G
Greg_McPherran
Guest
I know that a priest is obliged not to reveal anything he has been told in confession. However, Is it OK for a confessor to discuss with others what the priest told him/her?
Greg
Greg
baltobetsy said:“Confessor” is the priest who hears the confesssion. “Penitent” is the person doing the confessing. Confusing.
Understood. For example, I might mention some things to my wife related to our marriage or I might wish to reveal a dissenting opinion given to me in confession. In general, I would very rarely discuss my confessions.You are free to talk about it with whomever you wish, but prudence will limit the extent to which you do this.
Princess Abby,I have read, too, that the only time a priest is allowed to discuss what was told to him in confession is if the person receiving the sacrament approaches him at any point afterward and asks to discuss the subject or whatever came up during the sacrament.
I believe that you are right. A good priest also has the extra graces to “forget” what he has heard in persona Christi.Princess Abby,
I think you are wrong here…somebody please correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think that the priest can discuss your confession ever… even with you after you have come out of the Confessional.
Annunciata![]()
Somehow my question thread here got hijacked.I believe that you are right. A good priest also has the extra graces to “forget” what he has heard in persona Christi.
MrS
Yes, if he chooses to. Now, if it is discussed to cast dispersion on the priest for his comments, that is wrong and that becomes sinful, but still his choice.I am asking a simple question. May a penitent discuss what a priest told him/her in confession?
I once had a very holy confessor, who is now a bishop, btw. Once he recommended a book for me to read, and offered to lend me his copy. He told me to ask him for it specifically outside the confessional, because he could not use any information from my confession outside, even something as simple as lending a book, and even for my own benefit.Princess Abby,
I think you are wrong here…somebody please correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think that the priest can discuss your confession ever… even with you after you have come out of the Confessional.
Annunciata![]()
Thank you MrS. What if a priest tells someone something against Church teaching and they want to expose that?Yes, if he chooses to. Now, if it is discussed to cast dispersion on the priest for his comments, that is wrong and that becomes sinful, but still his choice.
That is interesting information. However, my question relates to someone discussing what a priest told them with a third party. For example, Nancy tells Sue something that the priest told her (Nancy) in confession.If you wish to discuss an ongoing problem with the priest outside the confessional, you may do that as well, but the priest must not use any information gained from you in the confessional, so you’ll have to start from the beginning. At that point, the information is no longer subject to the seal of confession, so subsequent conversations can be based on the first one outside confession.
Does this help?
Betsy
Oh, you’re no fun!Dear Moderators, please entertain a blanket request to ban posters on these forums from discussing the matter of their own confessions here.
Those whoever accidently heard other confession has to have the same responsibility as the priest. When you need to know the answer. If you need help, you should talk to the priest.
Anthony
Nancy, not bound by the seal of confession because she is not the priest, may tell Sue anything she wants about the confession, including her own sins if she wishes (but we hope she doesn’t), and whatever advice was given to her by the priest. She can tell the advice in the context of sharing a wonderful insight or even a warning not to go to that priest, because he teaches contrary to the Church. What she may not do is pass along negative information without a just cause. If what she has been told by the priest is confusing or outright wrong, she may seek clarification of the issue from another priest, or contact the bishop, if she feels it’s that far out of line. This would be far more productive than discussing the matter with Sue, unless Sue is a canon lawyer!However, my question relates to someone discussing what a priest told them with a third party. For example, Nancy tells Sue something that the priest told her (Nancy) in confession.
There is a caution here. It is unfair to accuse a priest of saying this or that when he cannot respond to defend himself. It is probably wrong to repeat anything detrimental to the priest unless it is a real wrong - which should be reported through proper channels, not gossiped about.Nancy, not bound by the seal of confession because she is not the priest, may tell Sue anything she wants about the confession, including her own sins if she wishes (but we hope she doesn’t), and whatever advice was given to her by the priest. She can tell the advice in the context of sharing a wonderful insight or even a warning not to go to that priest, because he teaches contrary to the Church. What she may not do is pass along negative information without a just cause. If what she has been told by the priest is confusing or outright wrong, she may seek clarification of the issue from another priest, or contact the bishop, if she feels it’s that far out of line. This would be far more productive than discussing the matter with Sue, unless Sue is a canon lawyer!
Betsy