G
Giannawannabe
Guest
Okay here’s a little bit about what I didn’t like:
God Bless
Giannawannabe
- Although teachers claimed there would be no instruction regarding sexual intercourse, the film very graphically showed a penis erecting and that it delivers semen into the vagina (which had just been graphically shown) and called it “sexual intercourse”. When a mom questioned this, saying I thought you didn’t talk about sexual intercourse, the teacher said “yeah, but it goes over their heads”. What??? Much of the worksheets show man/woman parts and they must label them. There was a game (done in boy/girl combined class) where they take cards labeled with male/female parts (i.e scrotum) and the kids needed to work in groups and place the cards in the correct male/female category.2) Two whole classes dealing with HIV/AIDS–risk/no risk behavior. The whole idea was to teach “tolerance” towards these people…making it seem that most people get HIV/AIDS through no fault of their own. I know that, of course, there are situations where that is true. However, being in the medical field, I’ve NEVER had an AIDS patient where they “caught” it by playing “blood brothers” with a friend.3) The teachers CLEARLY indicated that they did not feel that kids should be opted out. When I asked if they could be opted out of only some of the classes, I was told no. It was all or nothing. What??? There was one class, I was not too offended by that talked about puberty (the class was one where boy/girl were separated). But no. My kid can’t opt in on the ones I think are less offensive. 4) The teacher actually stated that she had 4 parents take their kids out last year because they didn’t want them to see “this stuff” and that she did not agree. She thought it was “awful” that they would not choose to educate their kids. How does she know? Maybe the parents did it in their own way. She did not have respect for parents’ decision. She actually told my friend that she needed to “get over” the fact that my friend thought combined boy/girl classes would encourage giggling and such. The teacher said that just didn’t happen “these days”. It was condescending toward my friend who is just concerned that her child will be given info that she is not comfortable with. SHE is the parent and she has the right to question/query these teachers.5) Although teachers stressed the importance of parental involvement and said they “always” defer to parents, the film showed a little girl starting her period. She went to her SISTER, not mom. She told her sister NOT to tell her mom about it. The mom was NEVER brought into it. I didn’t question this, but I think I will call the teacher and bring this up. The sister did not tell the girl to talk to “mom” or anything. The sister told the girl that she shouldn’t have sex now, even though she started her period, but when she’s “more mature”. Whatever that means. I think most 10/11 year olds think that they are “mature”. She could have at least said when the girl becomes an “adult”.
God Bless
Giannawannabe