One Man's Musings

  • Thread starter Thread starter GhostMan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Again, this is the post I asked for specifics about. Grace came on, did a drive-by character assasination of me and refuses to back up her harsh words with proof.

I am saddened that this type of behavior is not called out.
 
But you have no issue with her condescending patting of my head ?(check futher in the thread)

When I wrote that post, I meant it, and I still do… I have prayed for her pain to go way…

Atfer this post I found disagreement with her posting and derailing the thread…It wasnt meant to be a personal attack.

I left when her anger with men, turned toward the mocking the Pope…
She was NOT mocking the Pope~~~~~~~ Aye Carumba!
 
I’ve been posting here for close to two years, I believe. In that time, I’ve learned a lot and been forced to consider some things that I would not have before. I’ve also developed a series of items may not be of interest to anyone else, but that confound me none-the-less.

There seems to be a strange and pervasive belief that annulment is a “get out of jail free” card; a do-over, so to speak. That saddens me. There can be nothing more sorrowful, on this side of the grave at least, than an annulment. It speaks of broken dreams and vows, hurt and pain that go far beyond the two people involved and a betrayal of the highest order. Yet, in spite of that, I often see someone post “leave him (or, much less frequently, her) and seek an annulment.” This must be the course of last attempt. Surely we are called to do everything in our power – even bearing a cross that seems too difficult for us – rather than demanding our own way and wanting to try again. An annulment should reflect badly on both parties badly enough to make it rare. Even the aggrieved party must bear some guilt for failing to properly discern the motivations of his or her spouse. Many of you will take me to task for that, but what then is the dating/courtship process about? What does God call us to do in that time?
I agree and I was someone that was totally blind when I got married. Thank God he was looking out for me and has given both my husband and I the grace to grow as the years have gone by. God surely was looking out for me because I was at it with both eyes closed. There but for the grace of God go I.

It amuses me that a post bashing men will span pages while one talking about respecting your husband dies a quick and silent death. Kudos to the ladies who posted – you have my respect.

I know in my younger years I didn’t give my husband the respect he deserved. He is one of the most awesome men I have ever met. He and I have been through the death of two of our children, are raising three with one more in the making. My love for my husband grew beyond words the day he was the only pallbearer for our infant daughter. He is truly a man!

Another thing that bothers me is the incredible standards that some women demand of men. The poll about canceling an engagement over a man who freely confessed an impure thought almost drove me over the edge. The original poster was called out be several people for potential conflict of interest and yet the posts continued. Yes, the poll was in favor of continuing, but there were enough “yes” votes to make me queasy. Surely some of the women who said yes must be capable of walking on water on command. Something about “log and speck” comes to mind.

For a people who believe that marriage is a vocation and a Sacrament, there are many who call for divorce faster that a protestant pastor with a wandering eye and a frisky church secretary.

A man who no longer believes his wife is gorgeous because she has put on weight or bears the scares of pregnancy is a pig (rightly so), while a woman who decides that she is “done with sex” is probably just tired or depressed. Hmmm.

OK, now please read this caveat: Porn is bad; it is a sin; it has no place in any man or woman’s life. It is destructive to the soul and body; it breaks down the bonds of a marriage. Now, having said that, it seems like the worst possible sin a man can commit is to watch porn. Also, any man who watches porn is (usually) abusive, possibly a child molester, controlling, destructive and not worth even being in the same room with. Re-read my initial section on Porn now before you accuse me of defending it.

I think it’s time to put porn into perspective. (See the caveat if you are getting mad at me). What if you saw a post that said:

Initial Post: My wife is a gossip and a liar. Should I leave her?
Response: Gossip is as the sin of witchcraft, she must stop. Go see a priest.
Response: If your wife is a witch she could cause your children to stumble spiritually.
Response: Witchcraft is child abuse; report your wife now and leave the house.
Response: Some witches like to dance naked in the moonlight.
Response: Your wife is obviously sleeping with other men in the nude dancing ceremonies. Get tested for VD.
Response: She might be sleeping with a priest of Satan. Get out now.

The whole idea is ludicrous, right? No more so than several posts like that I’ve seen about men and porn. (Please re-read the caveat now). Porn is a serious sin, so is gossip, so are lies, so is reading lusty novels about swarthy men. These all detract in our own lives and our marriage, but to even suggest that someone leave another person over one of them is to bitterly color the vocation of marriage.
My husband and I are both guilty of veiwing porn in your younger days. Once we figured out it was sinful we stopped. The hard part is that my husband still ends up viewing it at times because he investigates computer crime. I feel so sorry for him and pray for him all the time.

I find this post to be very honest and I am thankful! As a wife it is my job to help my husband to get to heaven wether he is doing the same for me or not. I always tell him I won’t let you drag me to hell and I will drag you as close to heaven as I can get. He thinks I am funny but I truly want the best for him and that would be heaven. My constant prayer is that someday he will be baptized and join the Catholic Chruch.
 
Grace,

You made a pretty serious accusation against me several posts ago. I asked for specific issues, can you please provide them? Otherwise, it looks like an attempt to derail a derail with a personal attack.

