Ordaining Female Catholic Priests

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahimsa
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This issue of women becoming Priests is mainly due to individuals viewing it from a strictly secular point of view, judging the Church’s position by those same secular opinions that are more political than spiritual. The RCC is not a secular or political entity. It never has been and never will be. It’s a spiritual institution created by God.

As far as the roles of men or women in the Church goes, they’re different because God created men and women to be different. He assigned them separate roles in every aspect of life, including the spiritual way of life. Why is that so hard to grasp? The closer we get to God, spiritually, the more we begin to understand what our roles are and why God set them up as He did. There is a Divine purpose, that only He knows, for it to be that way. He is the only one that can explain it, fully. Our duty as Catholics is to faithfully accept what the Church teaches and follow it, because it’s the truth that was revealed to us by Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit, for the benefit of us all. It is God’s Will for it to be like this. It’s not our place to question Him.

The position of a Priest can’t be reduced to a secular ‘job description’ in any way, as if the Church was a corporation in the business of spreading its religious views, as a commercial service. It’s entirely different. The Priesthood is a spiritual position that was established by God. He set down the requirements, and the rules governing it, Himself. He is the only One that could ever change it. Since God never changes, the possibility of that ever happening are slim to none.

Humility is a virtue that we all should have learned from when God decided to lower Himself from the Heavens in order to live as Jesus, the man. His Priests are a true reflection of Him that has been left for us to have a physical example of Him, ever-present to us in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. No woman in the world can ever fill that spiritual or physical role. It has not been granted to us by God. It’s a position that was reserved for men, only. We need to humbly accept our own roles in life, just as Jesus humbly accepted His role on earth.

I’d like to comment on a few other things said in previous posts. I’d really love to refute them all, in their entirety, but that would probably require at least a week’s worth of writing, and a dozen lengthy posts, to address all of my points of contention with some of what’s been said.

SecretGarden: I don’t know where you got some of your information, but you might want to read something that’s more historically accurate, and not take ‘facts’ or ideas from fictional books like The DaVinci Code, or from those who believe Jesus was secretly married to Mary Magdalen. Mary, the “Apostle’s Apostle”, was probably a reference to Jesus’ Mother Mary, not Mary Magdalen as so many people erroneously allege. The Blessed Mother is the one that the Apostles went to for advice after the Ascension. His Mother was always the one that was closest to His Heart. She was never actually separated from Him, at all. They were always joined, mystically, and the Apostles knew it.

Mary Magdalen was one of the holy women mentioned in the Gospels. Those women, along with the Holy Mother, did everything they could to spread the Gospel, by helping the Apostles. They weren’t any less important than the men. They were just different, but, they certainly never had any ambition to become Apostles, or to preach. That role was always reserved for men. They understood that, and it didn’t bother them in the least. They had enough to do. They knew they were doing exactly what Jesus wanted them to do, just as they’d been doing from the time He began His public ministry. They also followed Him from the very beginning, along with the Apostles. Please don’t dismiss their role, or that of women in the Church today, as if they were unimportant. Those roles may have evolved, but haven’t really changed that much.

Luke 10 said:
[38]
Now it came to pass as they went, that he entered into a certain town: and a certain woman named Martha, received him into her house. [39] And she had a sister called Mary, who sitting also at the Lord’s feet, heard his word. [40] But Martha was busy about much serving. Who stood and said: Lord, hast thou no care that my sister hath left me alone to serve? speak to her therefore, that she help me.

[41] And the Lord answering, said to her: Martha, Martha, thou art careful, and art troubled about many things: [42] But one thing is necessary. Mary hath chosen the best part, which shall not be taken away from her.

Mary Magdalen was a perfect example for contemplative nuns. They give up their own lives in order to dedicate themselves to God’s holy work in His Church. I don’t know if some of you who are so offended by modern women’s roles are aware of this, but nuns aren’t just a bunch of women that are forced to just sit around praying all day, because the Church won’t allow them to do anything ‘better’ than that. But, many nun’s vows are a wedding vow. They’re actually married to Jesus Christ. They even wear a wedding band on their right hand, that indicates that they are married to Jesus, and serve Him alone. That’s not special?

Some are a lot like Martha. They busy themselves doing all kinds of important things for the Church. But, the ‘best’ are those like Mary Magdalen, who chose the ‘best part’ as a contemplative. Even Jesus showed us that prayer is very important for the whole world, and for the Church. Anyone that believes that women have been given an unfair or unequal role in the Church of any era, is completely ignorant of the great admiration and love that Jesus has always showed for all women’s roles, including those of us that are simply called to be wives and mothers. We all have our own parts, and they’re all different.

