Single Volume Biblical Commentaries to consider:
The
Haydock Commentaries are excellent.
The *Navarre Expanded New Testament *
Ignatius Study Bible New Testament
The
Catholic Scripture Study International Bible is very good, but a bit shorter in terms of study notes. Its more of a beginner’s study Bible. It would be great for those who are just looking to read Scripture and for some basic commentary to go along with it.
I would personally avoid the
New Jerome Biblical Commentary unless you are really interested in the historical-critical method of analysis and enjoy reading commentary which comes from a position of skepticism. In addition, I would stay away from the
Little Rock Study Bible as well. It relies almost exclusively on the historical-critical method also and includes commentary from theologians who openly dissent from the Faith.
I should add also that the historical-critical method does have some value and the Bible can be looked at through that method, but that is only one way that the Church stipulates that Bible commentaries are to be done. The four ways to look at Scripture from the ancient Church are as follows:
- Literal (historical)
- Allegorical
- Moral/Tropological
- Anagogical/Eschatological
These four senses are often attributed to Greogory the Great, but actually go back to St. John Cassian and probably even further than that, to the Desert Fathers in the Egyptian Monastic Tradition.
Unfortunately, this focus only on the Historical-Critical method often takes the position of Sacred Scripture being written in a manner that it wasn’t. For example, the Church has stated officially that Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch is to be affirmed. The Historical-Critical method often does not acknowledge this. These issues exist throughout this text. The Historical-Critical method became the focus following the rise of the Protestant heresies, and became widely used prior to and following WWII from Lutheran theologians who wished to cast doubt upon the veracity of the Old Testament, in particular Mosaic authorship. Do yourself a favor sometime and checkout where the ideas of the different “traditions” of OT authorship were first written about. Hint, it isn’t the Catholic Church, or even the Orthodox Churches.
Pope Benedict also stated, more than once, that Catholics can seek value in the Historical-Critical Method, but are not to focus on that solely or to the exclusion of other methods of Scripture interpretation and commentary.