CSN,
While I was looking for a more Catholic-friendly alternative to GS a few years ago, there were some women promoting a Regnum Christi youth group at our parish. While I was originally enthusiastic, I became less so the more I found out about Regnum Christi. After a lot of research and quite a few unpleasant encounters, I began to actively encourage anyone who is interested in Regnum Christi to thoroughly investigate it before becoming involved. You should look at both
regainnetwork.org, and
legionaryfacts.org (
lcfacts.org, maybe?). You should talk to former members, including happy former members and unhappy former members and then decide. There are a lot of people who disagree with me, and many who agree. I fully support Archbishop O’Brien’s demands of the LC/RC, especially the ban on spiritual direction of minors; I have heard too many complaints about the 3gf’s SD from people I trust to think it’s a good idea. My suspicion is that the SD problems in RC (especially high pressure to commit without parents’ knowledge or permission) is part of their MO.
Opus Dei also has some SD of minors by nonpriests (or at least, it did when my friend was growing up OD). Since OD is much larger than LC/RC, and appears to have fewer complaints about excessive pressure (at least, to my limited knowledge), I find it plausible that when minors are subject to excessive pressure to commit to OD, it’s individual abuse of SD. In any case, I think it’s best to leave SD to priests, especially for minors; most kids just need a good usual confessor. I haven’t read much from ODAN, since I haven’t had problems with OD, but it would probably be useful to hear what the complaints are, and how widespread they are.
I get the impression that money is very important to both LC and OD, which is a turnoff for me. Also, my OD friend gets very annoyed with Matthew 20, another turnoff since that’s one of my favorite Bible passages (along with John 6 and 1 Samuel:5-6

).
As to the founders: the LC/RC’s founder’s life is well-known at this point, and he is very unlikely to be canonized, IMO. Josemaria Escriva was canonized during the time when JPII had loosened the requirements; in time, if many more miracles are attributed to St. Escriva’s intercession, I’m sure he’ll lose the Roger Maris-like asterisk next to his name. In January, while Marcial Maciel was on his deathbed, a cardinal said in an interview that the enthusiasm of a founder’s followers would no longer be enough for canonization, and that the former, stricter requirements for the process had been reinstated as of Benedict XVI’s assuming the office. I’ve drawn some conclusions from this. Join me or don’t.