Once saved, always saved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter E_Thrower_II
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this passage have to do with eternal security?
**Paul is stating one can fall from grace. Christ himself teaches us this in every gospel
of the NT of Christ. The consequences are for believers. Its our choice to love God or not, he does not force us to love him, he only asks of us to follow him, abide, endure, once again faith is not just a belief on our part, its an action.

lulu**
 
What does this passage have to do with eternal security?

Where in this passage does Paul say anything about eternal security or that a saved person can lose his salvation?

Could you please share some of these verses with us?
Hebrews 10:

26 If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God…29 How much more severely do you think someone deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified them, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? …36 You need to persevere so that when you have done the will of God, you will receive what he has promised.

Note especially v36…“You will”…meaning in the future when you persevere…not “You shall” even if you do not persevere.

Romans 11:

17 If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, 18 do not consider yourself to be superior to those other branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” 20 Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but tremble. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either…22 Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off.

What do you think “You will be cut off mean”? Cut off from what?

And what does one need to do to avoid being cut off? Do you think this is needed or not…“provided that you continue in his kindness.”?
 
What does this passage have to do with eternal security?

That’s quite the accusation. Do you have any evidence to back that up? Why is it that Catholics love to tell us we’re wrong, but they never actually refute anything we say?

Do you have any examples of these alleged “contradictions”?

Well, that’s not how we determine truth, but, by your standard, all the results that are manifesting themselves are very positive ones. So what’s your point?

Where in this passage does Paul say anything about eternal security or that a saved person can lose his salvation?

Could you please share some of these verses with us?
I’ve noticed people giving many examples from Scripture and you simply brush it off by acting as if it has nothing to do with the conversation, which is making this discussion with you fruitless, even to the point of agreeing to disagree.
 
So you claim. But if it’s really pre-destination, then how can one be blotted out of what was already pre-destined?

Maybe you should have read that a little more carefully. It says they will never be blotted out of the Book of Life.

Could you please name the specific verses where “the Lord and the authors of the Bible” tell saved believers they can fall away?
As for the first point, St. Thomas Aquinas says it elequently
For the book of life is the inscription of those ordained to eternal life, to which one is directed from two sources; namely, from predestination, which direction never fails, and from grace; for whoever has grace, by this very fact becomes fitted for eternal life. This direction fails sometimes; because some are directed by possessing grace, to obtain eternal life, yet they fail to obtain it through mortal sin. Therefore those who are ordained to possess eternal life through divine predestination are written down in the book of life simply, because they are written therein to have eternal life in reality; such are never blotted out from the book of life. Those, however, who are ordained to eternal life, not through divine predestination, but through grace, are said to be written in the book of life not simply, but relatively, for they are written therein not to have eternal life in itself, but in its cause only. Yet though these latter can be said to be blotted out of the book of life, this blotting out must not be referred to God, as if God foreknew a thing, and afterwards knew it not; but to the thing known, namely, because God knows one is first ordained to eternal life, and afterwards not ordained when he falls from grace.
Now you say this
Maybe you should have read that a little more carefully. It says they will never be blotted out of the Book of Life.
I was thinking about the reference to the book of life in that passage. Do you not know that it is mentioned in the context I was referring to in other places? Citing Scripture does not seem to effect your opinion since you seem to brush off and disregard everyone who gives you good citations. Ps 69:28 is an example of blotting out of the book of life.
Could you please name the specific verses where “the Lord and the authors of the Bible” tell saved believers they can fall away?
With you I feel like Im wasting my time, but here you go

2 Peter 3:17 Therefore, dear friends, since you already know this, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of lawless men and fall from your secure position.

1 Cor 10:12 So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall!
 
COPLAND 3:
Now you say this I was thinking about the reference to the book of life in that passage. Do you not know that it is mentioned in the context I was referring to in other places?
Which Book of Life? There’s more than one, you know. What “other places”?
Citing Scripture does not seem to effect your opinion since you seem to brush off and disregard everyone who gives you good citations.
First of all, I haven’t “brushed off” anything. I’ve responded to each verse presented. The problem is that not each verse means what you’ve been told it does. For instance, somebody cited a verse, claiming it says we can lose our salvation, when salvation isn’t even mentioned in that passage. Another person cited a passage from Romans to try to show that we can lose our salvation, but the passage isn’t about our salvation, but about God’s plan to bring the Gospel to the Gentiles.