Thank you
Chill mate… as I see you are still breathing… And I am probably not as technical as you are so it takes me a while and I dont know how to quote a bunch of examples… but you know very well that whereas you and I started out really well we have since disagreed on some other threads too where what you perceive as an objective observation of behaviour and I observe as a biased, short-tolerance and lack of self-criticism in your posts have been the inflammatory point in question. Its always the same… me siding with women… you siding with men… the feeling on both sides of being under an unfair attack.

I am sure you recall the thread called: “Why do married men go to prostitutes?”. or how about this one: “I’m so hurt. Dh is looking at porn” ?

What I see there, as well as in this thread is a one way criticism of women… you project ill intentions into women and some comments are - perceived by me to be - highly sarcastic and in a way paranoid. When reading your posts I get the feeling that you dont think much of any woman in the world and that some personal bitterness is driving you to vent on this board.

Its not because all the things you say are only wrong… many valid points are made… but its drowned in the outpouring of negative talk that really paints women as in generel out to “get men under their boot”…
Now if that is not a serious generalization and accusation what is?
But you dont see that you do exactly what you dont like…

There is no real reason for me and you to continue this … I leave you to your thread and the discussion with the others…

Its interesting though how women defend themselves on this thread… while the men stand with you on the accusation that women bash men…
 
Ho, ho, ho! I’m not going to sit and let someone accuse me of bashing the pope! For anyone reading this, read the WHOLE sequence starting at Post #42:

Me: (sarcastically) “Maybe we’ve had this man thing all wrong. Maybe they should be held to a lower standard than women and that will do away with our need to comment on their failure to live up to God’s design for creation. In which case I’m sorry for saying anything more should be expected of them. The poor brutes really can’t help themselves. (Here follows a condescending pat on the head.)”

(See. After suggesting that GM should help elevate his fellow men to be worthy of admiration, Eagle told me that was silly. So I agreed with him. And he missed the irony of that condescending pat on the head)

So sarcastically, I contrasted the TRUE TEACHINGS OF THE HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH to the pap that was being promoted by GM and Eagle. I inserted my own sarcasm, which anyone who has read more than two of my posts and my fidelity to church teachings would recognize as sarcasm:

Our poor misguided former Pope, though, published many writings where he stated that men are the head of their own domestic churches and owed a responsibility to their families. I’m sorry I was misled by that and felt men were called to a level of leadership Ghostman doesn’t agree with. GhostMan is right, Pope John Paul II is wrong. Right?

#43 Today, 1:29 pm
23eagle23

“Our poor misguided former Pope, though, published many writings where he stated that men are the head of their own domestic churches and owed a responsibility to their families. I’m sorry I was misled by that and felt men were called to a level of leadership Ghostman doesn’t agree with. GhostMan is right, Pope John Paul II is wrong. Right?”

Your bitterness and angry I can no longer take…"
Code:
See?  :(   He missed the whole point.  That was a rhetorical question asking if GM was right and the pope wrong because Eagle seems to agree with GM.  He missed the questionmark there.  But then he perpetuated his misunderstanding into an accusation that I somehow maligned a saint.


I'll let objective readers draw their own conclusions.  I, for one, on this post, have been the voice calling men to live as Christ lived and elevate society.

Eagle called that silly.
 
Ho, ho, ho! I’m not going to sit and let someone accuse me of bashing the pope! For anyone reading this, read the WHOLE sequence starting at Post #42:

Me: (sarcastically) “Maybe we’ve had this man thing all wrong. Maybe they should be held to a lower standard than women and that will do away with our need to comment on their failure to live up to God’s design for creation. In which case I’m sorry for saying anything more should be expected of them. The poor brutes really can’t help themselves. (Here follows a condescending pat on the head.)”

(See. After suggesting that GM should help elevate his fellow men to be worthy of admiration, Eagle told me that was silly. So I agreed with him. And he missed the irony of that condescending pat on the head)

So sarcastically, I contrasted the TRUE TEACHINGS OF THE HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH to the pap that was being promoted by GM and Eagle. I inserted my own sarcasm, which anyone who has read more than two of my posts and my fidelity to church teachings would recognize as sarcasm:

Our poor misguided former Pope, though, published many writings where he stated that men are the head of their own domestic churches and owed a responsibility to their families. I’m sorry I was misled by that and felt men were called to a level of leadership Ghostman doesn’t agree with. GhostMan is right, Pope John Paul II is wrong. Right?

#43 Today, 1:29 pm
23eagle23

“Our poor misguided former Pope, though, published many writings where he stated that men are the head of their own domestic churches and owed a responsibility to their families. I’m sorry I was misled by that and felt men were called to a level of leadership Ghostman doesn’t agree with. GhostMan is right, Pope John Paul II is wrong. Right?”

Your bitterness and angry I can no longer take…"
Code:
See?  :(   He missed the whole point.  That was a rhetorical question asking if GM was right and the pope wrong because Eagle seems to agree with GM.  He missed the questionmark there.  But then he perpetuated his misunderstanding into an accusation that I somehow maligned a saint.


I'll let objective readers draw their own conclusions.  I, for one, on this post, have been the voice calling men to live as Christ lived and elevate society.

Eagle called that silly.
I read it that you were mocking the pope, after rereading, maybe not so much…

But I didnt say it was silly

“for one, on this post, have been the voice calling men to live as Christ lived and elevate society.”

