"Oh but it wasn't how it was done at the last supper and in the early church"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason_Matthew
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Someone I know said to me that because the Tridentine Mass is not how it was done at the Last Supper and in the early church, it is not how mass should be celebrated. He further went on and said that Jesus did not have his back faced towards the disciples during the Last Supper and therefore, ad orientem should not be used

I tried to explain to him that the mass developed and evolved as a result of increased theological understanding and the changing of circumstances but he is still reluctant.

How do you counter his argument?
Pretty simple. Christ is Christ. The priest is not Christ. Christ is in the Tabernacle so we face Christ. (The Tabernacle)

When it all started, facing the priest and all, it made many priests think they were to entertain, hence where we are today. Not to say all priests do it this way, but it did happen. It took the focus away from the sacrifice of the mass. the Eucharist. Then tabernacles began to be ‘moved’ to ‘private chapels’ outside the church… pretty sad if you ask me… it’s quite unfortunate this had to happen.
 
The priest is not Christ.
CCC
1548 In the ecclesial service of the ordained minister, it is Christ himself who is present to his Church as Head of his Body, Shepherd of his flock, high priest of the redemptive sacrifice, Teacher of Truth. This is what the Church means by saying that the priest, by virtue of the sacrament of Holy Orders, acts in persona Christi Capitis:23
It is the same priest, Christ Jesus, whose sacred person his minister truly represents. Now the minister, by reason of the sacerdotal consecration which he has received, is truly made like to the high priest and possesses the authority to act in the power and place of the person of Christ himself (virtute ac persona ipsius Christi).24
Christ is the source of all priesthood: the priest of the old law was a figure of Christ, and the priest of the new law acts in the person of Christ.25
 
Pretty simple. Christ is Christ. The priest is not Christ. Christ is in the Tabernacle so we face Christ. (The Tabernacle)

When it all started, facing the priest and all, it made many priests think they were to entertain, hence where we are today. Not to say all priests do it this way, but it did happen. It took the focus away from the sacrifice of the mass. the Eucharist. Then tabernacles began to be ‘moved’ to ‘private chapels’ outside the church… pretty sad if you ask me… it’s quite unfortunate this had to happen.
Actually, the priest acts in persona Christi. Otherwise yes.

And for the record, there were actually no tabernacles on the altar for quite a long time. To quote from Wikipedia:

The following historical information is found, for instance, in the article The casing of the Eucharist by the Secretary of the Congregation for the Clergy, Archbishop Mauro Piacenza, who also heads the Pontifical Commission for the Cultural Patrimony of the Catholic Church, in 30DAYS, No.6 Year XXIII – June 2005.

In early Christianity, priests and even lay people took bread consecrated at their Eucharistic [sic] to their homes, in order to give it to the sick and others unable to attend the celebration. But when the Edict of Milan ended persecution, the practice was established of keeping the Eucharist only in churches and no longer in people’s homes.

The preferred container then had the form of a (usually gold) dove within a (usually silver) tower. There is mention of a gift of these two vessels, both of gold and adorned with 250 white pearls, that the Emperor Constantine gave to Saint Peter’s Basilica in Rome, and of silver towers and golden doves given to particular churches by Pope Innocent I and Pope Hilarius.

The vessels were kept in a place called the “sacrarium” or “pastophorium” away from the central body of the church or were suspended by fine chains from the middle of the canopy (hence called a “ciborium” or bread store) above the altar of the church. Gian Lorenzo Bernini’s 29-metre-high Baroque baldacchino over the main altar in today’s Saint Peter’s Basilica is at present the best-known such structure. Later, simpler vessels replaced to some extent the dove and the tower.

By the thirteenth century, the Eucharist was most often kept in a highly embellished cabinet inserted into the wall to the right or left of the altar. The Sanctuary lamp indicated the Presence of Christ. This was a means of following the decree of the 1215 Fourth Lateran Council requiring that the reserved sacrament be kept in a locked receptacle.

In the late fourteenth century, special stone constructions for the Eucharistic bread began to be built, especially in northern Europe. In German and Netherlands churches of the period, such structures can still be seen: tall towers, known in German as Sakramentshäuser, in Dutch as sacramentstorens, usually placed to the north of the altar and often reaching almost to the ceiling. They were in use until the mid-nineteenth century. As the presence of the sanctuary lamp in the picture to the right shows, some have been returned to their traditional use.

German examples are found in the church of St Laurence in Nuremberg (18.70 metres), the minster of Salem (16 metres), Saints Peter and Paul city church in Weil der Stadt (over 11 metres), the church of Our Lady in Lübeck (9.5 metres), and St Mary’s cathedral in Fürstenwalde on the Spree. Belgian churches include St Catherine’s in Zuurbemde, St Martin’s in Kortrijk, St Peter’s and St James’s in Leuven, and St Leonard’s in Zoutleeuw.

In the early sixteenth century, Bishop Matteo Giberti ordered that, in his diocese of Verona, in Italy, the container case for the consecrated bread should be placed on an altar. The custom spread through northern Italy. Saint Charles Borromeo, who became Archbishop of Milan, Italy in 1560, had the Sacrament moved from the sacristy to an altar (not the main altar) of his cathedral. The edition of the Roman Missal revised and promulgated by Pope Pius V in 1570 (see Tridentine Mass) still did not envisage placing the tabernacle on an altar: it laid down instead that the altar card containing some of the principal prayers of the Mass should rest against a cross placed midway on the altar (Rubricae generales Missalis, XX - De Praeparatione Altaris, et Ornamentorum eius). However, in 1614 Pope Paul V imposed on the churches of his diocese of Rome the rule of putting the tabernacle on some altar. Reaction to Protestantism’s denial of the reality and permanence of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist then led to the spread of the placing of the tabernacle even on the high altar, so as to make it more evidently visible. Whether on the main altar of the church or in a special chapel, the tabernacle became more and more large and ornate, to the extent of dominating the altar.
 
Reaction to Protestantism’s denial of the reality and permanence of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist then led to the spread of the placing of the tabernacle even on the high altar, so as to make it more evidently visible. Whether on the main altar of the church or in a special chapel, the tabernacle became more and more large and ornate, to the extent of dominating the altar.
Yes, it’s a very simple and bold statement to put Him as the focus in a church. In your face, heretics!
 
Yes, it’s a very simple and bold statement to put Him as the focus in a church. In your face, heretics!
Yep. Unfortunately as was pointed out some people seem to like to devise creative ways to hide Jesus from view. 🤷 Again Cardinal Arinze:

Why do so many churches not place the tabernacle in the center of the altar or in a prominent place?

The directives from Rome – including the new Missal issued two years ago – say that the tabernacle in which the Blessed Sacrament is reserved is to be located in a very prominent place either at the center or at such a side altar that it is really prominent and that around it there are kneelers and chairs so that people can pray – kneel down or sit down. And it is to be so prominent that nobody should need to look for it when you enter the church.

Therefore, whenever you enter a church and you look for the tabernacle where the Blessed Sacrament is reserved and you do not easily see it, then those who arrange it are already wrong. Because it should be prominent – it should stand out – to show our faith.

However, it is not a law that it must be at the center. But it is a law that where it is should be prominent. And that it should be easy for people to see it and to go there and pray. But unfortunately in some churches, sometimes those who did it did not know. But they did not know that they did not know.

So you enter the church and you ask where is the tabernacle? “They have taken the Lord away and we do not know where they have put Him”. That’s what Mary Magdalene said on Easter day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top