BTW (aka By The Way), for those who asked… “TYVM” does, indeed, mean “Thank You Very Much”! 😃
 
SecretGarden: I don’t know where you got some of your information, but you might want to read something that’s more historically accurate, and not take ‘facts’ or ideas from fictional books like The DaVinci Code, or from those who believe Jesus was secretly married to Mary Magdalen. Mary, the “Apostle’s Apostle”, was probably a reference to Jesus’ Mother Mary, not Mary Magdalen as so many people erroneously allege. The Blessed Mother is the one that the Apostles went to for advice after the Ascension. His Mother was always the one that was closest to His Heart. She was never actually separated from Him, at all. They were always joined, mystically, and the Apostles knew it.

Mary Magdalen was one of the holy women mentioned in the Gospels. Those women, along with the Holy Mother, did everything they could to spread the Gospel, by helping the Apostles. They weren’t any less important than the men. They were just different, but, they certainly never had any ambition to become Apostles, or to preach. That role was always reserved for men. They understood that, and it didn’t bother them in the least. They had enough to do. They knew they were doing exactly what Jesus wanted them to do, just as they’d been doing from the time He began His public ministry. They also followed Him from the very beginning, along with the Apostles. Please don’t dismiss their role, or that of the women in the Church today, as if they were unimportant. Those roles may have evolved, but haven’t really changed that much.
Mary Magdalen was a perfect example for contemplative nuns. They give up their own lives in order to dedicate themselves to God’s holy work in His Church. I don’t know if some of you who are so offended by modern women’s roles are aware of this, but nuns aren’t just a bunch of women that are forced to just sit around praying all day, because the Church won’t allow them to do anything ‘better’ than that. But, many nun’s vows are a wedding vow. They’re actually married to Jesus Christ. They even wear a wedding band on their right hand, that indicates that they are married to Jesus, and serve Him alone. That’s not special?
You made some valid points but please do not think that I was crazy enough to take my information from Dan Brown’s “The DaVinci Code.” I might be new to the denomination but I have been a Christian for years therefore I know where not to get my information from. The book I got it from was written by a a well known scholar, the name I don’t have with me. I know that “The DaVinci Code” is a wonderful piece of fiction, but that is as far as it goes. Anyone who goes to that book for fact needs to seriously read the bible first.
 
You made some valid points but please do not think that I was crazy enough to take my information from Dan Brown’s “The DaVinci Code.” I might be new to the denomination but I have been a Christian for years therefore I know where not to get my information from. The book I got it from was written by a a well known scholar, the name I don’t have with me. I know that “The DaVinci Code” is a wonderful piece of fiction, but that is as far as it goes. Anyone who goes to that book for fact needs to seriously read the bible first.
OK, that’s great. I really wasn’t sure, but I feel better that you didn’t ‘go there’. I haven’t even read it, but I’ve heard enough talk about it since it was first published. There are so many foolish ‘theories’ out there about Mary Magdalen, that are so far from the truth, it’s ridiculous. We have to be careful not to believe anything that contradicts the Catholic point of view. I think the Church has plenty of historical sources for solid information, without all the speculation that some others tend to throw in to spice things up.

Personally, I absolutely love her. She’s always held a special place in my heart because she was so privileged to be able to sit at the feet of Jesus and listen to Him talk for hours on end. I wish I could do that. They really did have a unique relationship. :heaven:
 
Jumping in sort of late here perhaps, but I come from an atheist background, with strong feminist leanings (at the time).

During my conversion, the male-only aspect of Catholic priesthood was something I knew about, but did not know why. So, I went to a B&N, sat down with “Catholic For Dummies”, read something about women are mothers, men are priests, and promptly chucked the book across the room in disgust (literally). It sounded like a hollow excuse.

But, at the time, I had come to realize that I just did not understand a lot of things about religion, God and especially Jesus Christ. So, I just kept quiet and watched and waited to see what I would learn.

There came a point, while reading about something else in the CCC, that I came across the teaching on the priest acting in persona Christi. It hit me then, that I was not offended that Jesus Christ, the Word of God, became Incarnate as a male. Why should I be offended that a priest, who is acting in the person of Jesus Christ, is also male?

I find arguments towards “women are inferior” without the priesthood, to be sexist in nature. That is, somehow we aren’t complete without Holy Orders? I don’t think so, and reject that idea, entirely.