I said it was silly for you to ask GM to preach to his bothers…“So GhostMan, lecture your brothers out there about their immaturity.”

and after rereading it, its still a silly statement…

I still stand by my impressions, but ask the question Grace DK ask…

From GraceDK:

Its interesting though how women defend themselves on this thread… while the men stand with you on the accusation that women bash men…

and from eagle

Why have all the men agreed with GM?
 
I can’t help but think of this almost throwaway line from Cardinal James Stafford’s article about some events surrounding Humanae Vitae.

“Not one of my professional acquaintances anticipated the crisis of trust which was just around the corner in the relations between men and women.”
I said before that it seems hard to believe that many women sometimes willingly marry men who are so bad for them. Yet I do not disbelieve the personal accounts which are so often presented, not only in these forums, but anecdotally and in a lot of news accounts. It seems clear that there are men who can be entirely deceptive in personal relationships. No matter their assurances of love, for these individuals it is always about them, and always will be about them.
Is this a new trend? Is there a spike in the numbers of these kinds of individuals? Maybe so. Maybe it’s just been overlooked in the spate of other trends such as out of wedlock births and STD rates.

The connection to Humanae Vitae is probably more than just coincidental. The new contraceptive society made the sexes playthings for each other, and especially it made women playthings for men. Many relationships start off with sex first, friendship later. It’s hard to get to really know someone when you start off with sex.

Most of us here would say we don’t use each other as playthings. Still, we are all affected by the culture, and the culture is narcissistic. Narcissism does seem more prevalent. Why grow up when you can just be entertained?

I hope it’s not a new trend but it sure seems to be.

You may see this as a stretch, but I’m even startled by the seeming connection between sex and death. I don’t mean just abortion. I often see news accounts where a husband has murdered his wife because he had a new mistress. Sexual narcissism is so strong that it leads to murder? I don’t recall seeing so many of these accounts when marriages were more stable. And there was a recent news story about an old guy who enslaved several women as sex slaves in a dungeon. He pleaded guilty at the insistence of his lawyer. He had insisted that he didn’t do anything wrong. After all, he needed sex.

Well, now the thread is entirely derailed. Sorry.
 
Ho, ho, ho! I’m not going to sit and let someone accuse me of bashing the pope! For anyone reading this, read the WHOLE sequence starting at Post #42:

Me: (sarcastically) “Maybe we’ve had this man thing all wrong. Maybe they should be held to a lower standard than women and that will do away with our need to comment on their failure to live up to God’s design for creation. In which case I’m sorry for saying anything more should be expected of them. The poor brutes really can’t help themselves. (Here follows a condescending pat on the head.)”

(See. After suggesting that GM should help elevate his fellow men to be worthy of admiration, Eagle told me that was silly. So I agreed with him. And he missed the irony of that condescending pat on the head)

So sarcastically, I contrasted the TRUE TEACHINGS OF THE HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH to the pap that was being promoted by GM and Eagle. I inserted my own sarcasm, which anyone who has read more than two of my posts and my fidelity to church teachings would recognize as sarcasm:

Our poor misguided former Pope, though, published many writings where he stated that men are the head of their own domestic churches and owed a responsibility to their families. I’m sorry I was misled by that and felt men were called to a level of leadership Ghostman doesn’t agree with. GhostMan is right, Pope John Paul II is wrong. Right?

#43 Today, 1:29 pm
23eagle23

“Our poor misguided former Pope, though, published many writings where he stated that men are the head of their own domestic churches and owed a responsibility to their families. I’m sorry I was misled by that and felt men were called to a level of leadership Ghostman doesn’t agree with. GhostMan is right, Pope John Paul II is wrong. Right?”

Your bitterness and angry I can no longer take…"
Code:
See?  :(   He missed the whole point.  That was a rhetorical question asking if GM was right and the pope wrong because Eagle seems to agree with GM.  He missed the questionmark there.  But then he perpetuated his misunderstanding into an accusation that I somehow maligned a saint.


I'll let objective readers draw their own conclusions.  I, for one, on this post, have been the voice calling men to live as Christ lived and elevate society.

Eagle called that silly.
Not to worry, I and I am sure others knew exactly what you meant in your sarcastic tone:D
 
Interesting points, Jim. I think though, that we can see ‘crimes of passion’ I think they used to be known as, as far back as Biblical times. I think it seems to be happening in epidemic proportions now, but really, it’s probably no more or less than yesteryear–just how often it’s reported with advancements in technology that we can thank for hearing/seeing it constantly either on tv, or the internet.

I think we also see a lot of threads on marriages struggling with porn problems, because porn, again thank to technology, is so easy to purchase now. I don’t even think you need to purchase it to see it on the net. Back say in the 80’s and earlier, porn could only be bought through one of those ‘sleezy’ stores–and married men would have had a hard time sneaking in a video of it into the home. Hardcore porn can be only a mouseclick and credit card number away…and stats show that porn sites have the highest ‘hit rates’ among all internet sites. So, it’s no wonder that we read a lot of threads on here about women struggling in their marriages, because their husbands are viewing porn, either occasionally or frequently.

