O
on_the_hill
Guest
I find that’s the case with a lot of things.I
I have never heard as many complaints about it until.I came to CAF.
:
I find that’s the case with a lot of things.I
I have never heard as many complaints about it until.I came to CAF.
:
I would not go as far as that. What the Church decides on the liturgy is fine with me.The common Sign of Peace should just go. The time for fellowship is in the hall after Mass, not during.
Close observance of the girm? Then there would be no liturgical disagreements ever!!!I would not go as far as that. What the Church decides on the liturgy is fine with me.
I still think a close observance of the GIRM woukd solve this issue. Unfortunately in some countries, parishes are not updated accordingly.
Right … GIRM (General Instruction of the Roman Missal). It is all spelt out there .Close observance of the girm? Then there would be no liturgical disagreements ever!!!
Before and after I converted, there was a time when the only physical touch I received from another human being all week was during the sign of peace. I was always so grateful for it. It taught me to look around and pay attention to those are are at mass alone, especially the elderly who tend to sit in the back of my parish. If I am ushering I always make a point to be near them at the sign of peace so I can touch them and look them in the eye. I always wonder how much human contact they received the prior week. Some of them seem so grateful that somebody is paying attention to them even for such a brief moment.Is the sign of peace on its way out? At different parishes in my diocese, priests are omitting the “Let us offer each other the sign of peace” sentence in the mass.(and I am in a ‘liberal’ diocese)
Since the rubric says “Then, if appropriate, the Deacon or the Priest, adds: “Let us offer each other the sign of peace”” I assume the sign of peace is not mandatory.
Has anyone else noticed priests dropping the sign of peace from the mass?
I for one, tend to be very emotional at mass and by the time the sign of peace comes I am often a wreck, even though I fight against the emotion. My face and hands are a mess with tears, a runny nose and dirty tissue and I do not want to spread that to others with a handshake. I try not to shake hands for the others’ sakes - which can be perceived as not loving or as aloof…
I would just as soon see the sign of peace be removed entirely from practice. We are already being united as one when we receive the Eucharist - a handshake cannot make us closer than that. Or am I missing something?
While that can be a benifit, it is not " the point" if the sign of peace in the liturgy.“It’s not my favorite part, but it did force me to face and overcome anxiety about literally reaching out to strangers.”
I think that’s the point. Reaching out to those we do not know around us. We don’t often know those in the pews around us. So likely we do not know those who are homeless around us. I am one who still has to deal with being uncomfortable with this. I think Jesus wanted us to get out of ourselves and deal with this.
Just my thoughts.
Pacem to all.
No, our parish got so bad we have had to leave. We are nomad Catholics right now with no real options. I’m not going to hijack the thread but man, we are struggling.Right … GIRM (General Instruction of the Roman Missal). It is all spelt out there .
Have your parish gone through it?
An embarrassed handshake in the middle of mass is not “reaching out” .“It’s not my favorite part, but it did force me to face and overcome anxiety about literally reaching out to strangers.”
I think that’s the point. Reaching out to those we do not know around us. We don’t often know those in the pews around us. So likely we do not know those who are homeless around us. I am one who still has to deal with being uncomfortable with this. **I think Jesus wanted us to get out of ourselves and deal with this.
**
Just my thoughts.
Pacem to all.
Interesting angle but why then not go to the elderly alone immediately after mass and make REAL contact? I do this.Before and after I converted, there was a time when the only physical touch I received from another human being all week was during the sign of peace. I was always so grateful for it. It taught me to look around and pay attention to those are are at mass alone, especially the elderly who tend to sit in the back of my parish. If I am ushering I always make a point to be near them at the sign of peace so I can touch them and look them in the eye. I always wonder how much human contact they received the prior week. Some of them seem so grateful that somebody is paying attention to them even for such a brief moment.
Please God you find a “home” church… I know how much that means to you from your posts, Blessings and peace!No, our parish got so bad we have had to leave. We are nomad Catholics right now with no real options. I’m not going to hijack the thread but man, we are struggling.
Actually he is showing great sense and practical kindness especially making sure folk SEE him cleaning his hands. Germs and viruses can so easily be spread by handshakes. Well done your pastor! Reassuring his flock and caring about themWe wave to each other. But our English language masses aren’t the most heavily attended in the Parish so and people tend to leave lots of space between them and people they haven’t come with so shaking hands is inconvenient. I don’t know how it’s done in the other language masses that are are more heavily attended and are of a different culture.
Also, there’s a large asian refugee community (from different countries) in our Parish so there’s a lot of bowing as well–even in the English Masses. I’ve not been to the Vietnamese or Indonesian Sunday Masses but our Daily English mass is mostly Vietnamese and was celebrated by a Vietnamese priest (he died two weeks ago.)
On Sunday our Pastor does go into the pews and shakes peoples hands in the front and he very visibly uses sanitizer afterwards. I’m not sure about legal propriety of doing any of that but I think it’s hilarious. before he returns to the table he’s sanitizing his hands.![]()
Because I am a convert who has gone to mass alone a lot, and I am an introvert so need some sort of impetus to do what you suggest. Plus I often usher so I have other duties to attend to once mass is over.Interesting angle but why then not go to the elderly alone immediately after mass and make REAL contact? I do this.
By the way I am both elderly and alone but do not crave what you suggest. Now a real chat etc is a different matter.
To be fair, it’s one heck of a stretch to somehow associate a two second handshake and a bit of a smile as being the “love of Christ.” That certainly won’t make a lonely person any less lonely, and it won’t be much of a comfort to those elderly folks whose children have abandoned them to their old age. We’ll have to do a lot more than just a ritualistic greeting, I’m afraid. Folks need real friends and real fellowship … and the time and place for that is absolutely open for debate. I don’t want you coming over to my house at 2 AM to keep me company, and I don’t want you interrupting Mass, either. Dinner is a different matter.I now understand why so many of our Protestant brothers & sisters think Catholics are cold & uncaring.
I would hate to miss an opportunity to share the love of Christ because a vocal minority is out of their “comfort zone”