On the Necessity of Proving Things

  • Thread starter Thread starter Image_of_God
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Indoctrination, though the most intelligent people are the most atheist. Hmm wonder why?
I would really like to see your world-wide stats on this. I am pretty sure this is just another Western ethnocentric myth you’ve bought into.

And how do you go about setting up a controlled experiment narrowing down the alleged causal factor of intelligence that is supposed to be responsible for atheistic belief, while also testing other causal factors possibly responsible for atheism such as pride, leisure, or Western materialistic cultural values? I’d like to the see actual findings of your alleged world-report.🤷

Most importantly, no respectable psychologist believes in this univocal characterization of “I.Q.” anymore. It is just as much a myth as the “phlogiston” of old.
 
I’m sorry but the two claims are NOTHING like the same. Did a man named jesus that claimed to be a god exist? Maybe. Was this man actually a ‘god’ that created our universe and everything in it? Well I’m going to need a little bit more conclusive evidence before i accept that. For you know jesus could have been Harry Houdini/David Blane type dude.

Imagine this dude walking about 2000 years ago claiming to be a god.

youtube.com/watch?v=AYxu_MQSTTY

Now lets be honest say (for the sake of argument) i give you that a person name jesus did exist 2000 years ago. What is more likely… That he was like David Blaine… or he was a super magical man, that made the universe and everything in it, and when you did your ‘soul’ will exit your body and live with him in the clouds forever?

Sorry but if you want me to believe that, I’m going to need some REALLY GOOD evidence.
sure, we call that evidence ‘Messianic Prophecy’. thats how we know Jesus was the Messiah, but that aside, the Apostles performed ‘miracles’ themselves, if they knew that their ‘miracles’ were just tricks, then why did they suffer for decades, only to be killed later for something they knew to be a just tricks?

that doesnt make sense, because i dont think blaine, copperfield or the amazing jonathon would be willing to suffer for decades, only to be murdered. simply because they liked to do sleight of hand.
 
I’m not, i am saying i reject YOUR claim. It is NOT the same thing.
you dont just reject our claim, you reject the evidence we have offered, but you dont offer counter evidence. thats what we are talking about. what evidence do you have that the evidence we present, the documentation found in the various books of the Bible, to support our claim, is wrong?

simply saying you dont believe it, is not evidence, its just a bare assertion.

so where is the evidence to support your claim that our evidence is false evidence?
 
Get a grip on your power of discernment! That’s the Old Testament, old chap. 🙂

You have an exalted opinion of your own virtue… 🙂
Ok, lets take this one at a time. So are you saying that we can discard the OT, is that the ten commandments out the window???
 
you dont just reject our claim, you reject the evidence we have offered, but you dont offer counter evidence. thats what we are talking about. what evidence do you have that the evidence we present, the documentation found in the various books of the Bible, to support our claim, is wrong?
Sorry I don’t know what to say… Why on earth would I need to offer counter evidence to reject you unfounded claims??? :confused:
 
I would really like to see your world-wide stats on this.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism#Distribution

this number is 93% among the members of the National Academy of Sciences. Expressions of positive disbelief rose from 52% to 72%.[10] (See also Relationship between religion and science.

Listen I AM NOT saying you are stupid, but face the FACTS, the more intelligent you are the more likely you are so see through religious nonsense. THAT is a FACT.
 
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism#Distribution

this number is 93% among the members of the National Academy of Sciences. Expressions of positive disbelief rose from 52% to 72%.[10] (See also Relationship between religion and science.

Listen I AM NOT saying you are stupid, but face the FACTS, the more intelligent you are the more likely you are so see through religious nonsense. THAT is a FACT.
It is amusing that you equate membership of the National Academy of Sciences with insight into the nature of reality as a whole. It is an occupational hazard of scientists to become so immersed in their line of research that they cannot see the wood for the trees. Many intellectuals lack moral integrity and the ability to co-exist with others. And if you think membership of such illustrious institutions is based primarily on merit you are blissfully unaware of human weaknesses and failings. The scientific Establishment is notorious for being a closed shop… The struggle for power and prestige is not limited to the non-academic world… But more significant than anything else is that there is also such a thing as intellectual pride. I knew a Cuban gardener who had far more wisdom than the professors I worked with…
 
this number is 93% among the members of the National Academy of Sciences. Expressions of positive disbelief rose from 52% to 72%. See also Relationship between religion and science.

Listen I AM NOT saying you are stupid, but face the FACTS, the more intelligent you are the more likely you are so see through religious nonsense. THAT is a FACT.
That wikipedia link doesn’t tell us anything at all. I know what you are trying to say, but I just don’t see any convincing stats yet to support your claim at all. I’m being dead serious too.

Here’s why:

You are claiming atheism is directly proportional to intelligence quotient. Notice that IQ measures intellectual capacity, whereas you only found a correlation between atheism and** education level ** **(or scientific CULTURE)–**so the sampling is not only biased, but also doesn’t even have to do with I.Q. at all!

We are presumably trying to find positive correlations between one’s actual intellectual **capacity **and one’s actual beliefs (or lack thereof), not between scientific culture/education level and one’s actual beliefs. That’s the evidence that we need before you can make any plausible claims about *causal *factors. A correlation between education level and atheism in the Academy of the Sciences doesn’t tell us jack.

First we need to find **proportional **relationships between ALL atheist’s and IQ, not just for those Atheists found in academia. We also need to find proportional relationships between ALL religious folk and IQ. Next, we need to control for various other factors such as education level, culture, income, family upbringing, personality. And we have to do this across cultural boundaries for the world at large, not just within Academic circles or onlyu within particular cultures. So I am quite certain if we do the job correctly that all of these factors are going to throw the positive correlation you think exists between atheism and IQ way off mark from what you expected. So let’s try to construct a really fruitful test instead of speculating, shall we?