~all that aside though~

If a particular topic title bugs you, GhostMan, just don’t open up the thread. 🤷 I know, easier said than done.😉
 
I said before that it seems hard to believe that many women sometimes willingly marry men who are so bad for them. Yet I do not disbelieve the personal accounts which are so often presented, not only in these forums, but anecdotally and in a lot of news accounts. It seems clear that there are men who can be entirely deceptive in personal relationships. No matter their assurances of love, for these individuals it is always about them, and always will be about them.
Is this a new trend? Is there a spike in the numbers of these kinds of individuals? Maybe so. Maybe it’s just been overlooked in the spate of other trends such as out of wedlock births and STD rates.
The connection to Humanae Vitae is probably more than just coincidental. The new contraceptive society made the sexes playthings for each other, and especially it made women playthings for men. Many relationships start off with sex first, friendship later. It’s hard to get to really know someone when you start off with sex.
Most of us here would say we don’t use each other as playthings. Still, we are all affected by the culture, and the culture is narcissistic. Narcissism does seem more prevalent. Why grow up when you can just be entertained
Jim, not to jump back in, because I really want to avoid some of the other men here, but perhaps you can do the heavy lifting that needs to be done in this topic and they’ll listen to a man. You are absolutely correct in the connection to Humanae Vitae. The whole birth control society, unlimited abortion, the playboy mentality and pornographic culture are all tied to sex as an activity cut off from its deepest meaning, the transition of life. Once life and responsibility are involved, immature men run off. If killing an unwanted baby is okay, why not get rid of the baby and the mother before the birth? I repeat, men are not growing up in this society. That isn’t man-bashing, anymore than to say that women have demeaned themselves by having abortions is woman bashing.

There is no societal stigma against this immaturity. Men don’t hold each other to account. Instead, the GMs and Eagles of the world agree with each other and mumble about irrational man-hating women who read pulp novels.

(Hey, guys, the men in those novels are often heroic, patient, self-sacrificing guys who save the heroine from the depredations of the narcissistic mountebanks, from what I’ve heard. Can a girl dream they’re out there? … anyone who has actually read these books can tell me if I hit the central plotline on the head. I was an English major, so I’m familiar with the genre in theory. A modern version of Chaucer’s The Knight’s Tale kind of literature.)

I agree that jumping into the bedroom first is no way to get to know someone. Here I’ll interject that this bride waited till her wedding night. But then found out there is something out there called “the virgin chaser” that loses all interest once he’s gotten what he wants. (Hide your sisters and daughters, he’s still out there looking for innocent women…) That made losing my one and only all the more painful.

But society doesn’t condemn that anymore. Because sex and love and life aren’t linked anymore. With your wife it’s the same as with a woman on the computer screen as you bond with yourself releasing endorphins that retrain your brain to become aroused by perversions, needing lower and lower depths of depravity to achieve those results as time goes on… and women who find their husbands doing that are irrational for wanting to leave? How much deeper does an insult need to go? “I can get the same satisfaction with a picture that you give me by surrendering your whole body and self and opening your own life to the creation of a new child with me.” With some men, that becomes a complete replacement of their relationship with their wives. And it opens the door to activity outside the marriage.

Women may be dumb and irrational in some people’s views, but they’re smart enough to know a grave insult when they see it. And those who minimize that are just saying to the world they don’t begin to understand what really makes women tick.

You didn’t derail the thread, Jim. Not at all. You tied it together quite nicely. The distrust and anger between men and women is all about whether or not we are being valued, a value that comes from our worth as whole people created by God. When people don’t live up to God’s plan, they have lessened themselves in the eyes of others. When they don’t treat each other as valued children of God, they lessen themselves. They can’t then demand respect.

The fundamental desire in the human heart is the love-giving desire for union, and unless it somehow gives life emotionally, spiritually or physically, it is fruitless and has been thwarted and perverted. There is no real union. And maybe that attitude has produced a generation of spiritually and emotionally stunted people who are incapable of real marriage and real relationships. God joined the love-giving and life-giving in His plan. And we hear in every wedding ceremony “What God has joined together, let no man render asunder.”

Pope John Paul II the Great said this for 26 years. His “Familiaris Consortio” is one of the most profound documents ever written on the relationship that SHOULD exist between the sexes.

How sad that men who profess to be Catholic and should exist as a light to the world, (Lumen Gentium) say it is silly that they should speak to their fellow brothers and correct their misbehavior. And when called on it, repeat that it’s still “silly.”

Eagle didn’t think it was silly that GM criticized women for denigrating men, or people getting divorces and annulments.

Why is it silly to try to make the world a more moral place by calling men out on THEIR bad behavior?

And as to the question about men agreeing with GM’s position… the few men who have come here to agree with him tell me less about his position than they tell me about themselves. Why indeed do they agree with him?

🤷

Good luck, Jim, because the sewer that is society needs a lot more like you to point out the problem and then clean it out. Maybe they’ll listen to you because then you wouldn’t be “man-bashing.”
 
And for those who like logic (not that I do, because I’m just a girl, and therefore irrational…)

Hockey players shouldn’t beat each other up during the game. It’s a poor example to the young fans of sportsmanship.

Baseball players shouldn’t take steroids. It’s illegal and it cheapens the integrity of a fine sport.

Football players who beat up women reflect poorly on the sport.

