus Christ, and the woman took the voice of Peter. The choir also took the voice of ‘the crowd’ at times.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I was under the impression that Gospel readings were only to be done during the liturgy of the word, and only in the sanctuary. I also believed that the priest was the only one who could read from the Gospels. Am I wrong? Is this particular type of mass acceptable on Palm Sunday?
This morning’s mass was done in a way I’ve never seen before, and I just want to make sure that there’s nothing irregular about it.
The mass began with a Gospel reading from the back of the cathedral, just below the choir loft (the priest had a clip-on microphone). After the reading, the procession continued to the sanctuary. For the Gospel reading during the liturgy of the word, there were three readers: the priest and two laypeople (a man and a woman). They did a ‘reenactment’ of Luke 22:14 to 23:49 (just reading, no moving). The man narrated, the priest took the voice of Jesus Christ, and the woman took the voice of Peter. The choir also took the voice of ‘the crowd’ at times.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I was under the impression that Gospel readings were only to be done during the liturgy of the word, and only in the sanctuary. I also believed that the priest was the only one who could read from the Gospels. Am I wrong? Is this particular type of mass acceptable on Palm Sunday?