one truth per doctrine, or multiple truths...

  • Thread starter Thread starter joe370
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

joe370

Guest
A question for my protestant brothers and sisters in Christ who are sola scriptura advocates:

Can there be only one truth regarding any one teaching, in the holy Bible?
 
There is one truth but we may not be capable of fully understanding it. After all God and His ways are beyond our comprehension. Also I don’t believe it is necessary to know every possible truth. In other words I think that too many doctrines have been defined as necessary. As an extreme example we could assert a doctrine about the colour of Jesus’ eyes and someone would be right and others wrong. But is it necessary to know this?
 
There is one truth but we may not be capable of fully understanding it.

Jesus said to His fledgling apostolic church: "I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear. 13But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. 14He will bring glory to me by taking from what is mine and making it known to you. 15All that belongs to the Father is mine. That is why I said the Spirit will take from what is mine and make it known to you.

Truth, (at least truth made known to the fledgling church built on the apostles and prophets) - can be fully understood.
After all God and His ways are beyond our comprehension.
I agree that Jesus’ eye color is unnecessary. I am talking about essential truths, such the Eucharist (literal vs symbolic) - Baptism (water baptism vs no water) etc. etc.
 
I agree that Jesus’ eye color is unnecessary. I am talking about essential truths, such the Eucharist (literal vs symbolic) - Baptism (water baptism vs no water) etc. etc.
What are the essential truths and why? Which don’t matter?
 
What are the essential truths and why? Which don’t matter?
When I say essentials I am simply using language often employed by many non-Catholics. What I really mean is all truth revealed by Jesus to His Church by the holy spirit.
 
I agree that Jesus’ eye color is unnecessary. I am talking about essential truths, such the Eucharist (literal vs symbolic) - Baptism (water baptism vs no water) etc. etc.
We think it is necessary to know these things but is it? Jesus told us to be baptized. What is important is that we are baptized. God will do His will in it whether we understand or not. Similarly, Jesus told us to eat the bread and drink the wine. If we do this God will accomplish His will through it whether we understand it or not. I think that it is with good reason that the early church referred to the sacraments as mysteries. We have tried to take the mystery out of everything because of our innate belief that we can and should know and understand everything. To me, this is the narrow path, not over-complicating the Gospel.
 
We think it is necessary to know these things but is it? Jesus told us to be baptized. What is important is that we are baptized. God will do His will in it whether we understand or not. Similarly, Jesus told us to eat the bread and drink the wine. If we do this God will accomplish His will through it whether we understand it or not. I think that it is with good reason that the early church referred to the sacraments as mysteries. We have tried to take the mystery out of everything because of our innate belief that we can and should know and understand everything. To me, this is the narrow path, not over-complicating the Gospel.
Jesus said, “I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you” (John 6:53). Do you believe him? I don’t think this applies to people who are oblivious to this truth! If I don’t have to do this, then maybe my sister is right and we don’t have to be baptized in a church either? She too would say: God will do His will in it whether we understand or not. Will God do His will in it whether we do what he commanded or not?

The CC doesn’t claim to know how the change takes place,they simply believe that it happens. Like I said at the other thread, we know what happens (according to Paul) - when we eat the bread unworthily.
 
Carl, if I start a church tomorrow and do away with baptism by water, and you tell me that that is OK, then truth regarding Jesus’ baptismal teaching is irrelevant, and many churches teach this. If you say that it is not OK, then what does that say about all those churches that teach that it is OK?

Why do you think there are so many separated churches today with different beliefs?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top