On burning heretics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dakota_Roberts
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
3 quick responses

** 1. If Luther had been burned at the stake or otherwise executed, more reformers would have come forward.** A number had been killed for their heresy before Luther which did not slow down the rmovement to reform a corrupt church. Had the Papacy shown greater wisdom, it would not have waited until the Council of Trent to make sweeping reforms. Unfortunately, also, in some respects the Council of Trent took actions that simply propelled the Reformation rather than squelching it.

** 2. I would certainly rather live in the US where there is separation of church and state to living where any one religion had the power to enforce its views on the wider society.** As but one example, if traditional Catholicism dominated in the US birth control would be outlawed (except for the Catholic-approved method). Other religions would either not be permitted or severely regulated as they were as late as the days of Franco Spain.

** 3. It’s not 10% of Catholics who have left the Catholic Church. That’s more like 30% or higher.** It’s that 10% of Americans (30,000,000 of 300,000,000) were once Catholics who have left the church. The number of Catholics in the USA today is roughly 70,000,000. Roughly 150,000,000 are Protestants. The Catholic figure would have fallen had not there been a major migration of Hispanics to the USA. Probably half of all those who identify as Catholics are of the cafeteria variety. Many Hispanics have drifted to Pentecostal or other forms of Protestantism.

** 4. Fr. McBrien of Notre Dame has a superb column today on why Catholics are leaving the church.** It’s in our daily paper every Saturday, and I hope many will read it and ponder. It would be helpful if the hierarchy took it to heart.

** God bless everybody. Let us get rid of our fervent, narrow tribalism** and remember that people of every creed, color, culture and country are treasured children of our one God. The Lord surely would want us to make religion a bridge rather than a barrier. This continuing battle over the reformers, for example, is ridiculous. It has caused bigotry for 500 years. There should be room in the church for different points of view. Otherwise, we seem to be devalueing the brain God has given us.
 
How very ironic.

While our current pope calls out to an end to the Death Penalty (as his blessed predecessor did before him), we sit around on a Catholic forum discussing the justification behind burning people alive for expressing different religious beliefs.
I agree 100% 👍

Its very dishearterning to say the least 😦
 
Well, you make a good point, too, in saying that it isn’t the Church which heresy can destroy, but the souls of individual persons by leading them astray. But then again, so can any mortal sin and any person who commits a mortal sin, and yet, we do not advocate the murder or burning of all sinners. This is why, in a previous post, I mentioned the refusal of Jesus to condone the stoning of the woman caught in adultery,…
I definitely see your point. Could it be, though, that what Christ was doing was teaching us against “mob justice” and that it is the Church that has the only authority to decide on such things? We individual sinners can’t condemn a person to death, but can the Church…if She is acting per guidance of the Holy Spirit? (And just FYI, I am not pro-death-penalty, but I do see some logic in this particular topic. )

As Debora123 brings up, the Church is trying to teach against this mentality it seems. But even so, it would be for the Church to decide on a case of a heretic. So, it could still be reasoned that the Church would follow Matt 18:6…maybe…

Definitely, however, we the laity cannot decide on whether a person lives or dies in the case of heresy…we are definitely all sinners who have earned death.
 
How very ironic.

While our current pope calls out to an end to the Death Penalty (as his blessed predecessor did before him), we sit around on a Catholic forum discussing the justification behind burning people alive for expressing different religious beliefs.
I agree. What is sad to me is that those justifying such an action give a wrong impression of Christianity/Catholicism, scare people away from the Church and push those having doubts into deciding to leave.
 
I agree. What is sad to me is that those justifying such an action give a wrong impression of Christianity/Catholicism, scare people away from the Church and push those having doubts into deciding to leave.
That’s another really good point. On one hand, it can show how important our Faith is…what the stakes really are in Christianity…our souls are at stake. But on the other hand, if we present this too harshly, it ends up making us out to be torch-and-pitchfork mobsters. These types of topics have to be presented honestly and charitably…a combination that is difficult at best.
 