Second, if you want to talk about “brushing off”, for all of the verses I’ve cited, all I’ve gotten is “Well, that’s just your interpretation”, “You’re taking verses out of context”, and “you’re just twisting verses to make scripture contradict itself”.

How are those responses not “brushing off”?
Ps 69:28 is an example of blotting out of the book of life.
Yes…and? Like I said, there are diffierent “Books of Life” mentioned in scripture. This has nothing to do with losing salvation, but with being killed.
With you I feel like Im wasting my time, but here you go
I know exactly how you feel. I can’t help but get the feeling that, unless I fall to my knees and throw my hands around your knees and thank you for showing me the light, you’re just not interested.
2 Peter 3:17 Therefore, dear friends, since you already know this, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of lawless men and fall from your secure position.
What does this verse have to do with losing one’s salvation?
1 Cor 10:12 So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall!
Always a good idea to read the whole passage before you post a verse. This is about falling into sin because you’re overconfident in your own holiness, not about losing your salvation. In fact, the very next verse indicates that God won’t let us fall away.
I’ve noticed people giving many examples from Scripture and you simply brush it off by acting as if it has nothing to do with the conversation, which is making this discussion with you fruitless, even to the point of agreeing to disagree.
Many of the verses you’ve presented, when examined in the context of the passage and chapter they come from, have nothing to do with the loss of salvation. If you believe I’ve “brushed off” any verses you’ve presented, please tell me which ones you feel I didn’t address.

Also, why is it that any time I present a verse, you respond with the childish and intellectually lazy “Oh, well that’s just your interpretation” but then, you get mad because I don’t accept your interpretation?
40.png
pablope:
Hebrews 10:

26 If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God…29 How much more severely do you think someone deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified them, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? …36 You need to persevere so that when you have done the will of God, you will receive what he has promised.

Note especially v36…“You will”…meaning in the future when you persevere…not “You shall” even if you do not persevere.
As I pointed out to copland, it’s always a good idea to read the whole passage or chapter before you post a verse. Interesting use of ellipses, by the way. Very telling what you chose to leave out.

In this case, we see that Paul is speaking rhetorically and does not include himself or saved believers (a fact he makes clear in v 39).

He also points out that he is talking about those who live a lifestyle of willfully disobedient sin, which, of course 1 John tells us is the mark of one who is not saved in the first place.
Romans 11:
17 If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, 18 do not consider yourself to be superior to those other branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” 20 Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but tremble. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either…22 Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off.
As I pointed out before, this passage refers to God’s plan to bring the Gospel to the Gentiles, not to the loss of salvation.
40.png
lulu:
Im curious as to how you would interpret these few verses below. They are quoted by Christ himself in the NT ( Protestant ) KJB

John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.

John 14:21
He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.

John 15:10
If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.

Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

These above verses are clear, plain and simple to interpret and understand.
I agree. They’re clear, plain, and simple to interpret and understand. So what’s the problem?
 
Chuck,

** Im curious as to how you would interpret these few verses below. They are quoted by Christ himself in the NT ( Protestant ) KJB**

**John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.

John 14:21
He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.

John 15:10
If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.**

**Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

**
These above verses are clear, plain and simple to interpret and understand.Luke 8:13 They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away

The above person"heard the word", “received the word (with joy)”, “believed for a while”, but ultimately “fell away”. So we see that it is possible to begin the race, but not finish. **
Lulu**
 
,

** Im curious as to how you would interpret these few verses below. They are quoted by Christ himself in the NT ( Protestant ) KJB**

**John 14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.

John 14:21
He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.

John 15:10
If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.**

**Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

**
These above verses are clear, plain and simple to interpret and understand.Luke 8:13 They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away

The above person"heard the word", “received the word (with joy)”, “believed for a while”, but ultimately “fell away”. So we see that it is possible to begin the race, but not finish. **
Lulu**

Answers above get to my question to Chuck of what did Christ say we must do if we want to be saved? Believing in him. Yes. Keep the commandments. Yes. Forgive sins of one another. Yes. Receive him in the Eucharist. Yes. All of the above… YES
 
Answers above get to my question to Chuck of what did Christ say we must do if we want to be saved? Believing in him. Yes. Keep the commandments. Yes. Forgive sins of one another. Yes. Receive him in the Eucharist. Yes. All of the above… YES
**
I cannot believe the way they interpret scripture, not only is it unbiblical, their doctrine does not contain the teachings of Christ, it preaches Lawlessness, they mistaken the old Mosiac Laws, rituals, etc, the Law of Moses so to speak and confuse it with Gods commandments. They continue to use Romans, Gal. (Paul) cherry pic a few veses and misquote them as a way they can live rather then the way Christ has asked of us.