Since then (that was 4 or 5 years ago), I have come to realize that some people have a strong desire for service to God. Holy Orders is a very visible way in which that desire is fulfilled, and so people (male and female) get fixated on it. But it is not the only way, and not even a superior way. It is a way to be a servant of Jesus Christ. In a discernment process, one aspect is that one is aligning themselves to the teachings of the Church. So, it should be easy and clear, that discernment to priesthood by a woman, is a desire for service that can be fulfilled elsewhere. To think this is inferior is wrong-headed. Who would, for example, ever say to any of our female Saints that they discerned incorrectly?

It is not inferior for anyone to serve in any other capacity. To believe otherwise, is lacking in a Christian view. To believe that one is lacking in something because they are female and cannot be a priest, is risking a view of the Sacraments that is materialistic in fashion.

I don’t see an all male priesthood as saying something about men being superior and women being inferior. I think those who think I should have this view, are saying something about themselves, not me. 🙂 I understand clearly how God views me, and everyone else too.

Peace.
 
Wow. I am sorry, but if the Church ordains women, then its safe to say sooner or later the Church will ordain gays. Even if not so, I will leave if this happens.

And of course there is this want in America and Europe. I have seen Catholics online glorify the label “cafeteria catholics”. Who want to bring the Church even more so into the world. Where sexual sins are forgotten to be sins, and gay marriage to be welcomed alongside abortion. Who want to forget about hell and have a more universal like, feel good religion.

I could never understand Catholics who support abortion, and gay marriage. Catholic who are gay and live with their “spouses” despite the Churches teaching on the sinfulness of homosexuality.Of course in America. The land of abortion and leftist catholics. A society that will label you a zealot if you take the Catholic teachings to heart.
 
Wow. I am sorry, but if the Church ordains women, then its safe to say sooner or later the Church will ordain gays. Even if not so, I will leave if this happens.

And of course there is this want in America and Europe. I have seen Catholics online glorify the label “cafeteria catholics”. Who want to bring the Church even more so into the world. Where sexual sins are forgotten to be sins, and gay marriage to be welcomed alongside abortion. Who want to forget about hell and have a more universal like, feel good religion.

I could never understand Catholics who support abortion, and gay marriage. Catholic who are gay and live with their “spouses” despite the Churches teaching on the sinfulness of homosexuality.Of course in America. The land of abortion and leftist catholics. A society that will label you a zealot if you take the Catholic teachings to heart.
I have no issues nor do I lose sleep if I am called a zealot for following church teachings.
 
It’s not that women “may” not become priests, or not even that they’re not ALLOWED to, its that they CAN’T. They are PHYSICALLY UNABLE TO. Sure they could maybe physically do things like say mass, but as a role in society and life it just can’t be done because its not how God made it. Don’t listen to all that happy do good American christianity gunk.
 
I have no issues nor do I lose sleep if I am called a zealot for following church teachings.
I do not either. I may have just been venting. Its sad to see and hear of Catholics who are not loyal to the Church and to the Church teachings, trying to bring down the Holy Church and thous who are faithful to the Church. Who instead of leaving the church, they want to reform the church.
 
I do not either. I may have just been venting. Its sad to see and hear of Catholics who are not loyal to the Church and to the Church teachings, trying to bring down the Holy Church and thous who are faithful to the Church. Who instead of leaving the church, they want to reform the church.
Oh trust me,I know your sentiments. I work for a local parish here in So.Cal and I totally understand. Many Catholics let their secular ideas get in the way and want the church to conform to the world. Problem with those Catholics is that they want God to conform to them and the other way around.
 
The problem is that the ones who want women ordination don’t want to heed the words of St. Paul because they say either that was for St. Paul’s time or that he really didn’t say that. Once the Church sanction w.o. everything else is downhill, take a look at the ELCA, Episcopal Church and especially the United Church of Christ (UCC), some say that the UCC stands for Unitarians Considering Christ.
 
The problem is that the ones who want women ordination don’t want to heed the words of St. Paul because they say either that was for St. Paul’s time or that he really didn’t say that. Once the Church sanction w.o. everything else is downhill, take a look at the ELCA, Episcopal Church and especially the United Church of Christ (UCC), some say that the UCC stands for Unitarians Considering Christ.
Any unorthodox attempts to change church teaching is simply futile. It would take all of the bishops to really mess this up beyond repair.
 
Look guys, I also don’t understand why some people still don’t get why there is no possibility to ordain “Female priests” but I think you guys are going over the line saying things like “why don’t you leave” or stuff like that. When Martin Luther left the Church at a time the Church had a lot of corruption in the higher levels there were also saints inside the Church trying to help to develop a Reformation from the inside instead of the outside. I don’t think antagonizing people and telling them to go away is going to help anyone. God loves everyone, even those who don’t understand the truth and we are here to help them understand, even if we have to repeat ourselves 10000 times. I don’t think the Church will change this because it is something fundamental to what makes us Humans. I still think that the Church may change some views regarding women, but not ordination.