I agree 100% 👍

Its very dishearterning to say the least 😦
We aren’t talking about the person who has fallen into heresy, we are talking about the stand on corner with sign saying “Repent the end is near” type people. We aren’t talking about apostates or people who were never Catholic, we are talking about those who are undermining the Church from inside.
 
We aren’t talking about the person who has fallen into heresy, we are talking about the stand on corner with sign saying “Repent the end is near” type people. We aren’t talking about apostates or people who were never Catholic, we are talking about those who are undermining the Church from inside.
I don’t think it matters to us who exactly the HUMAN BEINGS are that are being referred to.

Either way, these truths from my post remain:
  1. Current pope spoke out to end the death penalty,
  2. Previous BLESSED pope spoke out to end the death penalty,
  3. Certain Catholic members of a Catholic forum are attempting to justify the idea of burning people alive for expressing opposing religious beliefs.
… Is it ironic? You betcha.
 
I don’t think it matters to us who exactly the HUMAN BEINGS are that are being referred to.

Either way, these truths from my post remain:
  1. Current pope spoke out to end the death penalty,
  2. Previous BLESSED pope spoke out to end the death penalty,
  3. Certain Catholic members of a Catholic forum are attempting to justify the idea of burning people alive for expressing opposing religious beliefs.
… Is it ironic? You betcha.
These days you can imprison people indefinitely, back in the Middle Ages that simply wasn’t possible. Examine why they speak out.
 
  1. Certain Catholic members of a Catholic forum are attempting to justify the idea of burning people alive for expressing opposing religious beliefs.
Don’t count me in this group please.

~ Pius :knight1:
 
Don’t count me in this group please.

~ Pius :knight1:
Or me. I personally am not trying to ‘justify’ anything (and I am entirely in favor of abolishing the death penalty).

But it has come to a pretty pass when it appears that far too many people on both sides of an issue do not seem to understand that an attempt to understand the context in which an event occurred is NOT in itself an ENDORSEMENT of the event.

I’m only 55, people. The Sisters of Mercy who fostered my tender development all through elementary school knew I wasn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer:D, nor were most of my classmates, but they knew what ‘impartiality’ meant and they made sure we knew it too. So what happened in the last 40 years to completely unravel centuries of hard-won knowledge and advancement?

Did those who were correctly taught simply give up because it just got too hard to counter the shrill invective of ‘mob mentality’? (I ask because while on ‘public’ boards people want to be on the ‘winning side’, outside that I find people to be much more reasonable and far less didactic. Maybe when you’re ‘face to face’ with somebody it’s easier to LISTEN, on both sides, instead of trying to ‘score points’ and look good.)
 
Don’t count me in this group please.

~ Pius :knight1:
Likewise
Or me. I personally am not trying to ‘justify’ anything (and I am entirely in favor of abolishing the death penalty).

But it has come to a pretty pass when it appears that far too many people on both sides of an issue do not seem to understand that an attempt to understand the context in which an event occurred is NOT in itself an ENDORSEMENT of the event.

I’m only 55, people. The Sisters of Mercy who fostered my tender development all through elementary school knew I wasn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer:D, nor were most of my classmates, but they knew what ‘impartiality’ meant and they made sure we knew it too. So what happened in the last 40 years to completely unravel centuries of hard-won knowledge and advancement?

Did those who were correctly taught simply give up because it just got too hard to counter the shrill invective of ‘mob mentality’? (I ask because while on ‘public’ boards people want to be on the ‘winning side’, outside that I find people to be much more reasonable and far less didactic. Maybe when you’re ‘face to face’ with somebody it’s easier to LISTEN, on both sides, instead of trying to ‘score points’ and look good.)
I am also in favour of abolishing Capital punishment

Someone finally gets it.

The socialists won the Cold War

People seem to be knee jerk reacting to the original post
 
I don’t think it matters to us who exactly the HUMAN BEINGS are that are being referred to.