They seem to place grace above the most important teachings of Jesus Christ himself. It boggles my mind.! however we pray they see the true light.

Lulu**
 
I never understood how they possibly could interpret such doctrine as OSAS . Faith is an action on our part. This includes Gods commandments. And I say this as a former Lutheran

Lulu
Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but Lutherans don’t teach OSAS. We are taught that you are certainly saved, but you can abuse your God given free-will and turn away from God. “We have been saved. We are being saved. And we hope to be saved.”
 
This is about falling into sin because you’re overconfident in your own holiness, not about losing your salvation. In fact, the very next verse indicates that God won’t let us fall away.

In this case, we see that Paul is speaking rhetorically and does not include himself or saved believers (a fact he makes clear in v 39).
Chuck,

You realize your theory postulates a monsterous God who creates certain men who have no chance of salvation and with certainty will suffer the pains of hellfire with no chance at redemption?

Do you also realize that your theory makes sin irrelevent? If I am predestined to be saved, I can murder 1000 people without losing salvation.

Finally, do you realize that your theory makes the entirety of Christian witness, churches, preachers, scripture, etc. completely irrelevent? There is no point in spreading the Gospel, b/c it will not aid any person’s salvation.

If OSAS was true, a OSAS minister or preacher or apologist can’t offer anyone anything. He’s a complete waste of space. He has zero power to impact the salvation of souls. Ironically, he plays more of a role in salvation in the Catholic view than in his own, as he may lead some souls to Christ (even though his doctrine is 100% wrong).

Now, does any of that make sense given that Jesus Christ specifically set out to establish a Church, to preach to the entire world, and to administer sacraments?

Why would Christ do that if His death and Resurrection sufficed to save all the elect, and could not add any to the number of the saved?

Why did the martyrs suffer horrible deaths? They could have apostasized and been saved anyway if they were elect. What purpose does their deaths serve if they can not bring even one additional soul to Christ?

God Bless
 
Chuck,

You realize your theory postulates a monsterous God who creates certain men who have no chance of salvation and with certainty will suffer the pains of hellfire with no chance at redemption?
Actually, that would be election, not eternal security. I’m talking about the Biblical doctrine of eternal security, not election. Although, if you’d like to discuss election, start a thread and I’ll be happy to meet you there,.
Do you also realize that your theory makes sin irrelevent? If I am predestined to be saved, I can murder 1000 people without losing salvation.
But if you’re saved, why would you murder 1,000 people, particularly when 1 John says that would be a sign that you’re not saved?
Finally, do you realize that your theory makes the entirety of Christian witness, churches, preachers, scripture, etc. completely irrelevent? There is no point in spreading the Gospel, b/c it will not aid any person’s salvation.
How does it not aid anyone’s salvation? How can men be saved without the Gospel?
If OSAS was true, a OSAS minister or preacher or apologist can’t offer anyone anything. He’s a complete waste of space. He has zero power to impact the salvation of souls.
Actually, God calls him to proclaim the Gospel because men must hear and respond to the Gospel in order to be saved. But then, I guess the preaching of the cross is foolishness to them that perish.
Now, does any of that make sense given that Jesus Christ specifically set out to establish a Church, to preach to the entire world, and to administer sacraments?
No, your strawman does not make sense in that case.
Why did the martyrs suffer horrible deaths?
Because of their devotion to the Gospel.
They could have apostasized and been saved anyway if they were elect.
Except that the Bible says the elect cannot apostasize.
40.png
benjohnson:
Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but Lutherans don’t teach OSAS. We are taught that you are certainly saved, but you can abuse your God given free-will and turn away from God. “We have been saved. We are being saved. And we hope to be saved.”
Don’t tell that to Chris Rosebrough or Kim Riddlebarger. Both have devoted numerous programs to teaching the Biblical doctrine of eternal security.
40.png
lulu:
I cannot believe the way they interpret scripture, not only is it unbiblical, their doctrine does not contain the teachings of Christ, it preaches Lawlessness
You’ve made that accusation against me once before and when I asked you to explain, you could not. You’re still making accusations you can’t defend?
They continue to use Romans, Gal. (Paul) cherry pic a few veses and misquote them as a way they can live rather then the way Christ has asked of us.
So, Paul teaches us to live a different way than Christ asked us to live?
They seem to place grace above the most important teachings of Jesus Christ
Grace wasn’t an important teaching of Christ?
40.png
porknpie:
Answers above get to my question to Chuck of what did Christ say we must do if we want to be saved?
I would love to answer your question. Unfortunately, when I asked you to clarify your question in order that I may answer it accurately, you never answered.
Believing in him. Yes. Keep the commandments. Yes. Forgive sins of one another. Yes. Receive him in the Eucharist. Yes. All of the above… YES
Where does Jesus say anything about the Eucharist as a requirement to be saved?
 
