V
Vonsalza
Guest
Sure. I know people who had aneuryisms and lived. I know people who had motorcycle accidents and died. They were organ donors and were kept on life support long enough to harvest their organs, but even though their body was artificially alive, “they” were not there anymore. I want to say that particular motorcycle fatality that I’m thinking about benefited about 23 different people.
But there’s nowhere on the form that says, “Okay, under these circumstances, I think I’ll be too far gone, so go ahead and help yourselves; but under those circumstances, I’d really like to have a fighting chance to come back.”
Because statistically, how many of us die from something like head trauma or an aneurysm? It’s like, 1% of the population. Now compare that to how many people die of something like failure of the heart/the circulation/the respiratory system? And you know how fast organs deteriorate under those circumstances.
Sure, ergo part of the debate.omitted for brevity
Those 1% situations occur in everything and we have to make calls as to whether they’re egregious enough to damn the whole situation that gives rise to them.
The fact that very real good comes about as a result makes the decision that much more difficult (or easy) for some.