People who surf porn on the internet are wrong and bring evil into their families.

Leaving a wife and young children to find yourself and live like a bachelor is wrong.

Child molestation is wrong. It’s a hideous evil and merits the strictest of societal reprisals.

All true statements. All factual observations of disturbing societal trends that need remediation.

Who would disagree. 🤷

But some here would accuse me of man-bashing by making them.

Just because I am criticizing actions that statistically are predominantly done by men does not equal criticizing men.

It IS wrong though to compare a 40 year old woman who wears short pants in public as a moral equivalent to surfing the net for porn. THAT is faulty logic. 👍
 
Jim, not to jump back in, because I really want to avoid some of the other men here, (trust the feeling is mutual) but perhaps you can do the heavy lifting that needs to be done in this topic and they’ll listen to a man.

There is no societal stigma against this immaturity. Men don’t hold each other to account. Instead, the GMs and Eagles of the world agree with each other and mumble about irrational man-hating women who read pulp novels.

How sad that men who profess to be Catholic and should exist as a light to the world, (Lumen Gentium) say it is silly that they should speak to their fellow brothers and correct their misbehavior. And when called on it, repeat that it’s still “silly.”

Your arrogance, bitterness and angry is unbelievable,

You know nothing about me and your bias is very apparent….

and I dont “profess to be catholic” I am Catholic…

And you wonder why men feel bashed……
 
OK, now please read this caveat: Porn is bad; it is a sin; it has no place in any man or woman’s life. It is destructive to the soul and body; it breaks down the bonds of a marriage. Now, having said that, it seems like the worst possible sin a man can commit is to watch porn. Also, any man who watches porn is (usually) abusive, possibly a child molester, controlling, destructive and not worth even being in the same room with. Re-read my initial section on Porn now before you accuse me of defending it.

I think it’s time to put porn into perspective. (See the caveat if you are getting mad at me). What if you saw a post that said:

Initial Post: My wife is a gossip and a liar. Should I leave her?
Response: Gossip is as the sin of witchcraft, she must stop. Go see a priest.
Response: If your wife is a witch she could cause your children to stumble spiritually.
Response: Witchcraft is child abuse; report your wife now and leave the house.
Response: Some witches like to dance naked in the moonlight.
Response: Your wife is obviously sleeping with other men in the nude dancing ceremonies. Get tested for VD.
Response: She might be sleeping with a priest of Satan. Get out now.

The whole idea is ludicrous, right? No more so than several posts like that I’ve seen about men and porn. (Please re-read the caveat now). Porn is a serious sin, so is gossip, so are lies, so is reading lusty novels about swarthy men. These all detract in our own lives and our marriage, but to even suggest that someone leave another person over one of them is to bitterly color the vocation of marriage.
I’m the OP for the thread, “I’m so hurt. My husband is looking at porn again.” The following was GhostMan’s reply, although not in it’s entireity…
Well it’s good to see that so many people have such little respect for marriage.
He’s looking at porn - bad.
You are thinking of leaving him over it - worse. Really worse.
I never said I was thinking of leaving him, as in for good. I was considering a separation in order to give us time to reflect on the condition of our marriage. Do you really believe that separation is worse than adultery? Adultery does not have to be physical. Looking upon other women or men lustfully is adultery committed in the heart and mind of someone viewing porn. Let’s not be wishy-washy about this. Otherwise, what is the point of chastity?
You realize that marriage is sacramental, right? You realize that you are called to stay in that marriage unless some pretty heavy things happen. His watching porn doesn’t reallyy qualify.
His watching porn is very heavy in my heart. We entered into a sacramental marriage covenant fully aware of our foundation in Christ. I expect my husband to fulfill his promise to love me above all others. And viewing porn is failing at this promise miserably. It’s humiliating, and I don’t know if you understand what this does to a woman. For me it’s as if all those disgusting images he’s busy looking at is painting me right out of his mind.
I’d also like to venture that we’re only hearing one side of the story.
What is the “other side” of the story going to do? When someone’s husband is looking at porn, could it possibly be because his wife is driving him to it? If I am a gossip, do I get to blame my husband for that since he doesn’t allow me time for good adult conversation otherwise?
Now, I realize that I’m defending porn and advocating violence against women and child molestation heavy sarcasm, but I think that some of the posters here really need to think about what they’re suggesting.
Shame on you for six weeks.
Marriage is hard and sometime the other person does things that offend us. We don’t get to walk out just because they no longer are perfect. Let’s get some perspective?
I never thought he was perfect, and he never thought I was perfect. Never. Getting offended is far different from watching your spouse lust after other women. It’s not just offensive, it’s corrosive behavior that waters down the whole unitive aspect of our marriage. THAT, is my perspective.
 
Odd you highlight “irrational”.

Now I’m arrogant too? I would have settled for just angry and bitter.

But thank you. 😉

The sweet talk makes women love you!
 