But if you’re saved, why would you murder 1,000 people, particularly when 1 John says that would be a sign that you’re not saved?
God gives us the power not to sin, but He does not make us to where we do not sin, that is why John says, “if we do sin…” Are you saying that when we are saved that we will not sin or want to sin? Do you disagree with the idea that we still struggle with sinful desires, or do you think that once we are saved that we will no longer struggle with the flesh?
 
God gives us the power not to sin, but He does not make us to where we do not sin, that is why John says, “if we do sin…” Are you saying that when we are saved that we will not sin or want to sin? Do you disagree with the idea that we still struggle with sinful desires, or do you think that once we are saved that we will no longer struggle with the flesh?
Remember in your last post how you accused me of “brushing off” what you were saying?

Why are you brushing off the questions I asked you?

Yes, when we are regenerated, we recieve a new nature that no longer serves sin, Paul spells this out, among other places, in the book of Romans.

If your attitude toward sin has not changed, then you need to sit down and ask yourself why not.
 
First of all, I haven’t “brushed off” anything. I’ve responded to each verse presented. The problem is that not each verse means what you’ve been told it does. For instance, somebody cited a verse, claiming it says we can lose our salvation, when salvation isn’t even mentioned in that passage. Another person cited a passage from Romans to try to show that we can lose our salvation, but the passage isn’t about our salvation, but about God’s plan to bring the Gospel to the Gentiles.

Second, if you want to talk about “brushing off”, for all of the verses I’ve cited, all I’ve gotten is “Well, that’s just your interpretation”, “You’re taking verses out of context”, and “you’re just twisting verses to make scripture contradict itself”.

How are those responses not “brushing off”?

I know exactly how you feel. I can’t help but get the feeling that, unless I fall to my knees and throw my hands around your knees and thank you for showing me the light, you’re just not interested.
Fair enough. We both are accusing the other of misinterpreting. Its just when we both think we see the obvious, like when you ask “how’s that talking about our salvation?”, it seems quite obvious to me, and I’m sure vice-versa. But I do understand your views because I am a convert to Catholicism from Southern Baptist, and I was in ministry teaching once saved always saved. I dont know what else to do other than play the verse quoting game, which almost never leads to much.
Yes…and? Like I said, there are diffierent “Books of Life” mentioned in scripture. This has nothing to do with losing salvation, but with being killed.
Our whole understanding of the book of life is different, mine is an ancient understanding of it found in the Early Church Fathers. I understand that the word ‘book’ is a metaphor, that alone puts us in a different world of thought. One book is of those who were blotted out of the book of life, and those in the book of life are those who ended their lives in the state of grace. Its just Scripture’s way of speaking in metaphors so it can be comprehended, not that there is a couple of huge hardbound books sitting up in heaven on a bookshelf or locked up in a vault. But let us agree to disagree.
 
I would love to answer your question. Unfortunately, when I asked you to clarify your question in order that I may answer it accurately, you never answered.
Where does Jesus say anything about the Eucharist as a requirement to be saved?
Chuck, sorry I missed your question back to me. Basically pointing out that Christ’s own words say that to be saved, we must do more than believe in him.
  • receive him through the Eucharist
  • foregive one another
  • repent of our sins to one another ( confession )
  • keep the commandments
  • baptism
Regarding the Eucharist, I would refer to John 6:53 and 54. “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day”. Through the Eucharist we receive grace, grace that strengthens us to avoid sin and keep commandments.

