S
stumbler
Guest
Careful. Shattered prejudices ahead!Mary and the saints aren’t “dead people”.
Careful. Shattered prejudices ahead!Mary and the saints aren’t “dead people”.
**Rev. 7:13 John speaks with one of the departed: "One of the elders said to me “who are these in the white robes and from where do they come?” And I said, “Lord, you know.” And he said to me, “These are the ones who have come out of the great tribulation.” John had a living relationship with the martyrs in Christ in heaven. Did John practice NECROMANCY here?Please find what praying to dead people is called in the Bible. It might change your mind about how frustrating it is to read these forums.
Maybe it is because Phil doesn’t want to encourage you from trying to change the subject… that again you dismiss an argument without addressing it at all. None of the links you provided address the issue of what the Bible calls the practice of praying to the dead.
Your links say a lot of things: they say nothing about this.
While true in many cases, it is not true in all. I grew up attending a Baptist church, and I did not witness anti-Catholicism. There were times (not very often) when Catholicism was mentioned - the instances I remember generally were about praying to saints, but the subject was not discussed at length. While many of the church may have been very anti-Catholic, anti-Catholicism was by no means injected into the congregation like a vaccine.I was taught anti-Catholicism in a Baptist Sunday School and from the pulpit for years and years as a Protestant. It’s still being taught. One can’t escape it; it’s preached, even at funerals.
…
Anti-Catholicism is shot into most Protestants like vaccine, with repeated injections; it is assimilated into one’s blood. It destroys rationality.
For the various Protestant churches to teach in the affirmative what they believe isn’t anti-Catholic, though. Where it becomes anti-Catholic is when they teach “we believe x, unlike those heathen Catholics who believe y”.My point is that many Protestants only promote “anti-Catholicism” by teaching their beliefs, which sometimes happen to differ from that of the Church.
By this logic, the unborn can be said to be not alive, because they do not yet live as we live.You are reinventing the term “death”. I suggest to you that if they are not dead, you are not alive – because you do not yet live as they live. You cannot equivocate on these terms and expect to actually form a reasonable argument.
Can you document this?He’s(Hitler) alive by your defintion – and I am sure he is in hell. I am certain he is changed and suffers eternally.
That is actually another equivoation – a redefinition of “live”. The term is used to indicate mortal human life – and is accpeted by the Apostle when he writes, “it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment.”By this logic, the unborn can be said to be not alive, because they do not yet live as we live.
Even if this is true, it doesn’t justify praying to those who now see face to face when there is no reason on Earth not to pray to Him who they see directly.No, we simply take Our Lord seriously when he says, “He is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” We simply ‘see through a glass darkly’ now. The saints see face to face.
Untrue. I am simply pointing out that your logic would preclude the unborn from being alive. If you don’t wish to accept that outcome, then you need to review your premise of what it means to live. I have considered the question that you accuse me of not considering–and reached the conclusion that physical death does not equal spiritual death.… all common definitions of life to make the saints the same as you are right now.
Even if? Come now, do you believe the words of Our Lord or not?Even if this is true, it doesn’t justify praying to those who now see face to face when there is no reason on Earth not to pray to Him who they see directly.
The issue is praying to God vs. praying to other beings.
Are you referring to Catholics engaged in evangelization, or to Protestants trying to take Catholics from the Church? I can see both readings as being plausible, but am unsure which one you mean.forward the cause of evangelizing Catholics