Either way, these truths from my post remain:
  1. Current pope spoke out to end the death penalty,
  2. Previous BLESSED pope spoke out to end the death penalty,
  3. Certain Catholic members of a Catholic forum are attempting to justify the idea of burning people alive for expressing opposing religious beliefs.
… Is it ironic? You betcha.
Absolutely not. Point 3 in no way contradicts points 1 or 2.

Like JP2 and B16 I support an end to the death penalty, but no pope ever has, or ever will, say that it is wrong in principle for a properly constituted civil authority to execute people for grave crimes (including heresy in the circumstances where this occurred) where the convict’s guuilt has been proven beyond reasonable doubt, there seems no possibility he will repent and reform and there seems no other equally effective punishment available.
 
Absolutely not. Point 3 in no way contradicts points 1 or 2.

Like JP2 and B16 I support an end to the death penalty, but no pope ever has, or ever will, say that it is wrong in principle for a properly constituted civil authority to execute people for grave crimes (including heresy in the circumstances where this occurred) where the convict’s guuilt has been proven beyond reasonable doubt, there seems no possibility he will repent and reform and there seems no other equally effective punishment available.
This makes absolutely 0 sense. Not to mention the notion of burning a human being alive is heinous enough. The notion of burning a human being for expressing opposing religious beliefs?? God help us all that there are people in this world who apparently still consider this anything short of horrendous and evil.
 
Or me. I personally am not trying to ‘justify’ anything (and I am entirely in favor of abolishing the death penalty).

But it has come to a pretty pass when it appears that far too many people on both sides of an issue do not seem to understand that an attempt to understand the context in which an event occurred is NOT in itself an ENDORSEMENT of the event.

I’m only 55, people. The Sisters of Mercy who fostered my tender development all through elementary school knew I wasn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer:D, nor were most of my classmates, but they knew what ‘impartiality’ meant and they made sure we knew it too. So what happened in the last 40 years to completely unravel centuries of hard-won knowledge and advancement?

Did those who were correctly taught simply give up because it just got too hard to counter the shrill invective of ‘mob mentality’? (I ask because while on ‘public’ boards people want to be on the ‘winning side’, outside that I find people to be much more reasonable and far less didactic. Maybe when you’re ‘face to face’ with somebody it’s easier to LISTEN, on both sides, instead of trying to ‘score points’ and look good.)
I do not disagree with anything you say except for “so what happened in the last 40 years…” which I do not understand.
 
This makes absolutely 0 sense. Not to mention the notion of burning a human being alive is heinous enough. The notion of burning a human being for expressing opposing religious beliefs?? God help us all that there are people in this world who apparently still consider this anything short of horrendous and evil.
Who said anything about burning heretics alive, that’s so déclassé. You hang them first :rolleyes:

It’s not being a heretic, it’s not even discussing heresy with your friends, it is openly preaching it. To permit the slaughter of souls is very very grave and when you can’t imprison them for life…
 
I agree.** What is sad to me is that those justifying such an action give a wrong impression of Christianity/Catholicism, scare people away from the Church and push those having doubts into deciding to leave**.

Yes – I can see that happening.
 
Who said anything about burning heretics alive, that’s so déclassé. You hang them first :rolleyes:

It’s not being a heretic, it’s not even discussing heresy with your friends, it is openly preaching it. To permit the slaughter of souls is very very grave and when you can’t imprison them for life…
I already know you hold the opinion that people who preach beliefs that oppose Catholic beliefs should be burned to death.

I find this to be extremely anti Christian, and very sad.
 
I already know you hold the opinion that people who preach beliefs that oppose Catholic beliefs should be burned to death.

And as I already said, how horribly ironic and sad.
You appear to fail understand that leading someone into heresy kills their soul which people should realize is at least as bad as killing the person.
 
You appear to fail understand that leading someone into heresy kills their soul which people should realize is at least as bad as killing the person.
I don’t fail to understand anything. I understand that killing people is wrong. Period.
 
You appear to fail understand that leading someone into heresy kills their soul which people should realize is at least as bad as killing the person.

But we do not know whose soul has been killed – so you would be putting someone to death for something you do not know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top