While not in Christ’s words, but still inspired and infallible scripture, I should add that the annointing of the sick can save a person as shown in James 5.

“Is anyone among you suffering? He should pray. Is anyone in good spirits? He should sing praise. Is anyone among you sick? He should summon the presbyters of the church, and they should pray over him and anoint [him] with oil in the name of the Lord, and the prayer of faith will save the sick person, and the Lord will raise him up. If he has committed any sins, he will be forgiven.”

Do we only have to believe in him? If yes, what’s your thoughts on the other verses in Christs own words? In regards to annointing of the sick, do you believe what scripture says?

God bless!
 
Fair enough. We both are accusing the other of misinterpreting.
No, actually, I never accused you of “misinterpreting”. I don’t play that game.
But I do understand your views because I am a convert to Catholicism from Southern Baptist, and I was in ministry teaching once saved always saved.
You were in ministry and you don’t know what those passages teach?
I dont know what else to do other than play the verse quoting game, which almost never leads to much.
And therein lies the difference. When you quote verses, you believe its a game. When we do it, we believe it’s crucial to understanding doctrine and growing in Christ.
Our whole understanding of the book of life is different, mine is an ancient understanding of it found in the Early Church Fathers.
So, where do any of the ECF say there is only one Book of Life?
I’m signing off this one, you are more argumentative than care to fool with.
OK. If backing up your own claims and being held to the same standard you want to hold me to is too much for you, then you may go.
"pablope:
So, how Paul excluding himself?
In v 39, by saying “we are not” (we would include himself) a part of the people he referred to earlier in the passage.
Who are those who were sanctified?
Tose who spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace.
Actually, you may have missed this verse…13 I am talking to you Gentiles.
No, I didn’t miss it at all. It just wasn’t a part of the conversation.
So Paul is speaking to gentiles already…not a plan to bring the gospel to the gentiles.
Actually, he’s speaking to Gentiles about God’s plan to bring the Gospel to Gentiles.
Are you saying they may be cut off after they are grafted in?
If they continue to sin against the Gospel, that is, to reject the Gospel, yes.
Chuck, sorry I missed your question back to me. Basically pointing out that Christ’s own words say that to be saved, we must do more than believe in him.
  • receive him through the Eucharist
  • foregive one another
  • repent of our sins to one another ( confession )
  • keep the commandments
  • baptism
You keep saying “Christ’s own words”, but you still haven’t shown where He allegedly said these things.
Regarding the Eucharist, I would refer to John 6:53 and 54. “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day”. Through the Eucharist we receive grace, grace that strengthens us to avoid sin and keep commandments.
And what makes you think this refers to the Catholic Eucharist?
While not in Christ’s words, but still inspired and infallible scripture, I should add that the annointing of the sick can save a person as shown in James 5.
Physical healing is another topic for another thread. For now, I think you’ve got your hands full enough coming up with the verses where Jesus alleged said all of the things you claim He did.
Do we only have to believe in him? If yes, what’s your thoughts on the other verses in Christs own words?
You haven’t shown us “Christ’s own words”. You’ve shown us what you claim are “Christ’s own words”, but you still haven’t told us where in scripture we can go to see these words for ourselves.
In regards to annointing of the sick, do you believe what scripture says?
What the scripture says? Yes. What you’re implying it says? No.
 
No, actually, I never accused you of “misinterpreting”. I don’t play that game.

You were in ministry and you don’t know what those passages teach?

And therein lies the difference. When you quote verses, you believe its a game. When we do it, we believe it’s crucial to understanding doctrine and growing in Christ.

So, where do any of the ECF say there is only one Book of Life?

Oh, wait! That’s a question.
I’m signing off this one, you are more argumentative than care to fool with.
 
May peace be with all of you, we all share passion for God.

I re-iterate the importance of good works because the scriptural debate can rage on and on and we can miss the practical necessity of being good! Not to mention the tribesman who has never heard the Word, how else might he be judged but by his actions?

That said, it is not for us to presume the ‘mind’ of God beyond knowing Him through true love.

Christ’s sacrifice for humanity should never be taken for granted.

Once saved always saved reduces the entire New Testament to four very misleading words.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top