But society doesn’t condemn that anymore. Because sex and love and life aren’t linked anymore. With your wife it’s the same as with a woman on the computer screen as you bond with yourself releasing endorphins that retrain your brain to become aroused by perversions, needing lower and lower depths of depravity to achieve those results as time goes on… and women who find their husbands doing that are irrational for wanting to leave? How much deeper does an insult need to go? “I can get the same satisfaction with a picture that you give me by surrendering your whole body and self and opening your own life to the creation of a new child with me.” With some men, that becomes a complete replacement of their relationship with their wives. And it opens the door to activity outside the marriage.
Women may be dumb and irrational in some people’s views, but they’re smart enough to know a grave insult when they see it. And those who minimize that are just saying to the world they don’t begin to understand what really makes women tick.
That was from my post #72.

Kittery, a lot of us understand what you are saying. Read through this whole thread. It will be very eye-opening. People who dish sarcasm can’t take it.

You are very correct in being hurt. Your husband seems to neither understand nor care about the damage he is causing.

Maybe seeing how this conversation has gone can take the sting out of GM’s post.
 
I’ve been posting here for close to two years, I believe. In that time, I’ve learned a lot and been forced to consider some things that I would not have before. I’ve also developed a series of items may not be of interest to anyone else, but that confound me none-the-less.

There seems to be a strange and pervasive belief that annulment is a “get out of jail free” card; a do-over, so to speak. That saddens me. There can be nothing more sorrowful, on this side of the grave at least, than an annulment. It speaks of broken dreams and vows, hurt and pain that go far beyond the two people involved and a betrayal of the highest order. Yet, in spite of that, I often see someone post “leave him (or, much less frequently, her) and seek an annulment.” This must be the course of last attempt. Surely we are called to do everything in our power – even bearing a cross that seems too difficult for us – rather than demanding our own way and wanting to try again. An annulment should reflect badly on both parties badly enough to make it rare. Even the aggrieved party must bear some guilt for failing to properly discern the motivations of his or her spouse. Many of you will take me to task for that, but what then is the dating/courtship process about? What does God call us to do in that time?

It amuses me that a post bashing men will span pages while one talking about respecting your husband dies a quick and silent death. Kudos to the ladies who posted – you have my respect.

Another thing that bothers me is the incredible standards that some women demand of men. The poll about canceling an engagement over a man who freely confessed an impure thought almost drove me over the edge. The original poster was called out be several people for potential conflict of interest and yet the posts continued. Yes, the poll was in favor of continuing, but there were enough “yes” votes to make me queasy. Surely some of the women who said yes must be capable of walking on water on command. Something about “log and speck” comes to mind.

For a people who believe that marriage is a vocation and a Sacrament, there are many who call for divorce faster that a protestant pastor with a wandering eye and a frisky church secretary.

A man who no longer believes his wife is gorgeous because she has put on weight or bears the scares of pregnancy is a pig (rightly so), while a woman who decides that she is “done with sex” is probably just tired or depressed. Hmmm.

OK, now please read this caveat: Porn is bad; it is a sin; it has no place in any man or woman’s life. It is destructive to the soul and body; it breaks down the bonds of a marriage. Now, having said that, it seems like the worst possible sin a man can commit is to watch porn. Also, any man who watches porn is (usually) abusive, possibly a child molester, controlling, destructive and not worth even being in the same room with. Re-read my initial section on Porn now before you accuse me of defending it.

I think it’s time to put porn into perspective. (See the caveat if you are getting mad at me). What if you saw a post that said:

Initial Post: My wife is a gossip and a liar. Should I leave her?
Response: Gossip is as the sin of witchcraft, she must stop. Go see a priest.
Response: If your wife is a witch she could cause your children to stumble spiritually.
Response: Witchcraft is child abuse; report your wife now and leave the house.
Response: Some witches like to dance naked in the moonlight.
Response: Your wife is obviously sleeping with other men in the nude dancing ceremonies. Get tested for VD.
Response: She might be sleeping with a priest of Satan. Get out now.

The whole idea is ludicrous, right? No more so than several posts like that I’ve seen about men and porn. (Please re-read the caveat now). Porn is a serious sin, so is gossip, so are lies, so is reading lusty novels about swarthy men. These all detract in our own lives and our marriage, but to even suggest that someone leave another person over one of them is to bitterly color the vocation of marriage.
I tend to agree. I don’t think any woman should ever stay with an abusive man, obviously. But I have many friends (both men and women!) who have left their marriages for pretty dumb reasons. Heck, my own parents are considering divorce even though they could certainly work things out if either one would compromise a little. My whole family is full of divorce. Both sets of grandparents and an uncle.
I have an amazing husband and I admit I don’t treat him right at all. He is infinitely patient and giving. I’m impatient and I often snap at him just cause I’m tired or cranky when things aren’t his fault. He is so good to me. Is he perfect? No. He’s a total and utter slob (but I knew that when I married him and decided everything else about him made up for it, so I don’t get to complain 😛 ). My behaviours towards him are much worse than dirty clothes left on the floor. In many relationships women feel that it is their right to nag their husband. If she wants to go out with her pals it’s a well deserved break. If he wants to go out with the guys he’s being immature. (I really agree with Dr. Laura’s book The Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands… honestly I do everything wrong according to her book and she’s right! It’s really made me take a good look at my apalling behaviour and realize that I need to treat my DH with more respect and care!)
Anyways, I think in most cases of occaisionally porn slip ups, it is just an occaisional porn slip up. I don’t think porn is the same as cheating. It is wrong, but it is not at the same level. I would be sad if my DH looked at porn, but I do hurtful and immoral things too. And if I decided to deny my DH marital relations all the time he would have every right to feel upset! I would be upset too if he turned me down all the time…

Anyways, I know in my relationship I am lucky. I don’t doubt the case is reversed in many other relationships where the woman is the more patient giving one. I think men and women both need to treat eachother with more respect. I don’t think we should play one against the other. Some men are pigs, some women are pigs. We should play good people against the pigs!