Peace,
Daniel
 
If we want to attempt to change church teaching, it has to be done in an orthodox manner.

😉
Now you’re in lala land. 😉 Church teaching does not change. Church discipline can change, but is not likely to over night. Example: celibate priests.

Now, ordination of women is no more possible than a man having a baby. One can go through the motion. The same is true about same sex couples. They can go through the life giving act, but the act is a lie. The same is true with women attempting ordination. Imagine circumcising women, it was only done to men. I wonder if today women would step up to the plate for that lie. :rolleyes:
 
Others have already made the point that the example of the liberal protestant churches is very telling.

When you consider their stunning decline, against the context of this and other errors, it is literally amazing to me that anyone will actually still raise the topic in an otherwise sensible discussion.

To give an analogy: imagine you saw someone jump off a cliff, to their death. And then someone said to you: “That looks like a good idea, doesn’t it? Why don’t you do that too?”.

I perceive a growing feeling that, in retrospect, some of the Vatican II reforms were perhaps ill-judged. Hence why, under B16, the Church is beginning to slowly edge back towards it’s traditional roots - not move further away from them.
 
Let me remind all, IF the CC were to ordain women, we would kiss all hope of reunion with the Orthodox goodbye.

Reunion is much more exciting than the prospect of suicide by theological and politically correct liberalism
 
Let me remind all, IF the CC were to ordain women, we would kiss all hope of reunion with the Orthodox goodbye.

Reunion is much more exciting than the prospect of suicide by theological and politically correct liberalism
Not to mention the rest of the Anglican church, the Old Catholics and the SSPX. 🙂
 
‘Women in authority reflect men in deception.’

Read that quote today from a book on ‘Cleopatra’.
Handy quote for women intent on avoiding the responsibility of authority, and a ready made excuse to complain about others who do embrace responsibility for themselves, and all those they serve. Not limited to the petty complaints of their husbands, but to their communities, their government, and their God. Indeed, it’s a very nasty habit for any Catholic of any gender or age to embrace- the negation of free will, and denying the gumption it takes to sweep your own porch or show up with 5 potential solutions in your hands instead of just complaints.

That quote applicable to all of womankind feeds 2 wrongful presumptions. That no woman has the capacity to lead with fidelity to the higher calling we are all compelled as sincere Christians to serve. It also presumes that the same commandeering of higher calling for malevolent purpose (deception) is restricted to gender. This same malevolent purpose endangers both genders (equally) and the same tools inflicted upon each corrupt their service for nefarious purposes (equally). Darkness is not any darker for a man than it is a woman. -30 degrees is not colder for one gender or another. Noble and weak character traits, good and evil, are not mutually exclusive to either gender.

Aimée Semple McPherson is another character in history illustrating your quote. How different is the leadership/ answer of a higher calling from charismatic male leadership? The same speeches of one could be spoken by the other and you’d never discern the difference. All down the line have served a higher calling, however IMO have failed to serve a higher calling poorly understood equally badly. The philosophical foundations were manifestly unsound. 7 million people in 4square gospel disagree with me. No bearing on gender whatsoever.

Contrast this with the Queens of England. Their commitment & discipline to a well articulated higher calling is vastly different. They’ve served their Kingdom well and earned the loyalty of a nation far beyond luck of the draw birthright. The rigors of duty attended graciously, the moral compass of the Kingdom rescued by the hands of women from the disgraces of King Henry the 8th & Bloody Mary alike. Queen Anne Boleyn sacrificed her life not for vanity, materialism, or path of least resistance, but for morality itself upholding her oath to God. Order to the Kingdom restored amidst incomprehensible layers of treachery preying upon her nation from all directions. Seeds of dissent sown by enemies foreign and domestic in every social strata, the Virgin Queen sacrificed her very lineage for the best interest of her Kingdom. Hitler was attributed characterizing the Queen Mum as “the most dangerous woman in Europe”.

Your quote applies to a slew of male Presidents surrounded by ambitious advisers void of higher calling. That very same quote applies to the Holy See the day he’s surrounded by ambition or a criminal enterprise attempting to circumvent the higher calling. That same quote applies to a devoted loving husband deceived to join the military in ‘defense’ of his nation/ wife/ family based on false accusations of threat to all he holds dear, when grievous offense in league with evil was what he actually served. No human being of any faith is immune, but every prejudice you, I, or any other harbors becomes the means of predators to inflict their worst damage & conscript the noblest of intentions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top