K
Krisdun
Guest
Also has it always existed in its current form?
Apart from Pole.The turning point came with Cranmer. He was Archbishop of Canterbury for 22 years, from 1533 to 1555. He was the last Catholic archbishop of Canterbury
He is not even a Bishop! St Leo XIII says so!The diocese has continued to exist to this day, Justin Welby is the 105th holder of the see.
Yes indeed. So he did. On the other hand the OP asked about the CofE which, as I am sure you are aware, holds a different opinion. Catholics, of course, will follow Leo in this matter.He is not even a Bishop! St Leo XIII says so!
No, it was the same diocese, but it passed from the control of the Pope and became an Anglican diocese.The Catholic Canterbury diocese and Anglican Canterbury diocese I assume were two different dioceses belonging to two distinct churches. But interesting to know nonetheless that one man switched from being a bishop of one church to another. I wonder what Thomas Cranmer truly thought about it all deep down at the time?
Thank you, I was writing from memory. I ought to have fact-checked.Supreme Head, in Henrys case.
1534 Act of Supremacy.
It is possible yes although it would be a difficult decision to make for both clergy and lay people to join a different church be it Roman Catholic or Orthodox for example.2 But it seems to me much more likely that such matters will lead to individuals taking their faith journey elsewhere than dioceses splitting off in the US way.