On refutation of the Unmoved Mover

[davidv]

This is a straw-man, i didn’t say Jesus does not have a divine nature.

Jesus also had a human finite nature. Jesus was a biological organism.

Biological organisms are not identical to God. Fact! Its irrelevant that he was also a divine being.

The human biological organism is not by nature God. Fact.

Jesus as a person of the trinity is identical to the Father and the Holy Spirit and is not as such a biological organism. Saying so is only a half truth.

Since Jesus is identical to God, and
a biological organism is not identical to God

Jesus is not a biological organism. QED

 

[Linusthe2nd]

Jesus as a person of the trinity is identical to the Father and the Holy Spirit and is not as such a biological organism. Saying so is only a half truth.

Since Jesus is identical to God, and
a biological organism is not identical to God

Jesus is not a biological organism. QED

The reason Linux won’t accept the Catholic view of the Incarnate Christ is because it would involve him in a fundamental contradiction in his philosophy. He thinks creatures actually share God’s existence. He expresses it this way. The essence of a creature shares God’s own act of existence. But if that were true all creatures would actually be God.

And the Incarnation proves I am correct, because with the Incarnation God assumes a human nature ( body and soul ). Christ the man becomes God. God you see cannot be separated from His Existence or His act of existence, they are all one in the same, differing only in the way we speak of them. So in the Incarnation, we have a man assumed by God’s act of existence and becoming God. Linux cannot accept that, it would destroy his philosophy.

Linus2nd