You asked me once before what reason I had for explaining why a good majority of people lack religious beliefs in Western academia. I told you I thought it was due to pride, not an intelligence-factor. And I do thoroughly believe this because I live, eat, breathe, and sh** in academia, and I see a good selection of prideful personality types that will too often miss very critical intellectual distinctions that need to be made on what appear to be trivial matters because their other non-intellectual/social concerns will cloud their judgment.

For instance,

I see more flashy shows of pompous academic culture, rather than displays of amazing feats of intelligence. I see more people siding with various schools of thought, rather than unbiasedly taking a neutral stance with regard to pressing questions. I see academics pursuing their dog-eat-dog mentality trying to trump their opponent for a little glimpse of academic recognition, instead of partaking in a thoroughly critical examination of their own biases. So I am truly convinced that most of those in academia are no “smarter” than your average person; they are just more pedantic, arrogant, and educated.🤷 Many of them are just after a little fame, masturbation, and a means of enhancing their little intellectual egos.

First-hand experience, man. I see it both among scientists and philosophers. Don’t get me wrong. I do find many people I thoroughly respect for what they have to offer. I just don’t think academia possesses somekind of “God-like” vision everyone else outside academia lacks. This intellectual pride is precisely the weakness among intellectuals, and everyone is guilty of this, including myself.

In sum: I am convinced atheism has NO correlation with actual intelligence. I don’t have scientific evidence for this, but you don’t have evidence for the contrary position either. We need better studies. Our best option is to suspend judgment until that time.
 
I hope you are not referring to the bible? Moral, get a grip. Rape,
where did G-d command a rape?
genocide,
so what?

from G-ds point of view, death isnt permanent. the people still exist. of course we dont like it, but then we dont like punishment in general. since we are going to die anyway, beng killed early as a punishment, isnt a big deal.
homophobia,
why is that a problem? is there murderphobia, liarphobia, theifphobia, etc, because G-d says that killing, lying and stealing are immoral as well?
belief or BURN FOREVER.
so its immoral to have laws with consequences for breakinng them?

people choose to do something resulting in being imprisoned. thats just their choice. sometimes they know that they will get life in prison or even executed, and they still choose to do them.

does that make the judge, or the jury immoral? of course not.
 
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism#Distribution

this number is 93% among the members of the National Academy of Sciences. Expressions of positive disbelief rose from 52% to 72%.[10] (See also Relationship between religion and science.

what does being a member of the NAS have to do with intelligence? being a scientist doesnt take great intelligence, it takes good training. any average joe with the determination can be a scientist.
Listen I AM NOT saying you are stupid, but face the FACTS, the more intelligent you are the more likely you are so see through religious nonsense. THAT is a FACT.
 
You are claiming atheism is directly proportional to intelligence quotient. Notice that IQ measures intellectual capacity, whereas you only found a correlation between atheism and** education level ** **(or scientific CULTURE)–**so the sampling is not only biased, but also doesn’t even have to do with I.Q. at all!
Ok i will give you that and i am MORE than happy to rephrase. The more educated one is the LESS likely there are to be religious, the reason for this is obvious. God LOVES the gaps.

THINK about it…

youtube.com/watch?v=0Rqw4krMOug
 
warpspeedpetey;6396588:
LOL yeah every average joe is a member of the NAS :rolleyes:. DEAR OH DEAR!
do you think its not possible for the average man to achieve almost anything with determination? i know a lot of people in the hard sciences, and ive never really found them to be any smarter than most people, just better educated.
 
Ok i will give you that and i am MORE than happy to rephrase. The more educated one is the LESS likely there are to be religious, the reason for this is obvious. God LOVES the gaps.

THINK about it…

prove it.
 
Ok i will give you that and i am MORE than happy to rephrase. The more educated one is the LESS likely there are to be religious, the reason for this is obvious. God LOVES the gaps.

THINK about it…

youtube.com/watch?v=0Rqw4krMOug
No thanks. I need a thorough statistical study and world-wide analysis on the same grounds that I proposed earlier, before I will consider this hypothesis as even probable.

So that’s your burden to bear, AlbertBall. If you have very little, faulty, or biased evidence to support this claim, then the hypothesis is completely unacceptable for rational belief.

FYI, that video was just as a biased piece of misinformed propaganda about religion as a Jerry Falwell video would be about the science of evolution. No wonder you have an incredibly caricatured view of religion if you are constantly listening to misinformed, unintelligent, and unqualified people like that talk about religion. Quite honestly, it is sad.

You need to understand that there as just as many misinformed atheists masking as if they knew what they were talking about as there are religious folks doing the same. The propaganda runs BOTH ways.
 
Ok i will give you that and i am MORE than happy to rephrase. The more educated one is the LESS likely there are to be religious.
…and even if this correlation held in academia (which I know doesn’t hold outside of it), it would not show the alleged rationality of atheism, or even the unlikelihood of the veracity of religious belief.

All that it would show is that most people in Western academia are complete a**holes.
 
Ok i will give you that and i am MORE than happy to rephrase. The more educated one is the LESS likely there are to be religious, the reason for this is obvious. God LOVES the gaps.

THINK about it…

youtube.com/watch?v=0Rqw4krMOug
It is significant that you are less interested in the rational basis of theism than the allegedly inferior intelligence of theists! The truth is you love to fool yourself that God is a myth devised to fill the gaps in scientific knowledge! Your wishful thinking is based on faith in a blind, loveless plenipotentiary - inanimate matter - capable of producing persons with a capacity for love… 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top