Okay, that was probably the least eloquent bit of writing I’ve typed up yet (with the possible exception of inane college essays written at 2am) My apologies 😊
 
I’m going to stick my nose in again.

Yes, my name is Pro-Life_Teen, I am 18 and don’t have all the worldly knowledge that you lot have.

But y’all are acting like kids. Some of you have fallen to name-calling [eloquent that] and others have missed the point of the thread.

Yes, porn is bad. No one here is advocating it at all. But lots of the threads here are ridiculous. In an emotionally unstable state someone writes 3 paragraphs about their significant other, and for 5 pages or more we condemn them. We offer our stories- our perhaps terrible stories, assuming that it’s the same tale.

Kittery, I’m sorry about what’s going on in your homelife right now. You have done nothing wrong. Yes, it hurts, yes it feels like it may be your fault, yes it’s a betrayal. But you’re in a Sacramental marriage in Christ. It’ll be alright; don’t be afraid. Jesus has asked us to trust in Him, and to not fear. We’re never given more than we can handle. 🙂

There is a great deal of bashing to whoever doesn’t write the thread. A woman write something about her husband being online, her husband is obviously choosing porn over his family and isn’t capable of being the head anymore. A man writes a thread and yes, either his wife is tired or has a problem [she’s never having an affair. A woman writes that her husband isn’t attentive and I bet people will assume affair]. Though there was that one time that a man wrote about his wife not wishing to have sex with him. I was about 14, this was a thread from years ago. People advocated divorce. So yes, while there is a gender bias in a sad attempt at reverse sexism, we just don’t like the person that hasn’t had their side revealed.

I’ve read this. I’m a woman, I’m siding with the guys. I’ve had enough of people asking strangers online should they break off their engagement over stupid things.

And the best I’ll mention now. A man started a thread that he’d messed up. Gone to a hotel room with someone not his fiancee, didn’t have sex that I can recall, but he’d messed up. He was horribly sorry, the story made me very sad. Lots of you advocated he go to Confession and clear it all up.

But then the fiancee started a thread. She talked about her side. And people sided with her. They didn’t bother to read how sorry and how horrible her husband-to-be felt, no. They just told her to postpone the wedding or to break it off.

People on this forums are bias. Their judgement is clouded by their own misfortune and some of them refuse to believe that a man who has messed up, or a woman who has walked off the path, are good. Whatever happened to all of His teachings on forgivenes? What happened?

What happened, for that matter, to discussing this with your spouses. Why go online and in an emotionally unstable state write about your husband’s problems for the eyes of others? You and he are one flesh, one soul. If one half of you was sick you’d see a doctor right away. Your liver and kidney’s are failing you don’t sit around complaining to your neighbor.

And your neighbor, should he be listening, shouldn’t be saying that well, your liver and kidneys suck. We shouldn’t be bashing the significant other of anyone- because in that regard we’re hurting the person. And we’re also hurting a child of God. A person made in His image and likeness.

I was taught in kindergarden that everyone is Christ and should we hurt anyone, we hurt Him.

… now for a disclaimer: No, of course I’m not advocating staying with someone who is properly abusive, or actually hurtful to you, children, or themselves. I strongly advocate getting help.
But people want answers sometimes, so they write asking for help. And being told by several people on a Catholic forums that they should leave might be enough to get them to do that. Whenever we write here, we have a certain authority. We are Catholics and people trust our views to be the Church’s views, or so I believe.
 
Prol-Life Teen:
Yeah, I don’t much like being called names myself, but I’m used to it. 😉 At least this guy didn’t call me the F-ing B word.
But people want answers sometimes, so they write asking for help. And being told by several people on a Catholic forums that they should leave might be enough to get them to do that. Whenever we write here, we have a certain authority. We are Catholics and people trust our views to be the Church’s views, or so I believe.
There is much wisdom to what you write. I always try to keep in mind that someone will actually take my advice. I don’t give it lightly. You won’t find me on financial forums or housebuilding topics. Too many people gave me bad advice when I was being torn apart by my xh. Or the advice they gave me didn’t help me to see the situation as it really was. I paid a dear price for that. The people, in retrospect who gave me the best advice in my situation are the ones who had been in it themselves.

I do know what constitutes a good marriage and what constitutes a bad one. In a perfect world a husband and wife truly are one flesh. But if they don’t really have a marriage, they aren’t. And no amount of wishful thinking can make it so. And it takes two people to make it so, not one person trying and crying and worrying and begging and another one taking refuge behind closed doors with a computer or something.

Often the fact of whether there really was a marriage with two united as one flesh can only be determined after it has all crashed and burned. Looking through the wreckage, canon lawyers trace what should have been there and make the best decision whether or not the facts support a real marriage, real consent, and a real intent of purpose on both spouses to have a marriage that is exclusive, permanent, and open to children. It’s like a plane crash that the NTSB picks through to find out that the plane never should have taken off to begin with.

