H
haroldcrews
Guest
Does the Trinity show that ‘Being’ is relational? Further what are the implications if it does?
What can be more fundamental than the nature of God?Thanks Tony. I appreciate your response though a more fundamental response was more what I was looking for. You are on the right track when it comes to the effect of sin and the nature of Hell.
Another aspect worth considering is the Blessed Mother being Daughter of the Father, Mother of the Son and Spouse of the Holy Spirit exists in far greater relation to God than we. She truly is Full of Grace.
Harold, I forgot to compliment you for your neat and delightful summary of Our Lady’s relationships…Thanks Tony. I appreciate your response though a more fundamental response was more what I was looking for. You are on the right track when it comes to the effect of sin and the nature of Hell.
Another aspect worth considering is the Blessed Mother being Daughter of the Father, Mother of the Son and Spouse of the Holy Spirit exists in far greater relation to God than we. She truly is Full of Grace.
Exactly; although we have an ontological continuity with God as the source of being and are thus all ontologically connected hell is not the destruction of this ontology for without the being given by God we simply cease to exist - we are held in existence by the will of God at all times. However, it is well worth remembering that when we talk about God and ontology we are talking about God who is the source of being but beyond being; being is not the sum of the divine but rather finds its source in the divine and is wilfully given from it. What is not given by nature of being is an epistemological continuity with God - that is bestowed supernaturally by grace in view of the merits won for us by Christ. Christ can be found in all things and thus we can know something of God from the creation itself but we can only come to know him fully by being fully one with Christ who is the image of the invisible God. Hell is not an absence of ontology because without a given ‘beingness’ from God we do not exist at all - rather hell is the total (and freely chosen) depravation of all epistemological continuity with the Godhead.Solitary confinement is the worst punishment that can be inflicted on us because it interferes with our social life. Yet even then we can still be united to others by love. A far worse punishment is interior isolation caused by pride and selfishness. Hell is simply the self-inflicted absence of contact with God.
Most eloquently expressed! Even your typo is appropriate because to be depraved is to be deprived of God (through one’s own fault).Exactly; although we have an ontological continuity with God as the source of being and are thus all ontologically connected hell is not the destruction of this ontology for without the being given by God we simply cease to exist - we are held in existence by the will of God at all times. However, it is well worth remembering that when we talk about God and ontology we are talking about God who is the source of being but beyond being; being is not the sum of the divine but rather finds its source in the divine and is wilfully given from it. What is not given by nature of being is an epistemological continuity with God - that is bestowed supernaturally by grace in view of the merits won for us by Christ. Christ can be found in all things and thus we can know something of God from the creation itself but we can only come to know him fully by being fully one with Christ who is the image of the invisible God. Hell is not an absence of ontology because without a given ‘beingness’ from God we do not exist at all - rather hell is the total (and freely chosen) depravation of all epistemological continuity with the Godhead.