i’m not really talking about a 10,000 year old earth, just a younger earth, by how much does not matter. in fact it would be better not to put an age on the earth in advance. i’m saying that as thinking creatures we can test an idea without prejudice. imagine the earth is young, visualize something which you would expect to see in that case, then go look for it.
the kt extinction is kinda like that. if you imagine one scenario in which half the plants died out suddenly or even immediately you could go look for specific types of evidence. and the result of that might be that an entire system which was thought to be slow was in fact fast.
but if prejudice prevents even thinking then we cannot learn anything.
you see, the thing is the lagomorph
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...pg/220px-Oryctolagus_cuniculus_Tasmania_2.jpg
was already developed 53 million years ago, or what we call 53 million years ago, but these are just the first bones discovered. the rabbit must have had millions of years before that to evolve.
and then of course the dinosaurs would have been alive with the rabbit if it wasn’t for an unexplainable extinction event which could kill all the dinosaurs all around the world but could not kill the rabbits.