Everyone marries happily, hoping they have these things, and maybe even believing it. And events unfold, often messily, in peoples’ lives to show that maybe their hope was not founded on reality. Full consent of the will was lacking, emotional capacity was absent, belief in the permanence and fidelity of marriage was lacking. Some secretly have no intent at all to have children.

What you see here is how some of that realization plays out over time as people struggle with realizations about the person they married. I can assure you by the time people come here with a problem most of them have probably agonized for years over it as it built up and some of it we’ve read the history of and so the information we give isn’t in a vacuum. Some have had spouses that told them they were crazy, or making mountains out of molehills or it was all in their heads.

It’s tragic. Many times children are involved. By the time someone is coming to a board of strangers to present a case, they are just looking for objective outside validation from people who have no dog in the fight to affirm their deepest instincts about a situation, to be told “No, you’re not crazy to feel that way. Sane people wouldn’t put up with this attitude from a spouse or fiancee.”

Or they’re hoping to be told, “Yes, your instincts are correct that this is sufficiently serious that others would pause too.”

They’ve already had that argument with themselves over and over. Many have gone to priests and professionals. They come here for some kind of validation, the same kind that our judicial system uses when it picks 12 people and puts them on a jury… that the common sense of a group of impartial people will arrive at the truth.

I hope you never in your life are in such a situation that you are reduced to asking strangers to tell you you are not crazy. You are young and haven’t experienced a lot of what people here have. Would to God you never endure what I did. I had no idea when I was 18 how things would go. It’s good I didn’t. The only thing that has gotten me through is my faith and my family. (Males and females!)

The point of the original thread was one man coming to register his discontent that the women here seem to call men out on bad behavior and people get too many divorces and annulments.

The thread has not been derailed so much as examined, expanded upon and put in a larger context of how society and certain immoral behaviors have coarsened people and reduced the ability of people to view each other with respect and dignity. He is mad that people just didn’t agree with him and let it go at that.

Some of us used personal anecdotes to illustrate that. May you never have personal accounts in your life about how porn systematically broke down an important relationship. Sometimes it goes beyond forgiving. How many times do you let your husband beat you up, accept the flowers and the half-hearted apology (which eventually stops) before you realize that forgiving him is going to get you maimed or killed someday? When your husband threatens to kill you, do you forgive that? Or the woman whose husband repeatedly breaks all promises and sneaks online and views porn… at what point is her ability to trust him so broken that the marriage is unendurable? Marriage requires a LOT of trust. Without it, living in the same house is impossible. Respect is impossible. Which makes love almost impossible. Especially if the porn viewing is accompanied by lots of other behaviors that indicate a lack of respect for the wife.

Yes, sometimes it really feels like we’re given more than we can handle. If someone is thinking of breaking off an engagement, it’s probably not really over a stupid thing. It’s probably over the sum total of a lot of little things that make them wonder.

I know how I would have viewed some of these things when I was 20. My view of them now, decades later, is colored not only by my annullment, but by years of friends and relatives and their experiences, and seeing lots of stories, people coping with spousal abuse, alcoholism, drug abuse, infidelity, and mental issues. I don’t feel comfortable relaying their stories, so I only tell my own.

Realizations about patterns of human behavior occur over the years. I too would have said the woman with the fiance in the hotel room should have forgiven him when I was your age. Now, in hindsight, I would have been among those suggesting she postpone the wedding. Because now I know that no matter how sorry he was, he wasn’t ready for the permanence and exclusivity of marriage. People who “accidentally” mess up like that are often lying to themselves most of all. It’s really not an accident, but his subconscious desire to be free coming out. The truth often comes out in messy ways. Men who really want to get married don’t put themselves in that situation or find themselves in that situation. More is going on there. Do you suggest they rush into a marriage with such questions hanging over their heads? That is the exact kind of information tribunal asks for when they question any incidents that “occurred during the dating, engagement period, wedding, or immediately after the wedding” that could cast doubt on the person’s ability or resolve to maintain an exclusive marriage bond.

If that woman married that man and he later turned out to have a problem finding himself in hotel rooms with women not his wife, no matter how sorry he was, some here would have pilloried her for not looking at him closely enough and determining what kind of person he was before they married! Reread this thread!

Our judgment here is also clouded by our joys. But nobody asks us if they should marry the guy that spent all summer mowing our aged parents’ lawn for free, or how many diamonds they should put on the bracelet for the wife who just gave birth to their child after postponing cancer treatment so the baby wouldn’t be hurt.

You are only seeing the problems here.

If someone’s marriage is at the point they can’t talk to their spouse anymore (as you’ve seen, some spouses refuse to talk at all), then they’re often desperate to talk to someone.

Watch and learn from other people’s mistakes. You show a lot of wisdom, but some wisdom can only be gained through experience. I hope all your experiences are good ones. 👍 But as you grow older you’ll realize how common many experiences really are. It’s like a movie… you can predict how some end very easily. Sometimes the only way disaster can be averted is with deep spiritual conversion. And what is often lacking from horror tales here is that the spouse causing the problems is a person of deep prayer or frequents the sacraments. THAT is what often makes the situation truly hopeless. 😦
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top